Literature DB >> 33346929

Experimental infection of cats with Cystoisospora felis.

Andrea V Scorza1, Phyllis Tyrrell2, Sara Wennogle1, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar2, Michael R Lappin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cystoisospora felis is a common parasite of cats and is diagnosed by fecal flotation, but false-negative results can be common. HYPOTHESIS/
OBJECTIVES: To experimentally inoculate cats with C. felis oocysts, to compare fecal flotation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results, and to describe any clinical signs consistent with infection. ANIMALS: Six cats.
METHODS: Cystoisospora felis oocysts were identified morphologically from feces of a naturally infected kitten with diarrhea, sporulated oocysts (5000) were inoculated to 6 cats that were negative for fecal parasites by fecal flotation and by a fluorescent antibody assay (FA) for Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. Cats were observed daily for the presence of clinical signs consistent with infection. Fecal samples were evaluated by fecal flotation and FA up to 3 times per week post inoculation (PI) to Day 27. Thirty-six samples collected before inoculation and from Days 8, 10, 13, 15, and 20 PI were assayed using an internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) PCR that amplifies DNA of C. felis.
RESULTS: All cats were negative for C. felis by both assays before inoculation. All cats shed C. felis oocysts by Day 10 PI, oocysts were not detected by fecal flotation after Day 15 PI. Cystoisospora felis DNA was amplified from 24/36 (66.6%) fecal samples from 6/6 (100%) of the cats. Oocysts were not detected by fecal flotation in 4 of the samples that were positive for C. felis DNA by PCR. Clinical signs were not recognized in any of the study cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Fecal flotation is a convenient assay for detection of C. felis but could occasionally give false-negative results when compared to this ITS1 PCR.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoisospora felis; ITS-1 PCR; cats; clinical signs; fecal flotation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33346929      PMCID: PMC7848389          DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.175


deoxyribonucleic acid fluorescent antibody assay internal transcribed spacer 1 polymerase chain reaction post inoculation

INTRODUCTION

Cystoisospora spp. (previously Isospora spp.) are protozoan parasites that belong to the coccidian group, are strictly host specific and have worldwide distribution. , Cats are definitive hosts for Cystoisospora felis and Cystoisospora rivolta. Cats acquire Cystoisospora spp. by ingestion of sporulated oocysts from the environment or by ingestion of tissues of another infected paratenic vertebrate host. The infection can also occur after ingestion of paratenic hosts such as flies, cockroaches, or dung beetles that have ingested sporulated oocysts. , After ingestion, the enteroepithelial phase occurs in the small intestine of infected cats and results in the passage of unsporulated oocysts in feces. The prepatent periods for C. felis and C. rivolta are 7 to 11 days and 4 to 7 days, respectively. The patent periods for C. felis and C. rivolta are 10 to 11 days and 14 or more days, respectively. The numbers of oocysts shed can vary considerably by individual animal. Clinical disease associated with Cystoisospora spp. infections occurs most commonly in young, debilitated and immunosuppressed animals. Diagnosis of coccidiosis is performed by demonstration of oocysts in fecal samples by microscopic examination after fecal flotation. However, cats with or without clinical signs of disease can pass Cystoisospora spp. oocysts, so the finding of oocysts does not prove a disease association. Cystoisospora felis is commonly believed to induce diarrhea in kittens but few experimental data are available from young adult cats. The aims of this study were to experimentally inoculate cats with C. felis oocysts isolated from a naturally infected kitten, to compare the results of fecal flotation and a conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for their ability to detect C. felis, and to describe any clinical findings consistent with infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source of oocysts

Oocysts consistent with the structure of C. felis were identified morphologically and then concentrated from the feces of a naturally infected kitten with diarrhea. No other parasites were detected after sugar centrifugal flotation and by assessment of a commercially available fluorescent antibody assay (FA) for Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. (Merifluor Crypto/Giardia kit, Meridian Diagnostic Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio).

Experimental inoculation

Six domestic short‐hair cats (8 months old) were purchased from a commercial breeder, housed individually, and shown to be negative for fecal parasites on 3 different samples collected a week before inoculation. An inoculum containing a total of 5000 C. felis sporulated oocysts was then administered to each cat by stomach tube while sedated. Food was withheld for 24 hours and then the cats were fed a commercial feline diet ad libitum and observed daily for the presence of gastrointestinal signs such as inappetance, vomiting, or diarrhea. The protocol for animal use in this project was approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The title of the protocol was: “Establishment of Cryptosporidium felis and Isospora felis infection in experimentally inoculated cats,” IACUC Protocol 12‐3323A and it was originally approved on April 20, 2012.

