| Literature DB >> 29925798 |
Lei Zhang3, Xin Wen2, Lei Zhang3, Xiangling Sha4, Yusu Wang5, Jihao Chen6, Min Luo7, Yonghui Li8.
Abstract
Fly ash and bentonite were mixed in a certain proporEntities:
Keywords: denitration; fly ash catalyst; plasma modification
Year: 2018 PMID: 29925798 PMCID: PMC6025079 DOI: 10.3390/ma11061047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Elemental analysis of fly ash.
| Metal Type | Sample Mass | Nitrogen Content/% | Carbon Content/% | Hydrogen Content/% | C/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | 3.726 | 0.04 | 2.191 | 0.14 | 54.37 |
| bentonite | 3.769 | 0.016 | 0.174 | 1.678 | 10.93 |
ICP analysis of fly ash.
| Metal Type | >5 ppm | 1~5 ppm | 0.5~1 ppm | 0.1~0.5 ppm | <0.1 ppm | Metal Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | K Mg | Ba Mn Sr | Cr | Cu Nb Ni | Be Cd and | 32 |
| bentonite | K Mg | none | Ba Sr Zn | Ce Cr Cu Mn | Pb Ru | 31 |
Figure 1Diagram of the experiment process. (1) Flow meter, (2) pressure relief valve, (3) high-pressure gas cylinder, (4) oxygen, (5) nitrogen, (6) nitric oxide, (7) hydrocarbon gas, (8) mixed gas cylinders, (9) plasma power supply system, (10) fume emission, (11) flue gas analyzer, and (12) plasma reactor.
Figure 2Effect of different modification gases on denitration efficiency.
Figure 3Effect of different modification times on denitration efficiency.
Figure 4Effect of different plasma power levels on denitration efficiency.
Figure 5The denitration efficiency with different modified gas flows.
Boehm titration for the catalyst with different modification times (unit: mmol/g).
| Sample | Acid Functional Groups | Basic Functional Groups | Phenolic Hydroxyl Groups | Carboxyl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 min | 3.6000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0172 |
| 20 min | 0.4500 | 2.8000 | 0.0035 | 0.0033 |
| 30 min | 3.6500 | 0.0500 | 0.0082 | 0.0075 |
| 40 min | 3.8000 | 0.0000 | 0.0107 | 0.0078 |
Figure 6The FTIR spectra with different modification times.
Boehm titration with different modified power levels (unit: Mmol/g).
| Sample | Acid Functional Groups | Basic Functional Groups | Phenolic Hydroxyl Groups | Carboxyl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 W | 0.1700 | 2.3800 | 0.0054 | 0.0076 |
| 60 W | 0.4500 | 2.8000 | 0.0035 | 0.0033 |
| 90 W | 0.1000 | 2.4500 | 0.0000 | 0.0170 |
Figure 7FTIR spectra with different plasma-modified power levels.
Boehm titration for different modification gas flows (Unit: mmol/g).
| Sample | Acid Functional Groups | Basic Functional Groups | Phenolic Hydroxyl Groups | Carboxyl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 mL/min | 4.3000 | 0.0000 | 0.0055 | 0.0072 |
| 40 mL/min | 0.4500 | 2.8000 | 0.0035 | 0.0033 |
| 60 mL/min | 4.4500 | 0.0000 | 0.0100 | 0.0087 |
Figure 8FTIR spectra with different oxygen fluxes.