| Literature DB >> 33344809 |
Zhang Lei4, Qi Lingbo1, Shu Hao3, Jia Yang3, Zhang Lei4, Yang Chao1, Bai Fang5, Sun Zhiyu6.
Abstract
The development of high-efficiency and low-cost new catalysts is an extremely attractive topic. In this study, two different matrix bentonite-modified fly ash catalysts were successfully prepared, and the compressive strength of the catalyst was studied by using unsaturated dynamic and static triaxial technology. The axial compressive strength of FC (fly ash catalysts added with Ca-based bentonite) was greater than that of FN (fly ash catalysts added with Na-based bentonite). The catalyst reached 978 kPa. The prepared catalyst was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and specific surface area analysis (BET) of the catalyst. In addition, denitration performance of different catalysts was explored, and the reaction conditions were optimized. The results demonstrate that when the mixing ratio of fly ash and calcium-based bentonite in the FC is 4:1, the compressive strength is relatively high, and the denitration rate reaches about 82%.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344809 PMCID: PMC7745216 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the catalyst preparation process.
Figure 2Catalyst activity evaluation experimental process.
Content of Oxides in Fly Ash
| species | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Fe | Na2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fly ash (%) | 24.20 | 45.10 | 5.60 | 0.85 | 0.02 |
| Ca-based bentonite (%) | 15.44 | 68.10 | 0.77 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Na-based bentonite (%) | 16.43 | 68.50 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
Strength of Catalysts Made from Different Types of Bentonite
| different material catalyst | F | FC | FN |
| axial compressive strength (kPa) | 135 | 978 | 721 |
Figure 3Effect of different ratios of bentonite addition on catalyst strength.
Figure 4XRD of different types of bentonite.
Figure 5FT-IR of different dopant catalysts and fly ash.
Figure 6(a–h) Catalyst SEM of different magnifications.
Specific Surface Area of Different Catalysts
| catalyst | total pore volume of micropores (cm3/g) | single point adsorption total pore volume (cm3/g) | adsorption average pore size (nm) | specific surface area (m2/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 0.004 | 0.044 | 15.203 | 10.680 |
| FC | 0.005 | 0.045 | 12.243 | 16.996 |
| FN | 0.005 | 0.047 | 13.503 | 13.851 |
Specific Surface Area of Catalysts with Different Bentonite Addition Ratios
| bentonite addition amount | total pore volume of micropores (cm3/g) | single point adsorption total pore volume (cm3/g) | adsorption average pore size (nm) | specific surface area (m2/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3:1 | 0.004 | 0.051 | 17.347 | 16.467 |
| 4:1 | 0.004 | 0.049 | 16.820 | 14.996 |
| 5:1 | 0.005 | 0.042 | 16.338 | 12.139 |
| 6:1 | 0.004 | 0.046 | 15.740 | 11.692 |
Figure 7Denitration rates of different types of bentonite.
Figure 8Effect of different addition amount of bentonite on denitration rate.