Assays performed

Fecal samples were evaluated by fecal flotation (1 g) and by FA (1 g) up to 3 times per week post inoculation (PI) to Day 27. An oocyst score was assigned after fecal flotation: Score 0 = 0 oocysts (per slide); Score 1 = 1 to 250 oocysts; Score 2 = 250 to 500 oocysts; Score 3 = greater than 500. A total of 36 samples (6 from each cat) collected before inoculation and from Days 8, 10, 13, 15, and 20 PI were assayed using an internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) PCR assay designed by IDEXX laboratories. DNA was isolated from fecal samples using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Polymerase chain reaction primers C. felis ITS1 fp (5′ CTACTGAATCCCATAATCAGGAC 3′) and C. felis ITS1 rp (5′ CCAAAATCTCAAGGAGATAGGAG 3′) amplified a 224 base pair fragment of the C. felis ITS1 sequence (EU124689). The reactions contained 25 pmol of each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa), 2.2 U of ActiTaq exo DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), 200 μM of each dNTP (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and 2 mM of MgCl2 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in a final volume of 50 μL. Cycling conditions for the assay consisted of a pre‐incubation step (95°C for 10 minutes) and 50 amplification cycles (95°C for 20 seconds, 55°C for 20 seconds, 72°C for 20 seconds). Analytical specificity was determined by the specificity of the primers and by testing a panel of DNA from common feline parasites. Deoxyribonucleic acid from various Giardia duodenalis isolates (Assemblages F and D), Cryptosporidium spp. (Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, and other Cryptosporidium species isolated from mouse, and wild felids) and Toxoplasma gondii were tested by the ITS1 PCR. A cat fecal sample that tested positive for C. felis by fecal flotation and by PCR was used to calculate the analytical sensitivity. Five fold serial dilutions were prepared from this sample, from 30 oocyts/g of feces to 0.93 oocysts/g of feces, in PCR water. Multiple titrations were performed to detect analytical sensitivity. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated using Fecal flotation (FF) as a gold standard. Sequencing analysis was performed in the samples with discordant fecal float and PCR results. Deoxyribonucleic acid sequences were analyzed in forward and reverse directions using an ABI3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). The sequence data from C. felis isolates by ITS1 gene was compared by BLAST analysis with sequences from the nucleotide database from the GenBank.

RESULTS

All cats were negative for C. felis by both assays before inoculation. After C. felis inoculation, 20 of 30 fecal samples tested were positive for C. felis oocysts by FF. Oocysts were seen in feces by FF on 4 of 6 cats on Day 8 PI (Score 1), on all 6 cats on Days 10 PI (Score 3) and 13 PI (Scores 1‐3), and on 4 of 6 cats on Day 15 PI (Score 1). For all other time points assessed (Days 17, 20, 22, 23, and 27), all cats were negative after fecal flotation. After C. felis inoculation, 24 of 30 fecal samples tested were positive for C. felis DNA in feces. Cystoisospora felis DNA was amplified from feces from 5 of 6 cats on Day 8 PI, from all 6 cats on Days 10 and 13 PI, and on 5 of 6 cats by Day 15 PI. On Day 20 PI, C. felis DNA was amplified from 2 out of the 6 cats. Oocysts were not detected in 4 of the selected samples that were positive for C. felis DNA (Days 8, 15, and 20). The specificity of the primers was determined by BLAST analysis and they matched C. felis (EU124689 and HK 430064.1) sequences. Deoxyribonucleic acid from various G. duodenalis isolates (Assemblages F and D), Cryptosporidium spp. (C parvum, C ubiquitum and other Cryptosporidium species isolated from mouse, and wild felids), and T. gondii was not amplified by the ITS1 PCR. The ITS1 PCR assay consistently detected up to the 1.78 oocysts/g of feces. Considering that only 300 μL of sample are used in the DNA extraction, the detection limit of the assay is below 1 oocyst. The 4 PCR positive FF negative samples tested showed 100% homology to 2 C. felis isolates (MK430064 and EU124689) by BLAST analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of FF (defined at the gold standard) in comparison to ITS1 PCR assay were 100% and 75%, respectively. Clinical signs were not recognized in any of the cats.

