| Literature DB >> 35004590 |
Lu Liu1, Kai-Hua Wang2, Yidong Xiao3.
Abstract
This paper discusses the asymmetric effect of air quality (AQ) on stock returns (SR) in China's health industry through the quantile-on-quantile (QQ) regression method. Compared to prior literature, our study provides the following contributions. Government intervention, especially industrial policy, is considered a fresh and essential component of analyzing frameworks in addition to investors' physiology and psychology. Next, because of the heterogeneous responses from different industries to AQ, industrial heterogeneity is thus considered in this paper. In addition, the QQ method examines the effect of specific quantiles between variables and does not consider structural break and temporal lag effects. We obtain the following empirical results. First, the coefficients between AQ and SR in the health service and health technology industries change from positive to negative as AQ deteriorates. Second, AQ always positively influences the health business industry, but the values of the coefficients are larger in good air. In addition, different from other industries, the coefficients in the health equipment industry are negative, but the values of the coefficients change with AQ. The conclusions provide important references for investors and other market participants to avoid biased decisions due to poor AQ and pay attention to government industrial policies.Entities:
Keywords: air quality; health industry; heterogeneity; quantile-on-quantile method; stock return
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004590 PMCID: PMC8733208 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.789510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1The transmission mechanism.
The AQ index classification levels.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 0–50 | Good | There is little risk and the air is not polluted. People are satisfied with this level of air quality. |
| 51–100 | Moderate | Most people find the air acceptable, yet a few people may worry that some pollutants in the air will cause health problems. |
| 101–150 | Unhealthy for sensitive groups | General people will not be seriously affected by this level of air quality, while people with lung disease are exposed with greater risks. |
| 151–200 | Unhealthy | Air quality of this level poses threats to physical health of everyone, and the sensitive groups face greater risks. |
| 201–300 | Very unhealthy | The health condition of every people is seriously affected by the mixture of pollutants in the air. |
| 301–500 | Hazardous | The air quality is intolerant for the entire population, which causes critical health warnings. |
Figure 2The trend of AQ index.
Descriptive statistics of the variables.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQ | 266 | 24 | 35.032 | 1.393 | 5.506 | 1019.027 |
| HS | 0.077 | −0.089 | 0.021 | −0.329 | 4.685 | 251.508 |
| HE | 0.074 | −0.091 | 0.021 | −0.465 | 5.158 | 424.476 |
| HB | 0.069 | −0.093 | 0.017 | −0.568 | 6.505 | 1043.922 |
| HT | 0.095 | −0.103 | 0.018 | −0.747 | 9.049 | 2986.122 |
denotes significance at 1% level.
Figure 3The coefficients between AQ and HS.
Figure 4The coefficients between AQ and HE.
Figure 5The coefficients between AQ and HB.
Figure 6The coefficients between AQ and HT.