Darlene Santiago1, Victor Mangas-Sanjuan2,3, Kyle Melin4, Jorge Duconge1, Wenchen Zhao5, Raman Venkataramanan5,6. 1. Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Puerto Rico, 00936-5067 San Juan, Puerto Rico. 2. Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Parasitology, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain. 3. Interuniversity Research Institute for Molecular Recognition and Technological Development, Polytechnic University of Valencia, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain. 4. Pharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Puerto Rico, 00936-5067 San Juan, Puerto Rico. 5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, MWRI, UPCI, MIRM, Thomas Starzl Transplantation Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and its metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide; BUP-g, norbuprenorphine; Nor-BUP, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide; Nor-BUP-g) in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients in Puerto Rico (PR) as a first step of evidence-based BUP dosing strategies in this population. METHODS: BUP and metabolites concentrations were measured from 0 to 8 h after the administration of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone films in 12 stable OUD subjects. RESULTS: PK non-compartmental characteristics showed considerable variability in parameters between the subjects over the 8-h sampling time (tmax = 1.5 ± 0.7 h, Co = 1.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL, Cmax= 7.1 ± 6 ng/mL, and AUC0-8h = 26.8 ± 17.8 h·ng/mL). Subjects had a significantly higher tendency towards CYP-mediated N-demethylation, with the AUC0-8h ratios of the molar concentrations of [Nor-BUP + Nor-BUP-g] to BUP being (3.4 ± 1.9) significantly higher compared with BUP-g to BUP (0.19 ± 0.2). A two-compartment population-PK model with linear absorption (ka = 2.54 h-1), distribution (k12= 2.34 h-1, k14 = 1.29 h-1), metabolism (k24 = 1.28 × 10-1 h-1, k23 = 6.43 × 10-2 h-1, k35 = 1.23 × 10-1 h-1, k45 = 8.73 × 10-1 h-1), and elimination (k30 = 3.81 × 10-3 h-1, k50 = 1.27 × 10-1 h-1) adequately described the time-course of BUP and its metabolites, which has been externally validated using published data. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited in sampling time and number of recruited subjects, this study presents specific BUP PK characteristics that evidenced the need for additional PK studies and subsequent modeling of the data for the development of evidence-based dosing approaches in Puerto Rico.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and its metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide; BUP-g, norbuprenorphine; Nor-BUP, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide; Nor-BUP-g) in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients in Puerto Rico (PR) as a first step of evidence-based BUP dosing strategies in this population. METHODS: BUP and metabolites concentrations were measured from 0 to 8 h after the administration of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone films in 12 stable OUD subjects. RESULTS: PK non-compartmental characteristics showed considerable variability in parameters between the subjects over the 8-h sampling time (tmax = 1.5 ± 0.7 h, Co = 1.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL, Cmax= 7.1 ± 6 ng/mL, and AUC0-8h = 26.8 ± 17.8 h·ng/mL). Subjects had a significantly higher tendency towards CYP-mediated N-demethylation, with the AUC0-8h ratios of the molar concentrations of [Nor-BUP + Nor-BUP-g] to BUP being (3.4 ± 1.9) significantly higher compared with BUP-g to BUP (0.19 ± 0.2). A two-compartment population-PK model with linear absorption (ka = 2.54 h-1), distribution (k12= 2.34 h-1, k14 = 1.29 h-1), metabolism (k24 = 1.28 × 10-1 h-1, k23 = 6.43 × 10-2 h-1, k35 = 1.23 × 10-1 h-1, k45 = 8.73 × 10-1 h-1), and elimination (k30 = 3.81 × 10-3 h-1, k50 = 1.27 × 10-1 h-1) adequately described the time-course of BUP and its metabolites, which has been externally validated using published data. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited in sampling time and number of recruited subjects, this study presents specific BUP PK characteristics that evidenced the need for additional PK studies and subsequent modeling of the data for the development of evidence-based dosing approaches in Puerto Rico.
Entities:
Keywords:
Puerto Ricans; Suboxone; buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual film; compartmental modeling; opioid use disorder (OUD); pharmacokinetics; popPK; population pharmacokinetics
Authors: Valerie A Gruber; Petrie M Rainey; David E Moody; Gene D Morse; Qing Ma; Sudha Prathikanti; Patricia A Pade; Anika A H Alvanzo; Elinore F McCance-Katz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tony Priestley; Arvind K Chappa; Diane R Mould; Richard N Upton; Neil Shusterman; Steven Passik; Vicente J Tormo; Stephen Camper Journal: Pain Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Brian J Piper; Dipam T Shah; Olapeju M Simoyan; Kenneth L McCall; Stephanie D Nichols Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Azmi F Nasser; Christian Heidbreder; Roberto Gomeni; Paul J Fudala; Bo Zheng; Mark K Greenwald Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.447