Guangyu Tao1, Lekang Yin2, Dejun Shi3, Jianding Ye1, Zhenghai Lu4, Zhen Zhou3, Yizhou Yu3, Xiaodan Ye1, Hong Yu1. 1. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Deepwise AI Lab, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of reducing pixel size on the consistency of radiomic features and the diagnostic performance of the downstream radiomic signatures for the invasiveness for pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) on CTs. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 182 patients with GGNs on high resolution CT (HRCT). The CT images of different pixel sizes (0.8mm, 0.4mm, 0.18 mm) were obtained by reconstructing the single HRCT scan using three combinations of field of view and matrix size. For each pixel size setting, radiomic features were extracted for all GGNs and radiomic signatures for the invasiveness of GGNs were built through two modeling pipelines for comparison. RESULTS: The study finally extracted 788 radiomic features. 87% radiomic features demonstrated inter pixel size variation. By either modeling pipeline, the radiomic signature under small pixel size performed significantly better than those under middle or large pixel sizes in predicting the invasiveness of GGNs (p's value <0.05 by Delong test). With the independent modeling pipeline, the three pixel size bounded radiomic signatures shared almost no common features. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing pixel size could cause inconsistency in most radiomic features and improve the diagnostic performance of the downstream radiomic signatures. Particularly, super HRCTs with small pixel size resulted in more accurate radiomic signatures for the invasiveness of GGNs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The dependence of radiomic features on pixel size will affect the performance of the downstream radiomic signatures. The future radiomic studies should consider this effect of pixel size.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of reducing pixel size on the consistency of radiomic features and the diagnostic performance of the downstream radiomic signatures for the invasiveness for pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) on CTs. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 182 patients with GGNs on high resolution CT (HRCT). The CT images of different pixel sizes (0.8mm, 0.4mm, 0.18 mm) were obtained by reconstructing the single HRCT scan using three combinations of field of view and matrix size. For each pixel size setting, radiomic features were extracted for all GGNs and radiomic signatures for the invasiveness of GGNs were built through two modeling pipelines for comparison. RESULTS: The study finally extracted 788 radiomic features. 87% radiomic features demonstrated inter pixel size variation. By either modeling pipeline, the radiomic signature under small pixel size performed significantly better than those under middle or large pixel sizes in predicting the invasiveness of GGNs (p's value <0.05 by Delong test). With the independent modeling pipeline, the three pixel size bounded radiomic signatures shared almost no common features. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing pixel size could cause inconsistency in most radiomic features and improve the diagnostic performance of the downstream radiomic signatures. Particularly, super HRCTs with small pixel size resulted in more accurate radiomic signatures for the invasiveness of GGNs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The dependence of radiomic features on pixel size will affect the performance of the downstream radiomic signatures. The future radiomic studies should consider this effect of pixel size.
Authors: Muhammad Shafiq-Ul-Hassan; Geoffrey G Zhang; Kujtim Latifi; Ghanim Ullah; Dylan C Hunt; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Mahmoud Abrahem Abdalah; Matthew B Schabath; Dmitry G Goldgof; Dennis Mackin; Laurence Edward Court; Robert James Gillies; Eduardo Gerardo Moros Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Sheena Patel; Jeffrey P Kanne; Linda S Kinsinger; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Guy Soo Hoo; Frank C Detterbeck Journal: Chest Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Guangyu Tao; Li Zhu; Qunhui Chen; Lekang Yin; Yamin Li; Jiancheng Yang; Bingbing Ni; Zheng Zhang; Chi Wan Koo; Pradnya D Patil; Yinan Chen; Hong Yu; Yi Xu; Xiaodan Ye Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2022-02