DISCUSSION

Fecal flotation is the most commonly used technique for detection of Cystoisospora spp. oocysts in cat feces. To the best of our knowledge, the minimum detection limit of Cystoisospora spp. oocysts by fecal flotation has not been reported. Polymerase chain reaction has been used to amplify DNA of a variety of fecal parasites in cats and some assays could be more sensitive than microscopy. , In this study, oocysts were not detected in 4 of the selected samples that were positive for C. felis DNA. These 4 samples could be considered false PCR positives or true PCR positives. Each PCR was run with DNA extraction negative controls in addition to positive (Cystoisospora spp. DNA) and negative PCR (water) controls, since the results of the controls worked as expected, we believe that these discordant results were not false‐positive PCR results. The DNA sequencing of the C. felis ITS1 amplicons for the discordant samples confirmed the presence of C. felis DNA. Cystoisospora shedding is variable between animals; maybe the number of oocysts shed was below the threshold of detection of the FF. The detection limit of this PCR assay is below 1 C. felis oocyst, and C. felis DNA can be detected in feces in the absence of intact cysts, so we believe that these results are true PCR positives. The primers used in the PCR in the study were specific for C. felis. The specificity of the primers was determined by BLAST analysis, by assessment of DNA of other feline parasites and DNA sequencing of the amplicons. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Cystoisospora spp. in cats is not routinely used but in certain situations can be useful. The ITS1 is commonly used as a biomarker of Cystoisospora spp. due to its high copy number element and represents a promising target for diagnosis. Amplification of the 18S rRNA and ITS1 genes for detection of Cystoisospora spp. infections was previously used for research purposes in dogs and cats. , , False‐negative fecal flotation results in cats with diarrhea are infrequent. Previous studies showed that several PCR assays were more sensitive than microscopy, so we assumed that false‐negative PCR results will also be uncommon. , However, in some cases clinical signs precede oocysts shedding and so a second sample might be examined to prove infection. Conversely, false‐negative fecal float results could also occur, if the sample was not collected during the shedding period or if the shedding was below the detection limit of the fecal flotation. C. felis induces shedding of T. gondii oocysts in cats chronically infected with T. gondii in the absence of clinical signs. The number of C. felis oocysts shedding varied among individuals, so this assay could be useful for monitoring T. gondii chronically infected cats for detection of C. felis infections. The ITS1 target can also be included as part of a multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of various fecal parasites. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and predictive values need to now be evaluated in samples from naturally infected cats. In regard to clinical signs, young adult cats orally inoculated with C. felis sporulated oocysts in this model developed self‐limiting, subclinical infections. This finding is consistent with previous research that showed that C. felis is not a significant primary pathogen in cats over 1 month of age.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION

Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION

Approved by the Colorado State University IACUC (IACUC Protocol 12‐3323A).

HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION

Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Update on the diagnosis and management of Isospora spp infections in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Michael R Lappin
Journal:  Top Companion Anim Med       Date:  2010-08

2.  Cystoisospora spp. from dogs in China and phylogenetic analysis of its 18S and ITS1 gene.

Authors:  Pengfei He; Jianhua Li; Pengtao Gong; Jingui Huang; Xichen Zhang
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Sheep may not be an important zoonotic reservoir for Cryptosporidium and Giardia parasites.

Authors:  Una M Ryan; Caroline Bath; Ian Robertson; Carolyn Read; Aileen Elliot; Linda McInnes; Rebecca Traub; Brown Besier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Phylogenetic analysis of Cystoisospora species at the rRNA ITS1 locus and development of a PCR-RFLP assay.

Authors:  Bimba Samarasinghe; Johanna Johnson; Una Ryan
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.011

5.  Dung beetles, Onthophagus spp., as potential transport hosts of feline coccidia.

Authors:  Y Saitoh; H Itagaki
Journal:  Nihon Juigaku Zasshi       Date:  1990-04

6.  Prevalence and genotypic characterisation of Giardia in dairy calves from Western Australia and Western Canada.

Authors:  R M O'Handley; M E Olson; D Fraser; P Adams; R C Thompson
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Phylogenetic identification of Cystoisospora spp. from dogs, cats, and raccoon dogs in Japan.

Authors:  Makoto Matsubayashi; Ramon A Carreno; Hiroyuki Tani; Ryusaku Yoshiuchi; Takenori Kanai; Isao Kimata; Shigehiko Uni; Masaru Furuya; Kazumi Sasai
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  Biology of mammalian Isospora.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; B L Blagburn
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1994-06

Review 9.  A review of Cystoisospora felis and C. rivolta-induced coccidiosis in cats.

Authors:  Jitender P Dubey
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Experimental infection of cats with Cystoisospora felis.

Authors:  Andrea V Scorza; Phyllis Tyrrell; Sara Wennogle; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Michael R Lappin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.175

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Experimental infection of cats with Cystoisospora felis.

Authors:  Andrea V Scorza; Phyllis Tyrrell; Sara Wennogle; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Michael R Lappin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.175

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.