Literature DB >> 33357018

The Role of the Clinically Obtained Acoustic Reflex as a Research Tool for Subclinical Hearing Pathologies.

Andrew Causon1,2, Kevin J Munro1,2, Christopher J Plack1,3, Garreth Prendergast1.   

Abstract

The acoustic reflex (AR) shows promise as an objective test for the presence of cochlear synaptopathy in rodents. The AR has also been shown to be reduced in humans with tinnitus compared to those without. The aim of the present study was twofold: (a) to determine if AR strength (quantified as both threshold and growth) varied with lifetime noise exposure, and thus provided an estimate of the degree of synaptopathy and (b) to identify which factors should be considered when using the AR as a quantitative measure rather than just present/absent responses. AR thresholds and growth functions were measured using ipsilateral and contralateral, broadband and tonal elicitors in adults with normal hearing and varying levels of lifetime noise exposure. Only the clinical standard 226 Hz probe tone was used. AR threshold and growth were not related to lifetime noise exposure, suggesting that routine clinical AR measures are not a sensitive measure when investigating the effects of noise exposure in audiometrically normal listeners. Our secondary, exploratory analyses revealed that AR threshold and growth were significantly related to middle-ear compliance. Listeners with higher middle-ear compliance (though still in the clinically normal range) showed lower AR thresholds and steeper AR growth functions. Furthermore, there was a difference in middle-ear compliance between the sexes, with males showing higher middle-ear compliance values than females. Therefore, it may be necessary to factor middle-ear compliance values into any analysis that uses the AR as an estimate of auditory function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic reflex; cochlear synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss; middle-ear muscle reflex

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357018      PMCID: PMC7768875          DOI: 10.1177/2331216520972860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.293


  39 in total

1.  Acoustic reflex detection using wide-band acoustic reflectance, admittance, and power measurements.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Wideband reflectance measures of the ipsilateral acoustic stapedius reflex threshold.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Douglas H Keefe; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Effects of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech-in-noise tasks: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Age and sex variations for the normal stapedial reflex thresholds and tympanometric compliance values.

Authors:  D Osterhammel; P Osterhammel
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1979

5.  Effects of cochlear synaptopathy on middle-ear muscle reflexes in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of aging on the click-rate induced facilitation of acoustic reflex thresholds.

Authors:  V W Rawool
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah A Kirk; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Letter to the Editor: Examination of Potential Sex Influences in . Auditory Function in Normal-Hearing, Noise-Exposed Human Ears, Ear Hear, 36, 172-184.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.

Authors:  Angela N C Fulbright; Colleen G Le Prell; Scott K Griffiths; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

10.  Reliability and interrelations of seven proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Garreth Prendergast; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  The Effect of Lifetime Noise Exposure and Aging on Speech-Perception-in-Noise Ability and Self-Reported Hearing Symptoms: An Online Study.

Authors:  Adnan M Shehabi; Garreth Prendergast; Hannah Guest; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 3.  The Relative and Combined Effects of Noise Exposure and Aging on Auditory Peripheral Neural Deafferentation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Adnan M Shehabi; Garreth Prendergast; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 4.  Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.