Literature DB >> 33349248

Impact of simulation-based teamwork training on COVID-19 distress in healthcare professionals.

Anna Beneria1,2, Mireia Arnedo2, Sofia Contreras2,3, Marco Pérez-Carrasco2,3, Itziar Garcia-Ruiz2,4, Mónica Rodríguez-Carballeira2, Joaquim Raduà5,6,7,8, Jordi Bañeras Rius9,10.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Non-technical skills such as leadership, communication, or situation awareness should lead to effective teamwork in a crisis. This study aimed to analyse the role of these skills in the emotional response of health professionals to the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: Before the COVID-19 outbreak, 48 doctors and 48 nurses participated in a simulation-based teamwork training program based on teaching non-technical skills through simulation. In May 2020, this group of professionals from a COVID-19 referral hospital was invited to participate in a survey exploring stress, anxiety, and depression, using the PSS-14 (Perceived Stress Scale) and the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) measures. A control group that did not receive the training was included. We conducted a logistic regression to assess whether having attended a simulation-based teamwork training program modified the probability of presenting psychological distress (PSS-14 > 18 or HADS> 12).
RESULTS: A total of 141 healthcare professionals were included, 77 in the intervention group and 64 in the control group. Based on the PSS-14, 70.1% of the intervention group and 75% of the control group (p = 0.342) had symptoms of stress. Having contact with COVID-19 patients [OR 4.16(1.64-10.52)]; having minors in charge [OR 2.75 (1.15-6.53)]; working as a doctor [0.39(0.16-0.95)], and being a woman [OR 2.94(1.09-7.91)] were related with PSS14 symptoms. Based on the HADS, 54.6% of the intervention group and 42.2% of the control group (p = 0.346) had symptoms of anxiety or depression. Having contact with COVID-19 patients [OR 2.17(1.05-4.48)] and having minors in charge [OR 2.14(1.06-4.32)] were related to HADS symptoms. Healthcare professionals who attended COVID-19 patients showed higher levels of anxiety and depression [OR 2.56(1.03-6.36) (p = 0.043)].
CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals trained in non-technical skills through simulation tended towards higher levels of anxiety and depression and fewer levels of stress, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID19 distress; Healthcare workers wellbeing; Simulation and teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33349248      PMCID: PMC7751744          DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02427-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Educ        ISSN: 1472-6920            Impact factor:   2.463


  22 in total

1.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

2.  Impact of Human Disasters and COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health: Potential of Digital Psychiatry.

Authors:  Krešimir Ćosić; Siniša Popović; Marko Šarlija; Ivan Kesedžić
Journal:  Psychiatr Danub       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.063

3.  [Reducing stress levels and anxiety in primary-care physicians through training and practice of a mindfulness meditation technique].

Authors:  Clemente Franco Justo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Comparison of Psychophysiological Stress in Physiotherapy Students Undertaking Simulation and Hospital-Based Clinical Education.

Authors:  Belinda Karyn Judd; Jennifer Ailsey Alison; Donna Waters; Christopher James Gordon
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 6.  The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Yasuharu Okuda; Ethan O Bryson; Samuel DeMaria; Lisa Jacobson; Joshua Quinones; Bing Shen; Adam I Levine
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2009-08

7.  Relationship between non-technical skills and technical performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: does stress have an influence?

Authors:  Ralf Krage; Laura Zwaan; Lian Tjon Soei Len; Mark W Kolenbrander; Dick van Groeningen; Stephan A Loer; Cordula Wagner; Patrick Schober
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China.

Authors:  Wen-Rui Zhang; Kun Wang; Lu Yin; Wen-Feng Zhao; Qing Xue; Mao Peng; Bao-Quan Min; Qing Tian; Hai-Xia Leng; Jia-Lin Du; Hong Chang; Yuan Yang; Wei Li; Fang-Fang Shangguan; Tian-Yi Yan; Hui-Qing Dong; Ying Han; Yu-Ping Wang; Fiammetta Cosci; Hong-Xing Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 17.659

9.  Doctor, are you healthy? A cross-sectional investigation of oncologist burnout, depression, and anxiety and an investigation of their associated factors.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Beatriz Parreira Martins; Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Psychological impact of the 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Sang Min Lee; Won Sub Kang; Ah-Rang Cho; Tae Kim; Jin Kyung Park
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.735

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Novel Approach for Engagement in Team Training in High-Technology Surgery: The Robotic-Assisted Surgery Olympics.

Authors:  Tara N Cohen; Jennifer T Anger; Falisha F Kanji; Jennifer Zamudio; Elise DeForest; Connor Lusk; Ray Avenido; Christine Yoshizawa; Stephanie Bartkowicz; Lynne S Nemeth; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.243

2.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Nurses and Auxiliary Nursing Care Technicians-A Voluntary Online Survey.

Authors:  Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez; J Ángel García-Álvarez; Esperanza García-Marín; María Gutierrez-Serrano; Maria José M Alférez; Guillermo Ramirez-Vargas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Construct Validity and Differential Item Functioning of the PHQ-9 Among Health Care Workers: Rasch Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Surin Jiraniramai; Tinakon Wongpakaran; Chaisiri Angkurawaranon; Wichuda Jiraporncharoen; Nahathai Wongpakaran
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.570

4.  Prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, and perceived stress and their relation with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Seyedeh Yasamin Parvar; Narges Ghamari; Fatemehsadat Pezeshkian; Reza Shahriarirad
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  The Psychological Impact of the Tertiary Hospital Reappraisal on Resident Doctors in the Post-pandemic Era: A Cross-sectional Study in Ningbo.

Authors:  Zhonghao Shao; Angyang Cao; Wenjun Luo; Yanling Zhou; Jianhua Wang; Yu Gui; Bin Gao; Zhipeng Xu; Binbin Zhu; Zhiren Sheng
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  WhatsApp-Delivered Intervention for Continued Learning for Nurses in Pakistan During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sara Rizvi Jafree; Rubeena Zakar; Nasim Rafiq; Ambreen Javed; Rana Rubab Durrani; Syeda Khadija Burhan; Syed Mujtaba Hasnain Nadir; Fatima Ali; Aimen Shahid; Ain Ul Momina; Kamil J Wrona; Qaisar Khalid Mahmood; Florian Fischer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 7.  Are Organizational Interventions Effective in Protecting Healthcare Worker Mental Health during Epidemics/Pandemics? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nektaria Nicolakakis; Maude Lafantaisie; Marie-Claude Letellier; Caroline Biron; Michel Vézina; Nathalie Jauvin; Maryline Vivion; Mariève Pelletier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.