| Literature DB >> 33348429 |
Adrian Post1, Dion Groothof1, Joëlle C Schutten1, Jose L Flores-Guerrero1, J Casper Swarte1, Rianne M Douwes1, Ido P Kema2, Rudolf A de Boer3, Erwin Garcia4, Marge A Connelly4, Theo Wallimann5, Robin P F Dullaart1, Casper F M Franssen1, Stephan J L Bakker1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is associated with both impaired insulin action at target tissues and impaired insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction may play a role in both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. Plasma creatine has been proposed as a potential marker for mitochondrial dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the association between plasma creatine and incident type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: creatine; general population; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2021 PMID: 33348429 PMCID: PMC8048485 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ISSN: 0300-0664 Impact factor: 3.478
FIGURE 1Mirror histogram displaying the sex‐based differences in plasma creatine. Mean plasma creatine is 42.7 ± 17.7 μmol/L in females and 30.4 ± 15.1 μmol/L in males. p for difference <.001
Baseline characteristics
| Variables | Total cohort ( | Males ( | Females ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma creatine, µmol/L | 36.7 ± 17.6 | 30.4 ± 15.1 | 42.7 ± 17.7 | <.001 |
| Age, years | 52 ± 11 | 53 ± 12 | 52 ± 11 | <.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.4 ± 4.2 | 26.6 ± 3.7 | 26.2 ± 4.7 | .007 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 91.1 ± 12.4 | 96.2 ± 10.7 | 86.3 ± 12.0 | <.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 125 ± 18 | 129 ± 17 | 121 ± 18 | <.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 73 ± 9 | 76 ± 9 | 70 ± 8 | <.001 |
| NT‐ProBNP, ng/L | 40 [20–75] | 27 [13–54] | 52 [31–87] | <.001 |
| Plasma creatinine, µmol/L | 72.0 ± 14.4 | 79.8 ± 14.0 | 64.7 ± 10.4 | <.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2 | 94 ± 16 | 94 ± 17 | 94 ± 16 | .50 |
| Urinary albumin excretion, mg/24‐h | 8.5 [6.0–14.6] | 9.4 [6.6–17.9] | 7.7 [5.7–12.2] | <.001 |
| Parental history of T2D, | 625 (15) | 279 (13) | 346 (16) | .07 |
| Smoking status, current | 1201 (28) | 574 (27) | 627 (28) | .63 |
| Alcohol intake, | 3316 (77) | 1755 (84) | 1561 (70) | <.001 |
| Antihypertensive drugs, | 727 (17) | 376 (18) | 351 (16) | .06 |
| Lipid lower drugs, | 298 (8) | 163 (9) | 135 (7) | .005 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 5.4 ± 1.1 | .82 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | <.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.1 [0.8–1.6] | 1.2 [0.9–1.8] | 1.0 [0.7 ‐0 1.4] | <.001 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 4.9 ± 0.6 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | <.001 |
| Insulin, mU/L | 7.9 [5.7–11.7] | 8.4 [6.0–12.2] | 7.6 [5.5–10.9] | <.001 |
| HOMA‐IR | 2.1 [1.6–3.1] | 2.2 [1.6–3.2] | 2.0 [1.5–3.0] | <.001 |
| HOMA‐Beta | 125 [94–176] | 124 [92–177] | 126 [95 ‐176] | .58 |
Data on HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐Beta are only reported in a subset of the participants with a fasting glucose >4.5 mmol/L and a fasting insulin >5 mU/L (n = 2690).
Multivariable linear regression analyses of plasma creatine with selected variables
| Dependent variables | Total cohort ( |
| Males ( | Females ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Std. β (95% CI) |
| Std. β (95% CI) |
| Std. β (95% CI) |
| ||
| Age, years | 0.17 (0.13; 0.20) | <.001 | .04 | 0.20 (0.15; 0.26) | <.001 | 0.14 (0.10; 0.18) | <.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.19 (0.16; 0.22) | <.001 | .08 | 0.24 (0.20; 0.28) | <.001 | 0.16 (0.11; 0.20) | <.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 0.17 (0.14; 0.20) | <.001 | <.001 | 0.24 (0.20; 0.28) | <.001 | 0.13 (0.09; 0.16) | <.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 0.05 (0.02; 0.07) | .001 | .09 | 0.09 (0.05; 0.13) | <.001 | 0.01 (−0.02; 0.05) | .46 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 0.09 (0.06; 0.12) | <.001 | .001 | 0.14 (0.10; 0.19) | <.001 | 0.05 (0.01; 0.09) | .01 |
| NT‐ProBNP, ng/L | −0.11 (−0.13; −0.08) | <.001 | .16 | −0.11 (−0.16; −0.07) | <.001 | −0.10 (−0.13; −0.06) | <.001 |
| Plasma creatinine, µmol/L | −0.18 (−0.20; −0.15) | <.001 | .62 | −0.17 (−0.21; −0.13) | <.001 | −0.18 (−0.22; −0.15) | <.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2 | 0.15 (0.13; 0.18) | <.001 | .76 | 0.16 (0.12; 0.20) | <.001 | 0.15 (0.12; 0.18) | <.001 |
| Urinary albumin excretion, mg/24‐h | 0.08 (0.05; 0.11) | <.001 | <.001 | 0.19 (0.14; 0.24) | <.001 | 0.05 (0.01; 0.08) | .009 |
| Parental history of T2D, | 0.02 (0.01;0.03) | .001 | .51 | 0.01 (−0.01; 0.03) | .10 | 0.02 (0.01; 0.04) | .006 |
| Smoking status, current | 0.07 (0.05; 0.09) | <.001 | <.001 | 0.07 (0.05; 0.09) | <.001 | 0.03 (0.02; 0.05) | <.001 |
| Alcohol intake, | 0.01 (−0.01; 0.02) | .75 | .01 | 0.02 (0.01; 0.04) | .02 | −0.01 (−0.04; 0.01) | .23 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.10 (0.07; 0.14) | <.001 | .49 | 0.13 (0.08; 0.18) | <.001 | 0.09 (0.05; 0.13) | <.001 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | −0.10 (−0.13; −0.08) | <.001 | .01 | −0.15 (−0.19; −0.11) | <.001 | −0.07 (−0.11; −0.03) | <.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.14 (0.11; 0.17) | <.001 | .03 | 0.20 (0.15; 0.26) | <.001 | 0.09 (0.06; 0.13) | <.001 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 0.10 (0.07; 0.13) | <.001 | .05 | 0.15 (0.10; 0.20) | <.001 | 0.07 (0.03; 0.11) | <.001 |
| Insulin, mU/L | 0.15 (0.12; 0.18) | <.001 | .76 | 0.20 (0.15; 0.25) | <.001 | 0.11 (0.07; 0.15) | <.001 |
| HOMA‐IR | 0.12 (0.08; 0.16) | <.001 | .43 | 0.14 (0.08; 0.20) | <.001 | 0.10 (0.05; 0.15) | <.001 |
| HOMA‐Beta | 0.06 (0.02; 0.10) | .006 | .69 | 0.04 (−0.02; 0.11) | .17 | 0.05 (0.01; 0.08) | .01 |
All models are adjusted for age and sex. Unless otherwise stated, analyses are performed on imputed data sets.
