| Literature DB >> 33344168 |
Mauricio Kfuri1, Igor Escalante2, Clemens Schopper2,3, Ivan Zderic2, Karl Stoffel4, Christoph Sommer5, Feras Qawasmi2,6, Matthias Knobe7, Geoff Richards2, Boyko Gueorguiev2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comminuted patellar fractures represent a challenging clinical problem. Treatment aims to restore the integrity of the extensor mechanism and the congruity of patellofemoral joint. Controversy exists regarding the ideal fixation method. Metallic constructs aiming to convert pulling forces on the anterior aspect of the patella into compression forces across the fracture site are the standard of care. More recently, low profile plates have been described in the management of comminuted patellar fractures. The aims of this study were to (1) develop a novel unstable patellar fracture model and (2) to compare biomechanically three different constructs for fixation comminuted patellar fractures. We hypothesized that an orthogonal biplanar disposition of the screws within an anteriorly placed locking plate provides the best biomechanical properties in the management of comminuted fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Biomechanics; Comminuted fracture; Mesh plate; Patella; Tension band wiring
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344168 PMCID: PMC7732873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Figure 1Cutting jig for a standardized patellar anterior wedge resection. The cutting guide was obtained by 3D printing and fits the anterior surface of the patella. It is fixed to the bone with four Kirschner wires. It has slots that allow for a reproducible 15-degree anterior wedge resection.
Figure 2Development of a comminuted patellar fracture. A: Resection of the anterior wedge and creation of a transverse fracture; B: Sagittal fracture of the superior pole; C: Sagittal and coronal fractures of the inferior pole; D: Axial view of the six main patellar fragments.
Figure 3Visualization of tension band wiring (TBW); a) photograph of an instrumented specimen; b) anteroposterior and c) lateral radiograph projections of the instrumented specimen.
Figure 4Visualization of anterolateral plating; a) photograph of an instrumented specimen; b) anteroposterior and c) lateral radiograph projections of the instrumented specimen.
Figure 5Visualization of the anterior plating; a) photograph of an instrumented specimen; b) anteroposterior and c) lateral radiograph projections of the instrumented specimen.
Figure 6Specimen preparation and set up for biomechanical testing.
Figure 7Modes of catastrophic failure after cyclic testing for the three fixation constructs a) anterior plating and b) anterolateral plating, and c) TBW.
Figure 8Interfragmentary rotation around the medio–lateral axis between the superior and inferior a) lateral and b) medial fragments in terms of mean and SD over the seven investigated time points for each fixation technique separately.
Figure 9Interfragmentary longitudinal displacement between the superior and inferior a) lateral and b) medial fragments in terms of mean and SD over the seven investigated time points for each fixation technique separately.