Tung Tran1, Melinda J Ickes2, Jakob W Hester2, Ramakanth Kavuluru3. 1. Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA. 3. Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA. Electronic address: ramakanth.kavuluru@uky.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Juul is the most popular electronic cigarette on the market. Amid concerns around uptake of e-cigarettes by never smokers, can we detect whether someone uses Juul based on their social media activities? This is the central premise of the effort reported in this paper. Several recent social media-related studies on Juul use tend to focus on the characterization of Juul-related messages on social media. In this study, we assess the potential in using machine learning methods to automatically identify Juul users (past 30-day usage) based on their Twitter data. METHODS: We obtained a collection of 588 instances, for training and testing, of Juul use patterns (along with associated Twitter handles) via survey responses of college students. With this data, we built and tested supervised machine learning models based on linear and deep learning algorithms with textual, social network (friends and followers), and other hand-crafted features. RESULTS: The linear model with textual and follower network features performed best with a precision-recall trade-off such that precision (PPV) is 57 % at 24 % recall (sensitivity). Hence, at least every other college-attending Twitter user flagged by our model is expected to be a Juul user. Additionally, our results indicate that social network features tend to have a large impact (positive) on classification performance. CONCLUSION: There are enough latent signals from social feeds for supervised modeling of Juul use, even with limited training data, implying that such models are highly beneficial to very focused intervention campaigns. This initial success indicates potential for more involved automated surveillance of Juul use based on social media data, including Juul usage patterns, nicotine dependence, and risk awareness.
INTRODUCTION: Juul is the most popular electronic cigarette on the market. Amid concerns around uptake of e-cigarettes by never smokers, can we detect whether someone uses Juul based on their social media activities? This is the central premise of the effort reported in this paper. Several recent social media-related studies on Juul use tend to focus on the characterization of Juul-related messages on social media. In this study, we assess the potential in using machine learning methods to automatically identify Juul users (past 30-day usage) based on their Twitter data. METHODS: We obtained a collection of 588 instances, for training and testing, of Juul use patterns (along with associated Twitter handles) via survey responses of college students. With this data, we built and tested supervised machine learning models based on linear and deep learning algorithms with textual, social network (friends and followers), and other hand-crafted features. RESULTS: The linear model with textual and follower network features performed best with a precision-recall trade-off such that precision (PPV) is 57 % at 24 % recall (sensitivity). Hence, at least every other college-attending Twitter user flagged by our model is expected to be a Juul user. Additionally, our results indicate that social network features tend to have a large impact (positive) on classification performance. CONCLUSION: There are enough latent signals from social feeds for supervised modeling of Juul use, even with limited training data, implying that such models are highly beneficial to very focused intervention campaigns. This initial success indicates potential for more involved automated surveillance of Juul use based on social media data, including Juul usage patterns, nicotine dependence, and risk awareness.
Authors: Jaime E Sidani; Jason B Colditz; Erica L Barrett; Ariel Shensa; Kar-Hai Chu; A Everette James; Brian A Primack Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jennifer B Unger; Robert Urman; Tess Boley Cruz; Anuja Majmundar; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Mary Ann Pentz; Rob McConnell Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-06-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Teresa W Wang; Linda J Neff; Eunice Park-Lee; Chunfeng Ren; Karen A Cullen; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 17.586