Literature DB >> 33351084

Public Opinion Perceptions, Private Support, and Public Actions of US Adults Regarding Gun Safety Policy.

Graham Dixon1, Kelly Garrett1, Mark Susmann2, Brad J Bushman1.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite broad public support for gun safety policies, minimal policy implementation has occurred. Objective: To investigate factors that encourage greater private support for and public action on gun safety policy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three studies were conducted: a public opinion survey (Study 1) was conducted from January 8 to 22, 2019, and 2 experiments (Studies 2 and 3) were conducted from August 27 to October 17, 2019, and April 15 to 21, 2020, respectively. Adults living in the US were eligible to participate in Studies 1 and 3. Students 18 years and older participating in a research experience program were eligible to participate in Study 2. Study 1 was administered online by Ipsos, a market research company. A nationally representative sample of 1000 US adults was obtained from Ipsos' online KnowledgePanel, of whom 508 completed the public opinion survey. For Study 2, which was conducted in a university laboratory, 354 participants were recruited from a university research pool, all of whom completed the study. Study 3 was administered online by the market research company YouGov, which identified 727 US gun owners from its opt-in panel, from which it constructed a census-matched sample of 400 participants. Exposures: Participants read a statement about the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Content was manipulated as a 2 (corrective information vs no corrective information) × 2 (system changeable vs system not changeable) between-subjects factorial design with random assignment. The corrective information included polling data highlighting widespread support among gun owners for several gun safety policies. System changeable described gun safety policies passed by Florida's legislature. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were support for gun safety policies and public disclosure of support.
Results: The 3 studies included a total of 1262 participants (Study 1: 508 participants; weighted mean [SD] age, 47.7 [17.5] years; 261.9 women [51.6%]; 82.5 Hispanic [16.2%] and 60.3 Black [11.9%]; Study 2: 354 participants; mean [SD] age, 20.0 [2.3] years; 232 women [65.9%]; 100 Asian [28.3%] and 37 Black [10.5%]; Study 3: 400 participants; weighted mean [SD] age, 52.1 [16.4] years; 187.3 women [46.8%]; 295.5 White [73.9%], 44.5 Hispanic [11.1%], and 32.4 Black [8.1%]). Study 1 found that 63% to 91% of gun owners and 83% to 93% of non-gun owners supported key gun safety policies, yet both groups significantly underestimated gun owners' support for these policies by between 12% and 31%. Studies 2 and 3 found that exposure to corrective information was associated with a small increase in support for 2 gun safety policies of between 4% and 15%, both in terms of participants' privately held beliefs and the beliefs they would be willing to share publicly. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that many US adults failed to recognize that most gun owners support key gun safety policies. Correcting this misperception was associated with greater private and public support for gun safety policy.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33351084      PMCID: PMC7756237          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  6 in total

1.  Ostracism.

Authors:  Kipling D Williams
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non-Gun Owners in 2017.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Daniel W Webster; Elizabeth Stone; Cassandra K Crifasi; Jon S Vernick; Emma E McGinty
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Experimental Evidence for Minorities' Hesitancy in Reporting Their Opinions: The Roles of Optimal Distinctiveness Needs and Normative Influence.

Authors:  Kimberly Rios; Zhuoren Chen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-03-27

4.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

Authors:  D A Prentice; D T Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-02

5.  Change we can believe in: using perceptions of changeability to promote system-change motives over system-justification motives in information search.

Authors:  India R Johnson; Kentaro Fujita
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-06

6.  Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be.

Authors:  Aaron C Kay; Danielle Gaucher; Jennifer M Peach; Kristin Laurin; Justin Friesen; Mark P Zanna; Steven J Spencer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-09
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  COVID-19-Related Discrimination Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities and Other Marginalized Communities in the United States.

Authors:  Paula D Strassle; Anita L Stewart; Stephanie M Quintero; Jackie Bonilla; Alia Alhomsi; Verónica Santana-Ufret; Ana I Maldonado; Allana T Forde; Anna María Nápoles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Correcting misperceptions of gun policy support can foster intergroup cooperation between gun owners and non-gun owners.

Authors:  Mark W Susmann; Graham N Dixon; Brad J Bushman; R Kelly Garrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Trust in COVID-19 information sources and perceived risk among smokers: A nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Reed M Reynolds; Scott R Weaver; Amy L Nyman; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effectiveness of value-based messages to engage gun owners on firearm policies: a three-stage nested study.

Authors:  Claire Boine; Michael Siegel; Abdine Maiga
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2022-10-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.