Oanh L Meyer1, Chloe W Eng2,3, Michelle J Ko4, Michelle L Chan1, Uyen Ngo1, Paola Gilsanz3, M Maria Glymour2, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda5, Dan M Mungas1, Rachel A Whitmer3,4. 1. Department of Neurology, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of generational status and age at immigration with later life cognitive outcomes in a diverse sample of Latinos and Asian Americans. DESIGN: Baseline data were obtained from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study, and a prospective cohort is initiated in 2017. SETTING: Older adults in Northern California. PARTICIPANTS: Our cohort consisted of Asians (n = 411) and Latinos (n = 340) who were on average 76 years old (SD = 6.8). MEASUREMENTS: We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations between generational status and age at immigration (collapsed into one five-level variable) with measures of verbal episodic memory, semantic memory, and executive function, adjusting for age, gender, race and ethnicity, and own- and parental education. RESULTS: Generational status and age at immigration were associated with cognitive outcomes in a graded manner. Compared to third-generation or higher immigrants, first-generation immigration in adulthood was associated with lower semantic memory (β = -0.96; 95% CI: -1.12, -0.81) than immigration in adolescence (β = -0.68; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.41) or childhood (β = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.06). Moreover, immigration in adulthood was associated with lower executive function (β = -0.63; 95% CI: -0.78, -0.48) than immigration in adolescence (β = -0.49; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.23). Similarly, compared to third-generation individuals, first-generation immigrants had lower executive functioning scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the notion that sociocontextual influences in early life impact later life cognitive scores. Longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify how immigration characteristics affect cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of generational status and age at immigration with later life cognitive outcomes in a diverse sample of Latinos and Asian Americans. DESIGN: Baseline data were obtained from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study, and a prospective cohort is initiated in 2017. SETTING: Older adults in Northern California. PARTICIPANTS: Our cohort consisted of Asians (n = 411) and Latinos (n = 340) who were on average 76 years old (SD = 6.8). MEASUREMENTS: We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations between generational status and age at immigration (collapsed into one five-level variable) with measures of verbal episodic memory, semantic memory, and executive function, adjusting for age, gender, race and ethnicity, and own- and parental education. RESULTS: Generational status and age at immigration were associated with cognitive outcomes in a graded manner. Compared to third-generation or higher immigrants, first-generation immigration in adulthood was associated with lower semantic memory (β = -0.96; 95% CI: -1.12, -0.81) than immigration in adolescence (β = -0.68; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.41) or childhood (β = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.06). Moreover, immigration in adulthood was associated with lower executive function (β = -0.63; 95% CI: -0.78, -0.48) than immigration in adolescence (β = -0.49; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.23). Similarly, compared to third-generation individuals, first-generation immigrants had lower executive functioning scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the notion that sociocontextual influences in early life impact later life cognitive scores. Longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify how immigration characteristics affect cognitive decline.
Authors: M X Tang; P Cross; H Andrews; D M Jacobs; S Small; K Bell; C Merchant; R Lantigua; R Costa; Y Stern; R Mayeux Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-01-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ana F Abraído-Lanza; Adria N Armbrister; Karen R Flórez; Alejandra N Aguirre Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brian Downer; Amit Kumar; Sreenivas P Veeranki; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Mukaila Raji; Kyriakos S Markides Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hector M González; Miguel Ceballos; Wassim Tarraf; Brady T West; Mary E Bowen; William A Vega Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yuri Jang; Eunyoung Choi; Min-Kyoung Rhee; Hyunwoo Yoon; Nan Sook Park; David A Chiriboga Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Joseph Fong; Taylor M Mobley; Paola Gilsanz; Rachel A Whitmer; Gilbert C Gee; Ron Brookmeyer; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 16.655