V M Srinivasan1, T T Lazaro1, A Srivatsan1, P Cooper2, M Phillips2, R Garcia1, S R Chen3, J N Johnson1, J-K Burkhardt1, D E Collins4, P Kan5. 1. From the Department of Neurosurgery (V.M.S., T.T.L., A.S., R.G., J.N.J., J.-K.B., P.K.). 2. Vena Medical (P.C., M.P.), Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology (S.R.C.), The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Center for Comparative Medicine (D.E.C.) Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. From the Department of Neurosurgery (V.M.S., T.T.L., A.S., R.G., J.N.J., J.-K.B., P.K.) ptkan@utmb.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visualization in neuroendovascular intervention currently relies on biplanar fluoroscopy and contrast administration. With the advent of endoscopy, direct visualization of the intracranial intravascular space has become possible with microangioscopes. We analyzed the efficacy of our novel microangioscope to enable direct observation and inspection of the cerebrovasculature, complementary to a standard fluoroscopic technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Iterations of microangioscopes were systematically evaluated for use in neurodiagnostics and neurointerventions in both live animal and human cadaveric models. Imaging quality, trackability, and navigability were assessed. Diagnostic procedures assessed included clot identification and differentiation, plaque identification, inspection for vessel wall injury, and assessment of stent apposition. Interventions performed included angioscope-assisted stent-retriever thrombectomy, clot aspiration, and coil embolization. RESULTS: The microangioscope was found helpful in both diagnosis and interventions by independent evaluators. Mean ratings of the imaging quality on a 5-point scale ranged from 3.0 (clot identification) to 4.7 (Pipeline follow-up). Mean ratings for clinical utility ranged from 3.0 (aspiration thrombectomy) to 4.7 (aneurysm treatment by coil embolization and WEB device). CONCLUSIONS: This fiber optic microangioscope can safely navigate and visualize the intravascular space in human cadaveric and in vivo animal models with satisfactory resolution. It has potential value in diagnostic and neurointerventional applications.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visualization in neuroendovascular intervention currently relies on biplanar fluoroscopy and contrast administration. With the advent of endoscopy, direct visualization of the intracranial intravascular space has become possible with microangioscopes. We analyzed the efficacy of our novel microangioscope to enable direct observation and inspection of the cerebrovasculature, complementary to a standard fluoroscopic technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Iterations of microangioscopes were systematically evaluated for use in neurodiagnostics and neurointerventions in both live animal and human cadaveric models. Imaging quality, trackability, and navigability were assessed. Diagnostic procedures assessed included clot identification and differentiation, plaque identification, inspection for vessel wall injury, and assessment of stent apposition. Interventions performed included angioscope-assisted stent-retriever thrombectomy, clot aspiration, and coil embolization. RESULTS: The microangioscope was found helpful in both diagnosis and interventions by independent evaluators. Mean ratings of the imaging quality on a 5-point scale ranged from 3.0 (clot identification) to 4.7 (Pipeline follow-up). Mean ratings for clinical utility ranged from 3.0 (aspiration thrombectomy) to 4.7 (aneurysm treatment by coil embolization and WEB device). CONCLUSIONS: This fiber optic microangioscope can safely navigate and visualize the intravascular space in human cadaveric and in vivo animal models with satisfactory resolution. It has potential value in diagnostic and neurointerventional applications.
Authors: Jildaz Caroff; Takamitsu Tamura; Robert M King; Pedro N Lylyk; Erin T Langan; Olivia W Brooks; Frédéric Clarençon; John Michael Wainwright; Laurent Spelle; Miklos Marosfoi; Matthew J Gounis; Ajit S Puri Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Robert M King; Olivia W Brooks; Erin T Langan; Jildaz Caroff; Frédéric Clarençon; Takamitsu Tamura; John Michael Wainwright; Matthew J Gounis; Miklós Marosfői; Ajit S Puri Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Luis E Savastano; Neeraj Chaudhary; Carlos Murga-Zamalloa; Michael Wang; Thomas Wang; B Gregory Thompson Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Nishita Singh; Martha Marko; Michael D Hill; Bijoy K Menon; Andrew Demchuk; Shelagh B Coutts; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Johanna M Ospel Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Visish M Srinivasan; Stephen R Chen; Kevin M Camstra; Gouthami Chintalapani; Peter Kan Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Luis E Savastano; Quan Zhou; Arlene Smith; Karla Vega; Carlos Murga-Zamalloa; David Gordon; Jon McHugh; Lili Zhao; Michael Wang; Aditya Pandey; B Gregory Thompson; Jie Xu; Jifeng Zhang; Y Eugene Chen; Eric J Seibel; Thomas D Wang Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Julian Maingard; Kevin Phan; Anthony Lamanna; Hong Kuan Kok; Christen D Barras; Jeremy Russell; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Vincent Thijs; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Robert M King; Miklos Marosfoi; Jildaz Caroff; Giovanni J Ughi; Dale M Groth; Matthew J Gounis; Ajit S Puri Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 5.836