Howard S Kim1,2, Jody D Ciolino3, Nicola Lancki3, Kyle J Strickland4, Daniel Pinto5,6, Christine Stankiewicz4, D Mark Courtney7, Bruce L Lambert8, Danielle M McCarthy1,2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 2. Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Department of Rehabilitation Services, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University College of Health Sciences, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. 6. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA. 8. Department of Communication Studies, Center for Communication and Health, Northwestern University School of Communication, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Low back pain accounts for nearly 4 million emergency department (ED) visits annually and is a significant source of disability. Physical therapy has been suggested as a potentially effective nonopioid treatment for low back pain; however, no studies to our knowledge have yet evaluated the emerging resource of ED-initiated physical therapy. The study objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and patients receiving usual care for acute low back pain. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED patients receiving either physical therapy or usual care for acute low back pain from May 1, 2018, to May 24, 2019, at a single academic ED (>91,000 annual visits). The primary outcome was pain-related functioning, assessed with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (PROMIS-PI) scores. The secondary outcome was use of high-risk medications (opioids, benzodiazepines, and skeletal muscle relaxants). Outcomes were compared over 3 months using adjusted linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: For 101 participants (43 receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and 58 receiving usual care), the median age was 40.5 years and 59% were women. Baseline outcome scores in the ED-initiated physical therapy group were higher than those in the usual care group (ODI = 51.1 vs 36.0; PROMIS-PI = 67.6 vs 62.7). Patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy had greater improvements in both ODI and PROMIS-PI scores at the 3-month follow-up (ODI = -14.4 [95% CI = -23.0 to -5.7]; PROMIS-PI = -5.1 [95% CI = -9.9 to -0.4]) and lower use of high-risk medications (odds ratio = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.01 to 0.58]). CONCLUSION: In this single-center observational study, ED-initiated physical therapy for acute low back pain was associated with improvements in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications compared with usual care; the causality of these relationships remains to be explored. IMPACT: ED-initiated physical therapy is a promising therapy for acute low back pain that may reduce reliance on high-risk medications while improving patient-reported outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Emergency department-initiated physical therapy for low back pain was associated with greater improvement in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications over 3 months.
OBJECTIVE: Low back pain accounts for nearly 4 million emergency department (ED) visits annually and is a significant source of disability. Physical therapy has been suggested as a potentially effective nonopioid treatment for low back pain; however, no studies to our knowledge have yet evaluated the emerging resource of ED-initiated physical therapy. The study objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and patients receiving usual care for acute low back pain. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED patients receiving either physical therapy or usual care for acute low back pain from May 1, 2018, to May 24, 2019, at a single academic ED (>91,000 annual visits). The primary outcome was pain-related functioning, assessed with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (PROMIS-PI) scores. The secondary outcome was use of high-risk medications (opioids, benzodiazepines, and skeletal muscle relaxants). Outcomes were compared over 3 months using adjusted linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: For 101 participants (43 receiving ED-initiated physical therapy and 58 receiving usual care), the median age was 40.5 years and 59% were women. Baseline outcome scores in the ED-initiated physical therapy group were higher than those in the usual care group (ODI = 51.1 vs 36.0; PROMIS-PI = 67.6 vs 62.7). Patients receiving ED-initiated physical therapy had greater improvements in both ODI and PROMIS-PI scores at the 3-month follow-up (ODI = -14.4 [95% CI = -23.0 to -5.7]; PROMIS-PI = -5.1 [95% CI = -9.9 to -0.4]) and lower use of high-risk medications (odds ratio = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.01 to 0.58]). CONCLUSION: In this single-center observational study, ED-initiated physical therapy for acute low back pain was associated with improvements in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications compared with usual care; the causality of these relationships remains to be explored. IMPACT: ED-initiated physical therapy is a promising therapy for acute low back pain that may reduce reliance on high-risk medications while improving patient-reported outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Emergency department-initiated physical therapy for low back pain was associated with greater improvement in functioning and lower use of high-risk medications over 3 months.
Authors: Julie M Fritz; John S Magel; Molly McFadden; Carl Asche; Anne Thackeray; Whitney Meier; Gerard Brennan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Howard S Kim; Danielle M McCarthy; Jason A Hoppe; D Mark Courtney; Bruce L Lambert Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Benjamin W Friedman; John Conway; Caron Campbell; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Muhammad Alrwaily; Michael Timko; Michael Schneider; Joel Stevans; Christopher Bise; Karthik Hariharan; Anthony Delitto Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2015-12-04
Authors: Gery P Guy; Kun Zhang; Michele K Bohm; Jan Losby; Brian Lewis; Randall Young; Louise B Murphy; Deborah Dowell Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Lewis E Kazis; Omid Ameli; James Rothendler; Brigid Garrity; Howard Cabral; Christine McDonough; Kathleen Carey; Michael Stein; Darshak Sanghavi; David Elton; Julie Fritz; Robert Saper Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Howard S Kim; Kayla M Muschong; Ivy L Fishman; Jacob M Schauer; Amee L Seitz; Kyle J Strickland; Bruce L Lambert; Danielle M McCarthy; My H Vu; Jody D Ciolino Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.006