Marko Tainio1, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen2, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen3, Liang Hu4, Audrey de Nazelle5, Ruopeng An6, Leandro M T Garcia7, Shifalika Goenka8, Belen Zapata-Diomedi9, Fiona Bull10, Thiago Herick de Sá11. 1. Sustainable Urbanisation Programme, Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland; Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. 2. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. ISGlobal - Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Sport Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 5. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK. 6. Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, US. 7. Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. 8. Centre for Chronic Disease Control and Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India. 9. Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. 10. Department of Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 11. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: herickdesat@who.int.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to air pollution and physical inactivity are both significant risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). These risk factors are also linked so that the change in exposure in one will impact risks and benefits of the other. These links are well captured in the active transport (walking, cycling) health impact models, in which the increases in active transport leading to increased inhaled dose of air pollution. However, these links are more complex and go beyond the active transport research field. Hence, in this study, we aimed to summarize the empirical evidence on the links between air pollution and physical activity, and their combined effect on individual and population health. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a non-systematic mapping review of empirical and modelling evidence of the possible links between exposure to air pollution and physical activity published until Autumn 2019. We reviewed empirical evidence for the (i) impact of exposure to air pollution on physical activity behaviour, (ii) exposure to air pollution while engaged in physical activity and (iii) the short-term and (iv) long-term health effects of air pollution exposure on people engaged in physical activity. In addition, we reviewed (v) public health modelling studies that have quantified the combined effect of air pollution and physical activity. These broad research areas were identified through expert discussions, including two public events performed in health-related conferences. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The current literature suggests that air pollution may decrease physical activity levels during high air pollution episodes or may prevent people from engaging in physical activity overall in highly polluted environments. Several studies have estimated fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure in active transport environment in Europe and North-America, but the concentration in other regions, places for physical activity and for other air pollutants are poorly understood. Observational epidemiological studies provide some evidence for a possible interaction between air pollution and physical activity for acute health outcomes, while results for long-term effects are mixed with several studies suggesting small diminishing health gains from physical activity due to exposure to air pollution for long-term outcomes. Public health modelling studies have estimated that in most situations benefits of physical activity outweigh the risks of air pollution, at least in the active transport environment. However, overall evidence on all examined links is weak for low- and middle-income countries, for sensitive subpopulations (children, elderly, pregnant women, people with pre-existing conditions), and for indoor air pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity and air pollution are linked through multiple mechanisms, and these relations could have important implications for public health, especially in locations with high air pollution concentrations. Overall, this review calls for international collaboration between air pollution and physical activity research fields to strengthen the evidence base on the links between both and on how policy options could potentially reduce risks and maximise health benefits.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to air pollution and physical inactivity are both significant risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). These risk factors are also linked so that the change in exposure in one will impact risks and benefits of the other. These links are well captured in the active transport (walking, cycling) health impact models, in which the increases in active transport leading to increased inhaled dose of air pollution. However, these links are more complex and go beyond the active transport research field. Hence, in this study, we aimed to summarize the empirical evidence on the links between air pollution and physical activity, and their combined effect on individual and population health. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a non-systematic mapping review of empirical and modelling evidence of the possible links between exposure to air pollution and physical activity published until Autumn 2019. We reviewed empirical evidence for the (i) impact of exposure to air pollution on physical activity behaviour, (ii) exposure to air pollution while engaged in physical activity and (iii) the short-term and (iv) long-term health effects of air pollution exposure on people engaged in physical activity. In addition, we reviewed (v) public health modelling studies that have quantified the combined effect of air pollution and physical activity. These broad research areas were identified through expert discussions, including two public events performed in health-related conferences. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The current literature suggests that air pollution may decrease physical activity levels during high air pollution episodes or may prevent people from engaging in physical activity overall in highly polluted environments. Several studies have estimated fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure in active transport environment in Europe and North-America, but the concentration in other regions, places for physical activity and for other air pollutants are poorly understood. Observational epidemiological studies provide some evidence for a possible interaction between air pollution and physical activity for acute health outcomes, while results for long-term effects are mixed with several studies suggesting small diminishing health gains from physical activity due to exposure to air pollution for long-term outcomes. Public health modelling studies have estimated that in most situations benefits of physical activity outweigh the risks of air pollution, at least in the active transport environment. However, overall evidence on all examined links is weak for low- and middle-income countries, for sensitive subpopulations (children, elderly, pregnant women, people with pre-existing conditions), and for indoor air pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity and air pollution are linked through multiple mechanisms, and these relations could have important implications for public health, especially in locations with high air pollution concentrations. Overall, this review calls for international collaboration between air pollution and physical activity research fields to strengthen the evidence base on the links between both and on how policy options could potentially reduce risks and maximise health benefits.
Authors: Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Michelle Laeremans; Evi Dons; Ione Avila-Palencia; Glòria Carrasco-Turigas; Juan Pablo Orjuela-Mendoza; Esther Anaya-Boig; Tom Cole-Hunter; Audrey DE Nazelle; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Arnout Standaert; Martine VAN Poppel; Patrick DE Boever; Luc Int Panis Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: James F Sallis; Ester Cerin; Terry L Conway; Marc A Adams; Lawrence D Frank; Michael Pratt; Deborah Salvo; Jasper Schipperijn; Graham Smith; Kelli L Cain; Rachel Davey; Jacqueline Kerr; Poh-Chin Lai; Josef Mitáš; Rodrigo Reis; Olga L Sarmiento; Grant Schofield; Jens Troelsen; Delfien Van Dyck; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Neville Owen Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sandra Cortés; Cinthya Leiva; María José Ojeda; Natalia Bustamante-Ara; Wanjiku Wambaa; Alan Dominguez; Carlos Pasten Salvo; Camila Rodriguez Peralta; Bárbara Rojas Arenas; Diego Vargas Mesa; Ericka Ahumada-Padilla Journal: Environ Health Insights Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Leandro Garcia; Rob Johnson; Alex Johnson; Ali Abbas; Rahul Goel; Lambed Tatah; James Damsere-Derry; Elvis Kyere-Gyeabour; Marko Tainio; Thiago H de Sá; James Woodcock Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Sabina Cauci; Michael Tavano; Francesco Curcio; Maria Pia Francescato Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 5.190
Authors: Yu Yu; Michael Jerrett; Kimberly C Paul; Jason Su; I-Fan Shih; Jun Wu; Eunice Lee; Kosuke Inoue; Mary Haan; Beate Ritz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-09-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Michał Zacharko; Robert Cichowicz; Marcin Andrzejewski; Paweł Chmura; Edward Kowalczuk; Jan Chmura; Marek Konefał Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 3.390