Literature DB >> 15080765

Pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of sublingual buprenorphine, alone or in combination with naloxone: lack of dose proportionality.

Debra S Harris1, John E Mendelson, Emil T Lin, Robert A Upton, Reese T Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combinations are effective pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence, but doses are considerably greater than analgesic doses. Because dose-related buprenorphine opioid agonist effects may plateau at higher doses, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of expected therapeutic doses.
DESIGN: The first experiment examined a range of sublingual buprenorphine solution doses with an ascending dose design (n = 12). The second experiment examined a range of doses of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets along with one dose of buprenorphine alone tablets with a balanced crossover design (n = 8). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty nondependent, opioid-experienced volunteers.
METHODS: Subjects in the solution experiment received sublingual buprenorphine solution in single ascending doses of 4, 8, 16 and 32 mg. Subjects in the tablet experiment received sublingual tablets combining buprenorphine 4, 8 and 16 mg with naloxone at a 4 : 1 ratio or buprenorphine 16 mg alone, given as single doses. Plasma buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects were measured for 48-72 hours after administration.
RESULTS: Buprenorphine concentrations increased with dose, but not proportionally. Dose-adjusted areas under the concentration-time curve for buprenorphine 32 mg solution, buprenorphine 1 6 mg tablet and buprenorphine/naloxone 16/4 mg tablet were only 54 +/- 16%, 70 +/- 25% and 72 +/- 17%, respectively, of that of the 4 mg dose of sublingual solution or tablet. No differences were found between dose strengths for most subjective and physiological effects. Pupil constriction at 48 hours after administration of solution did, however, increase with dose. Subjects reported greater intoxication with the 32 mg solution dose, even though acceptability of the 4 mg dose was greatest. Naloxone did not change the bioavailability or effects of the buprenorphine 16 mg tablet.
CONCLUSION: Less than dose-proportional increases in plasma buprenorphine concentrations may contribute to the observed plateau for most pharmacodynamic effects as the dose is increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15080765     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  27 in total

1.  Opioid chronopharmacology.

Authors:  A W Fox
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.292

2.  Human pharmacokinetics of intravenous, sublingual, and buccal buprenorphine.

Authors:  J J Kuhlman; S Lalani; J Magluilo; B Levine; W D Darwin
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence.

Authors:  R E Johnson; M A Chutuape; E C Strain; S L Walsh; M L Stitzer; G E Bigelow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding.

Authors:  R A Boas; J W Villiger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine.

Authors:  D S Harris; R T Jones; S Welm; R A Upton; E Lin; J Mendelson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Acute administration of buprenorphine in humans: partial agonist and blockade effects.

Authors:  S L Walsh; K L Preston; G E Bigelow; M L Stitzer
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Buprenorphine maintenance treatment of opiate dependence: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  W Ling; C Charuvastra; J F Collins; S Batki; L S Brown; P Kintaudi; D R Wesson; L McNicholas; D J Tusel; U Malkerneker; J A Renner; E Santos; P Casadonte; C Fye; S Stine; R I Wang; D Segal
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Buprenorphine and naloxone combinations: the effects of three dose ratios in morphine-stabilized, opiate-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  J Mendelson; R T Jones; S Welm; M Baggott; I Fernandez; A K Melby; R P Nath
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Sublingual absorption of selected opioid analgesics.

Authors:  D S Weinberg; C E Inturrisi; B Reidenberg; D E Moulin; T J Nip; S Wallenstein; R W Houde; K M Foley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  In vivo receptor binding of the opiate partial agonist, buprenorphine, correlated with its agonistic and antagonistic actions.

Authors:  J E Dum; A Herz
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Abuse-Deterrent Opioid Formulations: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Claudia Knothe; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Buprenorphine: clinical pharmacokinetics in the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  Alexander Elkader; Beth Sproule
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone precipitated withdrawal in subjects maintained on 100mg of daily methadone.

Authors:  James Rosado; Sharon L Walsh; George E Bigelow; Eric C Strain
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Buprenorphine implant for opioid addiction.

Authors:  Walter Ling
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2012-07

5.  An evidence-based recommendation to increase the dosing frequency of buprenorphine during pregnancy.

Authors:  Steve N Caritis; Jaime R Bastian; Hongfei Zhang; Hari Kalluri; Dennis English; Michael England; Stephanie Bobby; Raman Venkataramanan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Probuphine® (buprenorphine implant): a promising candidate in opioid dependence.

Authors:  Preeti Barnwal; Saibal Das; Somnath Mondal; Anand Ramasamy; Tanay Maiti; Arunava Saha
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12-19

Review 7.  Buprenorphine in cancer pain.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Preliminary buprenorphine sublingual tablet pharmacokinetic data in plasma, oral fluid, and sweat during treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women.

Authors:  Marta Concheiro; Hendreé E Jones; Rolley E Johnson; Robin Choo; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Intravenous buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine pharmacokinetics in humans.

Authors:  M A Huestis; E J Cone; S O Pirnay; A Umbricht; K L Preston
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  The effects of maternally administered methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone on offspring: review of human and animal data.

Authors:  W O Farid; S A Dunlop; R J Tait; G K Hulse
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.