Literature DB >> 26878764

Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care.

Benjamin Schooley1, Steven Walczak2, Neset Hikmet3, Nitin Patel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health information technology investments continue to increase while the value derived from their implementation and use is mixed. Mobile device adoption into practice is a recent trend that has increased dramatically and formal studies are needed to investigate consequent benefits and challenges. The objective of this study is to evaluate practitioner perceptions of improvements in productivity, provider-patient communications, care provision, technology usability and other outcomes following the adoption and use of a tablet computer connected to electronic health information resources.
METHODS: A pilot program was initiated in June 2013 to evaluate the effect of mobile tablet computers at one health provider organization in the southeast United States. Providers were asked to volunteer for the evaluation and were each given a mobile tablet computer. A total of 42 inpatient and outpatient providers were interviewed in 2015 using a survey style questionnaire that utilized yes/no, Likert-style, and open ended questions. Each had previously used an electronic health record (EHR) system a minimum of one year outside of residency, and were regular users of personal mobile devices. Each used a mobile tablet computer in the context of their practice connected to the health system EHR.
RESULTS: The survey results indicate that more than half of providers perceive the use of the tablet device as having a positive effect on patient communications, patient education, patient's perception of the provider, time spent interacting with patients, provider productivity, process of care, satisfaction with EHR when used together with the device, and care provision. Providers also reported feeling comfortable using the device (82.9%), would recommend the device to colleagues (69.2%), did not experience increased information security and privacy concerns (95%), and noted significant reductions in EHR login times (64.1%). Less than 25% of participants reported negative impacts on any of these areas as well as on time spent on order submission, note completion time, overall workload, patient satisfaction with care experience and patient outcomes. Gender, number of years in practice, practice type (general practitioner vs. specialist), and service type (inpatient/outpatient) were found to have a significant effect on perceptions of patient satisfaction, care process, and provider productivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Providers found positive gains from utilizing mobile devices in overall productivity, improved communications with their patients, the process of care, and technology efficiencies when used in combination with EHR and other health information resources. Demographic and health care work environment play a role in how mobile technologies are integrated into practice by providers.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health record; Evaluation and assessment; Health service research; Human-computer interaction; Mobile applications; Mobile computing; Mobile health; Provider productivity; Provider-patient Communications; Technology acceptanc; Usability; eHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878764     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  7 in total

1.  Implementation of a Hospital Electronic Surgical Registry in a Lower-Middle-Income Country.

Authors:  Mohini Dasari; Marcelo Garbett; Elizabeth Miller; Gustavo M Machaín; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Physicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study.

Authors:  Saif Khairat; Cameron Coleman; Paige Ottmar; Thomas Bice; Ross Koppel; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Visual Display of 5p-arm and 3p-arm miRNA Expression with a Mobile Application.

Authors:  Chao-Yu Pan; Wei-Ting Kuo; Chien-Yuan Chiu; Wen-Chang Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  An iPad application-based intervention for improving post-stroke depression symptoms in a convalescent rehabilitation ward: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Uchida; Yoshiya Hiragaki; Yuta Nishi; Shiori Nakahara; Junki Koumoto; Yusuke Onmyoji; Norimasa Fujimoto; Kazuho Kawakami; Masato Ishii; Kazuki Hirao
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2020-08-27

5.  Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students.

Authors:  Thomas J G Chase; Adam Julius; Joht Singh Chandan; Emily Powell; Charles S Hall; Benedict Lyle Phillips; Ryan Burnett; Deborah Gill; Bimbi Fernando
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Future Mobile Device Usage, Requirements, and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Oliver Maassen; Sebastian Fritsch; Julia Gantner; Saskia Deffge; Julian Kunze; Gernot Marx; Johannes Bickenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Conceição Granja; Wouter Janssen; Monika Alise Johansen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.