HYPOTHESIS: Localized cooling of the external ear has a protective effect on the susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated significant protection from cisplatin-induced hearing loss using cool water ear canal irrigation. However, the study was limited to a single bolus injection of cisplatin and an acute time period. Here, we examined the application of localized cooling of the ear canal with repeated doses of cisplatin, over an expanded period of time, and using two methods of cooling. METHODS: Twenty-four guinea pigs (12 male and 12 female) underwent auditory physiological testing (auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 8-32 kHz) and pre/postadministration of cisplatin. Cisplatin (4 mg/kg i.p.) was administered in 3 weekly single injections for a total of 12 mg/kg. While anesthetized, the left ears of the guinea pigs were exposed to either cool water (22°C; ICS Water Caloric Irrigator), a cool ear bar (15°C, cooled by a Peltier device; TNM, Scion NeuroStim), or left uncooled as a sham control. The animals were tested 3 days post each dosage and 1 month post the final dose. At the end of the experiment the animals were euthanized for histological evaluation. RESULTS: We found that hearing loss was significantly reduced, and hair cell survival greatly improved, in animals that received cooling treatments compared to cisplatin-only control animals. No significant difference was observed between the two methods of cooling. CONCLUSION: Localized cooling of the ear canal during administration of cisplatin mitigated loss of auditory function and loss of hair cells.
HYPOTHESIS: Localized cooling of the external ear has a protective effect on the susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated significant protection from cisplatin-induced hearing loss using cool water ear canal irrigation. However, the study was limited to a single bolus injection of cisplatin and an acute time period. Here, we examined the application of localized cooling of the ear canal with repeated doses of cisplatin, over an expanded period of time, and using two methods of cooling. METHODS: Twenty-four guinea pigs (12 male and 12 female) underwent auditory physiological testing (auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 8-32 kHz) and pre/postadministration of cisplatin. Cisplatin (4 mg/kg i.p.) was administered in 3 weekly single injections for a total of 12 mg/kg. While anesthetized, the left ears of the guinea pigs were exposed to either cool water (22°C; ICS Water Caloric Irrigator), a cool ear bar (15°C, cooled by a Peltier device; TNM, Scion NeuroStim), or left uncooled as a sham control. The animals were tested 3 days post each dosage and 1 month post the final dose. At the end of the experiment the animals were euthanized for histological evaluation. RESULTS: We found that hearing loss was significantly reduced, and hair cell survival greatly improved, in animals that received cooling treatments compared to cisplatin-only control animals. No significant difference was observed between the two methods of cooling. CONCLUSION: Localized cooling of the ear canal during administration of cisplatin mitigated loss of auditory function and loss of hair cells.
Authors: D W Marion; L E Penrod; S F Kelsey; W D Obrist; P M Kochanek; A M Palmer; S R Wisniewski; S T DeKosky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeany M Rademaker-Lakhai; Mirjam Crul; Lot Zuur; Paul Baas; Jos H Beijnen; Yvonne J W Simis; Nico van Zandwijk; Jan H M Schellens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yu-Hsuan Chu; Martha Sibrian-Vazquez; Jorge O Escobedo; Amanda R Phillips; D Thomas Dickey; Qi Wang; Martina Ralle; Peter S Steyger; Robert M Strongin Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.939