Andrea M McGrattan1, Yueping Zhu2, Connor D Richardson1, Devi Mohan3,4, Yee Chang Soh3,4, Ayesha Sajjad5, Carla van Aller1, Shulin Chen2, Stella-Maria Paddick6,7, Matthew Prina8, Mario Siervo9, Louise A Robinson1, Blossom C M Stephan10. 1. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK. 2. Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 3. Global Public Health. Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia. 4. South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University Malaysia, Segamat, Malaysia. 5. Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam RotterdamThe Netherlands. 6. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, UK. 7. Gateshead NHS Community Health Foundation Trust. 8. Social Epidemiology Research Group, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK. 9. School of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, UK. 10. Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Nottingham University, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a cognitive state associated with increased risk of dementia. Little research on MCI exists from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite high prevalence of dementia in these settings. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to review epidemiological reports to determine the prevalence of MCI and its associated risk factors in LMICs. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception until November 2019. Eligible articles reported on MCI in population or community-based studies from LMICs. No restrictions on the definition of MCI used as long as it was clearly defined. RESULTS: 4,621 articles were screened, and 78 retained. In total, n = 23 different LMICs were represented; mostly from China (n = 55 studies). Few studies from countries defined as lower-middle income (n = 14), low income (n = 4), or from population representative samples (n = 4). There was large heterogeneity in how MCI was diagnosed; with Petersen criteria the most commonly applied (n = 26). Prevalence of aMCI (Petersen criteria) ranged from 0.6%to 22.3%. Similar variability existed across studies using the International Working Group Criteria for aMCI (range 4.5%to 18.3%) and all-MCI (range 6.1%to 30.4%). Risk of MCI was associated with demographic (e.g., age), health (e.g., cardio-metabolic disease), and lifestyle (e.g., social isolation, smoking, diet and physical activity) factors. CONCLUSION: Outside of China, few MCI studies have been conducted in LMIC settings. There is an urgent need for population representative epidemiological studies to determine MCI prevalence in LMICs. MCI diagnostic methodology also needs to be standardized. This will allow for cross-study comparison and future resource planning.
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a cognitive state associated with increased risk of dementia. Little research on MCI exists from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite high prevalence of dementia in these settings. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to review epidemiological reports to determine the prevalence of MCI and its associated risk factors in LMICs. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception until November 2019. Eligible articles reported on MCI in population or community-based studies from LMICs. No restrictions on the definition of MCI used as long as it was clearly defined. RESULTS: 4,621 articles were screened, and 78 retained. In total, n = 23 different LMICs were represented; mostly from China (n = 55 studies). Few studies from countries defined as lower-middle income (n = 14), low income (n = 4), or from population representative samples (n = 4). There was large heterogeneity in how MCI was diagnosed; with Petersen criteria the most commonly applied (n = 26). Prevalence of aMCI (Petersen criteria) ranged from 0.6%to 22.3%. Similar variability existed across studies using the International Working Group Criteria for aMCI (range 4.5%to 18.3%) and all-MCI (range 6.1%to 30.4%). Risk of MCI was associated with demographic (e.g., age), health (e.g., cardio-metabolic disease), and lifestyle (e.g., social isolation, smoking, diet and physical activity) factors. CONCLUSION: Outside of China, few MCI studies have been conducted in LMIC settings. There is an urgent need for population representative epidemiological studies to determine MCI prevalence in LMICs. MCI diagnostic methodology also needs to be standardized. This will allow for cross-study comparison and future resource planning.
Authors: Andrea M McGrattan; Eduwin Pakpahan; Mario Siervo; Devi Mohan; Daniel D Reidpath; Matthew Prina; Pascale Allotey; Yueping Zhu; Chen Shulin; Jennifer Yates; Stella-Maria Paddick; Louise Robinson; Blossom C M Stephan Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2022-03-13