Log2 transformed for analyses.
Data on HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐Beta are only reported in a subset of the participants with a fasting glucose >4.5 mmol/L and a fasting insulin >5 mU/L (n = 2690).
Prospective associations of plasma creatine with risk of type 2 diabetes
| Total population | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per 1‐SD | Per 1‐SD | Per 1‐SD | ||||
| HR [95% CI] |
| HR [95% CI] |
| HR [95% CI] |
| |
| Model 1 | 1.32 [1.18–1.48] | <.001 | 1.69 [1.49–1.97] | <.001 | 1.29 [1.07–1.56] | .009 |
| Model 2 | 1.44 [1.27–1.62] | <.001 | 1.62 [1.39–1.88] | <.001 | 1.22 [1.00–1.49] | .05 |
| Model 3 | 1.28 [1.13–1.46] | <.001 | 1.41 [1.19–1.67] | <.001 | 1.11 [0.91–1.35] | .29 |
| Model 4 | 1.26 [1.11–1.44] | <.001 | 1.37 [1.14–1.64] | <.001 | 1.12 [0.91–1.37] | .29 |
| Model 5 | 1.28 [1.12–1.46] | <.001 | 1.37 [1.14–1.64] | <.001 | 1.14 [0.93–1.41] | .21 |
| Model 6 | 1.20 [1.05–1.36] | .008 | 1.31 [1.09–1.58] | .004 | 1.07 [0.87–1.32] | .50 |
| Model 7 | 1.19 [1.04–1.36] | .01 | 1.35 [1.12–1.63] | .002 | 1.10 [0.89–1.34] | .38 |
| Model 8 | 1.23 [1.08–1.40] | .002 | 1.39 [1.16–1.67] | <.001 | 1.07 [0.88–1.32] | .49 |
| Participants |
|
|
| |||
| Events |
|
|
| |||
Model 1: crude. Model 2: adjusted for age and sex. Model 3; as model 2, additionally adjusted for BMI. Model 4, as model 3, additionally adjusted for eGFR and urinary albumin excretion. Model 5, as model 4, additionally adjusted for systolic blood pressure and NT‐ProBNP. Model 6, as model 4, additionally adjusted for total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Model 7, as model 4, additionally adjusted for parental history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake and smoking status. Model 8, as model 4, additionally adjusted for plasma glucose and plasma insulin. The italic values represent the number of participants and events in the analyses.
FIGURE 2Graphical representation of the association of plasma creatine and type 2 diabetes in males and females. The lines show the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and the shaded area corresponds to the 95% pointwise confidence interval (CI). The analyses were stratified for sex and adjusted for age and BMI. p‐effect is .29 and <.001 in females and males, respectively
Prospective associations of plasma creatine with risk of type 2 diabetes with adjustments for HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐β
| Total population | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per 1‐SD | Per 1‐SD | Per 1‐SD | ||||
| HR [95% CI] |
| HR [95% CI] |
| HR [95% CI] |
| |
| Model 1 | 1.18 [1.02–1.36] | .03 | 1.37 [1.12–1.67] | .002 | 1.00 [0.80–1.24] | .97 |
| Model 2 | 1.17 [1.01–1.36] | .03 | 1.37 [1.13–1.67] | .002 | 0.97 [0.78–1.22] | .82 |
| Model 3 | 1.19 [1.03–1.37] | .02 | 1.37 [1.13–1.67] | .002 | 1.01 [0.81–1.26] | .95 |
| Model 4 | 1.20 [1.04–1.39] | .01 | 1.40 [1.15–1.70] | .001 | 1.01 [0.81–1.26] | .92 |
| Participants |
|
|
| |||
| Events |
|
|
| |||
Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, eGFR and urinary albumin excretion. Model 2, as model 1, additionally adjusted for HOMA‐IR. Model 3, as model 1, additionally adjusted for HOMA‐β. Model 4, as model 1, additionally adjusted for HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐β. The italic values represent the number of participants and events in the analyses.