Literature DB >> 33357218

Blood loss from transverse versus longitudinal uterine incision in abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Alaa Elguindy1, Hosam Hemeda1, Mohamed Esmat Shawky1, Mohamed Elsenity1, Medhat Adel Elsayed1, Ahmed Fahim1, Khaled Afifi1, Maii Nawara2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether transverse uterine incision is non-inferior to longitudinal incision during myomectomy with regard to bleeding. Our aim was to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incisions in myomectomy.
METHODS: A parallel randomized controlled single-blinded study in a university affiliated hospital, in the period between January 2017 and April 2018, in which 52 women candidates for abdominal myomectomy were randomized into transverse uterine incision or longitudinal uterine incision groups (26 in each group). Intraoperative blood loss (estimated directly by blood volume in suction bottle and linen towels and indirectly by difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit), operative time and postoperative fever were analyzed.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between transverse and longitudinal incisions regarding intraoperative blood loss (389.7 ± 98.56 ml vs 485.04 ± 230.6 ml respectively, p value = 0.07), operative time (59.96 ± 16.78 min vs 66.58 ± 17.33 min respectively, p value = 0.18), and postoperative fever (4% vs 8.33%, p value = 0.6).
CONCLUSION: Transverse uterine incision does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision and is a reasonable option during abdominal myomectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03009812 at clinicaltrials.gov, registered January 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood loss; Longitudinal uterine incision; Myomectomy; Randomized controlled study; Transverse uterine incision

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357218      PMCID: PMC7768654          DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01113-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Womens Health        ISSN: 1472-6874            Impact factor:   2.809


  6 in total

1.  Uterine rupture during pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  J B Dubuisson; X Chavet; C Chapron; S S Gregorakis; P Morice
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Myomectomy fever: testing the dogma.

Authors:  R E Iverson; D Chelmow; K Strohbehn; L Waldman; E G Evantash; M P Aronson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Laparoscopic myomectomy focusing on the myoma pseudocapsule: technical and outcome reports.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Brad S Hurst; Gernot Hudelist; Daniel Alberto Tsin; Michael Stark; Liselotte Mettler; Marcello Guido; Antonio Malvasi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  What are the maternal implications of a classical caesarean section?

Authors:  R A Greene; C Fitzpatrick; M J Turner
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Impact of surgical approach on blood loss during intracapsular myomectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Liselotte Mettler; Antonio Malvasi; Brad Hurst; William Catherino; Ospan A Mynbaev; Marcello Guido; Ibrahim Alkatout; Thoralf Schollmeyer
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review.

Authors:  E A Stewart; C L Cookson; R A Gandolfo; R Schulze-Rath
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 6.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.