L Klous1, C J de Ruiter1, S Scherrer1,2, N Gerrett1, H A M Daanen3. 1. Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.a.m.daanen@vu.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To reduce the need for invasive and expensive measures of human biomarkers, sweat is becoming increasingly popular in use as an alternative to blood. Therefore, the (in)dependency of blood and sweat composition has to be explored. METHODS: In an environmental chamber (33 °C, 65% relative humidity; RH), 12 participants completed three subsequent 20-min cycling stages to elicit three different local sweat rates (LSR) while aiming to limit changes in blood composition: at 60% of their maximum heart rate (HRmax), 70% HRmax and 80% HRmax, with 5 min of seated-rest in between. Sweat was collected from the arm and back during each stage and post-exercise. Blood was drawn from a superficial antecubital vein in the middle of each stage. Concentrations of sodium, chloride, potassium, ammonia, lactate and glucose were determined in blood plasma and sweat. RESULTS: With increasing exercise intensity, LSR, sweat sodium, chloride and glucose concentrations increased (P ≤ 0.026), while simultaneously limited changes in blood composition were elicited for these components (P ≥ 0.093). Sweat potassium, lactate and ammonia concentrations decreased (P ≤ 0.006), while blood potassium decreased (P = 0.003), and blood ammonia and lactate concentrations increased with higher exercise intensities (P = 0.005; P = 0.007, respectively). The vast majority of correlations between blood and sweat parameters were non-significant (P > 0.05), with few exceptions. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that sweat composition is at least partly independent of blood composition. This has important consequences when targeting sweat as non-invasive alternative for blood measurements.
PURPOSE: To reduce the need for invasive and expensive measures of human biomarkers, sweat is becoming increasingly popular in use as an alternative to blood. Therefore, the (in)dependency of blood and sweat composition has to be explored. METHODS: In an environmental chamber (33 °C, 65% relative humidity; RH), 12 participants completed three subsequent 20-min cycling stages to elicit three different local sweat rates (LSR) while aiming to limit changes in blood composition: at 60% of their maximum heart rate (HRmax), 70% HRmax and 80% HRmax, with 5 min of seated-rest in between. Sweat was collected from the arm and back during each stage and post-exercise. Blood was drawn from a superficial antecubital vein in the middle of each stage. Concentrations of sodium, chloride, potassium, ammonia, lactate and glucose were determined in blood plasma and sweat. RESULTS: With increasing exercise intensity, LSR, sweat sodium, chloride and glucose concentrations increased (P ≤ 0.026), while simultaneously limited changes in blood composition were elicited for these components (P ≥ 0.093). Sweat potassium, lactate and ammonia concentrations decreased (P ≤ 0.006), while blood potassium decreased (P = 0.003), and blood ammonia and lactate concentrations increased with higher exercise intensities (P = 0.005; P = 0.007, respectively). The vast majority of correlations between blood and sweat parameters were non-significant (P > 0.05), with few exceptions. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that sweat composition is at least partly independent of blood composition. This has important consequences when targeting sweat as non-invasive alternative for blood measurements.
Authors: Amay J Bandodkar; Somayeh Imani; Rogelio Nuñez-Flores; Rajan Kumar; Chiyi Wang; A M Vinu Mohan; Joseph Wang; Patrick P Mercier Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 10.618
Authors: Austin B Bigley; Nadia H Agha; Forrest L Baker; Guillaume Spielmann; Hawley E Kunz; Preteesh L Mylabathula; Bridgette V Rooney; Mitzi S Laughlin; Satish K Mehta; Duane L Pierson; Brian E Crucian; Richard J Simpson Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2018-11-01
Authors: Amay J Bandodkar; Philipp Gutruf; Jungil Choi; KunHyuck Lee; Yurina Sekine; Jonathan T Reeder; William J Jeang; Alexander J Aranyosi; Stephen P Lee; Jeffrey B Model; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Chun-Ju Su; John P Leshock; Tyler Ray; Anthony Verrillo; Kyle Thomas; Vaishnavi Krishnamurthi; Seungyong Han; Jeonghyun Kim; Siddharth Krishnan; Tao Hang; John A Rogers Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Annemarijn S M Steijlen; Kaspar M B Jansen; Jeroen Bastemeijer; Paddy J French; Andre Bossche Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 8.008
Authors: Ahmed Bahgat Radwan; Sreedevi Paramparambath; John-John Cabibihan; Abdulaziz Khalid Al-Ali; Peter Kasak; Rana A Shakoor; Rayaz A Malik; Said A Mansour; Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni Journal: Biosensors (Basel) Date: 2021-11-18
Authors: Tamoghna Saha; Jennifer Fang; Sneha Mukherjee; Charles T Knisely; Michael D Dickey; Orlin D Velev Journal: Micromachines (Basel) Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 2.891