BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess in our institutional experience the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of salivary gland masses (SGM) according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and to an in-house system. METHODS: The study included 189 FNACs conducted between January 2011 and December 2019. The FNACs, classified according to the in-house system, were reclassified according the MSRSGC. Taking histopathology as gold standard, the measures of diagnostic accuracy of FNAC were determined for suspicion for malignancy (SFM) and malignant categories. RESULTS: According to the in house system, FNAC diagnoses were classified as: 23 (12.2%) non-diagnostic (ND), 23 (12.2%) non-neoplastic (NN), 119 (62.9%) benign neoplasm (BN), 10 (5.2%) indefinite neoplasm (IN), 2 (1.1%) SFM, and 12 (6.4%) malignant (M). Based on the MSRSGC, there were 3 (1.5%) cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and 7 (3.7%) neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP). The number of ND, NN, BN, SFM, and M cases were identical in the two systems. For both systems, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy for malignancy diagnosis were 77.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.6%, and 97.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the MSRGC and to our in-house reporting system, FNAC is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of malignant salivary tumors with excellent specificity and good sensitivity. However, MSRGC has the advantage of standardization of salivary gland cytology reporting.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess in our institutional experience the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of salivary gland masses (SGM) according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and to an in-house system. METHODS: The study included 189 FNACs conducted between January 2011 and December 2019. The FNACs, classified according to the in-house system, were reclassified according the MSRSGC. Taking histopathology as gold standard, the measures of diagnostic accuracy of FNAC were determined for suspicion for malignancy (SFM) and malignant categories. RESULTS: According to the in house system, FNAC diagnoses were classified as: 23 (12.2%) non-diagnostic (ND), 23 (12.2%) non-neoplastic (NN), 119 (62.9%) benign neoplasm (BN), 10 (5.2%) indefinite neoplasm (IN), 2 (1.1%) SFM, and 12 (6.4%) malignant (M). Based on the MSRSGC, there were 3 (1.5%) cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and 7 (3.7%) neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP). The number of ND, NN, BN, SFM, and M cases were identical in the two systems. For both systems, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy for malignancy diagnosis were 77.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.6%, and 97.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the MSRGC and to our in-house reporting system, FNAC is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of malignant salivary tumors with excellent specificity and good sensitivity. However, MSRGC has the advantage of standardization of salivary gland cytology reporting.
Authors: Grayson G Cole; Cláudia M Salgado; Danielle Vargas de Stefano; Eduardo V Zambrano; Ana M Gómez; Miguel Reyes-Múgica; Qian Wang Journal: Head Neck Pathol Date: 2022-09-28