Literature DB >> 33351096

Screening for Nasopharyngeal Cancer in High-Risk Populations: A Small Price to Pay for Early Disease Identification?

John R de Almeida1, Scott V Bratman2, Aaron R Hansen3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 33351096      PMCID： PMC8491804          DOI： 10.1093/jnci/djaa199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN： 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Principles of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Marjorie A Rosenberg; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Maureen A Smith; Stephen M Robinson; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Inge M C M De Kok; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.

Authors:  Meng-Kan Chen; Hui-Fang Hung; Stephen Duffy; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Timothy Church; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Robert Bresalier; Gerald L Andriole; Saundra S Buys; E David Crawford; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Christine C Johnson; Douglas J Reding; Barbara O'Brien; Danielle M Carrick; Patrick Wright; Thomas L Riley; Mark P Purdue; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adam J N Raymakers; John Mayo; Stephen Lam; J Mark FitzGerald; David G T Whitehurst; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.561

7.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA to Screen for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  K C Allen Chan; John K S Woo; Ann King; Benny C Y Zee; W K Jacky Lam; Stephen L Chan; Sam W I Chu; Constance Mak; Irene O L Tse; Samantha Y M Leung; Gloria Chan; Edwin P Hui; Brigette B Y Ma; Rossa W K Chiu; Sing-Fai Leung; Andrew C van Hasselt; Anthony T C Chan; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cost-Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening With Epstein-Barr Virus Polymerase Chain Reaction or Serology in High-Incidence Populations Worldwide.

Authors:  Jacob A Miller; Quynh-Thu Le; Benjamin A Pinsky; Hannah Wang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Country-Level Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Initial Estimates and the Need for Further Research.

Authors:  Beth Woods; Paul Revill; Mark Sculpher; Karl Claxton
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.725
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.