Importance: Recommendations for adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are based solely on TNM classification but are agnostic to genomic and high-risk clinicopathologic factors. Creation of a prediction model that integrates tumor genomic and clinicopathologic factors may better identify patients at risk for recurrence. Objective: To identify tumor genomic factors independently associated with recurrence, even in the presence of aggressive, high-risk clinicopathologic variables, in patients with completely resected stages I to III LUAD, and to develop a computational machine-learning prediction model (PRecur) to determine whether the integration of genomic and clinicopathologic features could better predict risk of recurrence, compared with the TNM system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 426 patients treated from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, at a single large cancer center and selected in consecutive samples. Eligibility criteria included complete surgical resection of stages I to III LUAD, broad-panel next-generation sequencing data with matched clinicopathologic data, and no neoadjuvant therapy. External validation of the PRecur prediction model was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study end point consisted of relapse-free survival (RFS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Associations among clinicopathologic factors, genomic alterations, and RFS were established using Cox proportional hazards regression. The PRecur prediction model integrated genomic and clinicopathologic factors using gradient-boosting survival regression for risk group generation and prediction of RFS. A concordance probability estimate (CPE) was used to assess the predictive ability of the PRecur model. Results: Of the 426 patients included in the analysis (286 women [67%]; median age at surgery, 69 [interquartile range, 62-75] years), 318 (75%) had stage I cancer. Association analysis showed that alterations in SMARCA4 (clinicopathologic-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.03-5.77; P = .042) and TP53 (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.73; P = .02) and the fraction of genome altered (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.10-1.04; P = .005) were independently associated with RFS. The PRecur prediction model outperformed the TNM-based model (CPE, 0.73 vs 0.61; difference, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.19]; P < .001) for prediction of RFS. To validate the prediction model, PRecur was applied to the TCGA LUAD data set (n = 360), and a clear separation of risk groups was noted (log-rank statistic, 7.5; P = .02), confirming external validation. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that integration of tumor genomics and clinicopathologic features improves risk stratification and prediction of recurrence after surgical resection of early-stage LUAD. Improved identification of patients at risk for recurrence could enrich and enhance accrual to adjuvant therapy clinical trials.
Importance: Recommendations for adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are based solely on TNM classification but are agnostic to genomic and high-risk clinicopathologic factors. Creation of a prediction model that integrates tumor genomic and clinicopathologic factors may better identify patients at risk for recurrence. Objective: To identify tumor genomic factors independently associated with recurrence, even in the presence of aggressive, high-risk clinicopathologic variables, in patients with completely resected stages I to III LUAD, and to develop a computational machine-learning prediction model (PRecur) to determine whether the integration of genomic and clinicopathologic features could better predict risk of recurrence, compared with the TNM system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 426 patients treated from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, at a single large cancer center and selected in consecutive samples. Eligibility criteria included complete surgical resection of stages I to III LUAD, broad-panel next-generation sequencing data with matched clinicopathologic data, and no neoadjuvant therapy. External validation of the PRecur prediction model was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study end point consisted of relapse-free survival (RFS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Associations among clinicopathologic factors, genomic alterations, and RFS were established using Cox proportional hazards regression. The PRecur prediction model integrated genomic and clinicopathologic factors using gradient-boosting survival regression for risk group generation and prediction of RFS. A concordance probability estimate (CPE) was used to assess the predictive ability of the PRecur model. Results: Of the 426 patients included in the analysis (286 women [67%]; median age at surgery, 69 [interquartile range, 62-75] years), 318 (75%) had stage I cancer. Association analysis showed that alterations in SMARCA4 (clinicopathologic-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.03-5.77; P = .042) and TP53 (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.73; P = .02) and the fraction of genome altered (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.10-1.04; P = .005) were independently associated with RFS. The PRecur prediction model outperformed the TNM-based model (CPE, 0.73 vs 0.61; difference, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.19]; P < .001) for prediction of RFS. To validate the prediction model, PRecur was applied to the TCGA LUAD data set (n = 360), and a clear separation of risk groups was noted (log-rank statistic, 7.5; P = .02), confirming external validation. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that integration of tumor genomics and clinicopathologic features improves risk stratification and prediction of recurrence after surgical resection of early-stage LUAD. Improved identification of patients at risk for recurrence could enrich and enhance accrual to adjuvant therapy clinical trials.
Authors: Rocio Perez-Johnston; Jose A Araujo-Filho; James G Connolly; Raul Caso; Karissa Whiting; Kay See Tan; Jian Zhou; Peter Gibbs; Natasha Rekhtman; Michelle S Ginsberg; David R Jones Journal: Radiology Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Bastien Nguyen; Christopher Fong; Anisha Luthra; Shaleigh A Smith; Renzo G DiNatale; Subhiksha Nandakumar; Henry Walch; Walid K Chatila; Ramyasree Madupuri; Ritika Kundra; Craig M Bielski; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; Mark T A Donoghue; Adrienne Boire; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Karuna Ganesh; James J Harding; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Pedram Razavi; Ed Reznik; Charles M Rudin; Dmitriy Zamarin; Wassim Abida; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Carol Aghajanian; Andrea Cercek; Ping Chi; Darren Feldman; Alan L Ho; Gopakumar Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Michael Morris; Robert J Motzer; Eileen M O'Reilly; Michael A Postow; Nitya P Raj; Gregory J Riely; Mark E Robson; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anton Safonov; Alexander N Shoushtari; William Tap; Min Yuen Teo; Anna M Varghese; Martin Voss; Rona Yaeger; Marjorie G Zauderer; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Bernard Bochner; Abraham Hakimi; William R Jarnagin; David R Jones; Daniela Molena; Luc Morris; Eric Rios-Doria; Paul Russo; Samuel Singer; Vivian E Strong; Debyani Chakravarty; Lora H Ellenson; Anuradha Gopalan; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt; Marc Ladanyi; Mithat Gonen; Sohrab P Shah; Joan Massague; Jianjiong Gao; Ahmet Zehir; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Samuel F Bakhoum; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Nikolaus Schultz Journal: Cell Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 66.850
Authors: Gregory D Jones; Raul Caso; Kay See Tan; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Yuan Liu; James G Connolly; Yonina R Murciano-Goroff; Matthew J Bott; Prasad S Adusumilli; Daniela Molena; Gaetano Rocco; Valerie W Rusch; Smita Sihag; Sandra Misale; Rona Yaeger; Alexander Drilon; Kathryn C Arbour; Gregory J Riely; Neal Rosen; Piro Lito; Haiying Zhang; David C Lyden; Charles M Rudin; David R Jones; Bob T Li; James M Isbell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Johannes R Kratz; Jack Z Li; Jessica Tsui; Jen C Lee; Vivianne W Ding; Arjun A Rao; Michael J Mann; Vincent Chan; Alexis J Combes; Matthew F Krummel; David M Jablons Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Raul Caso; James G Connolly; Jian Zhou; Kay See Tan; James J Choi; Gregory D Jones; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Bastien Nguyen; Gaetano Rocco; Daniela Molena; Smita Sihag; Prasad S Adusumilli; Matthew J Bott; David R Jones Journal: NPJ Precis Oncol Date: 2021-07-21
Authors: Harry B Lengel; James G Connolly; Gregory D Jones; Raul Caso; Jian Zhou; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; James M Isbell; Bob T Li; Yuan Liu; Natasha Rekhtman; David R Jones Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 6.575