Kimberly A Fleming1,2, Roberto U Cofresí3, Bruce D Bartholow3. 1. Allegheny Health Network, Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In susceptible individuals, cues associated with drug use are theorized to take on incentive-motivational properties, including the ability to reinforce higher-order, drug-related associative learning. This study aimed to test this prediction among people varying in risk for alcohol use disorder. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Repeated-measures experiment with a measured individual difference variable at a University psychology laboratory in Missouri, USA. One hundred and six young adults (96 contributed complete data) were pre-selected to represent the upper and lower quartiles of self-reported sensitivity to alcohol's acute effects. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a second-order Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which an initially neutral visual cue (second-order conditional stimulus; CS2 ) predicted onset of an olfactory cue (first-order conditional stimulus; CS1 ). Olfactory cues were isolated from alcoholic beverages, sweets and non-comestible substances, each presumed to have a natural history of first-order conditioning. Event-related potential responses to the CS2 across its conditioning and extinction, and to the CS1 , provided neurophysiological indices of incentive salience (IS). FINDINGS: The IS of the alcohol CS1 was higher among participants low in alcohol sensitivity (LS), relative to their higher-sensitivity (HS) peers. The IS of the CS2 paired with the alcohol CS1 increased across the CS2 conditioning phase among LS but not HS participants. Also, LS (but not HS) individuals also experienced increases in alcohol craving following alcohol CS1 exposure, and this change was correlated with increases in the IS of the CS2 paired with the alcohol CS1 . CONCLUSIONS: Alcoholic beverage odor, a proximal cue for alcohol consumption, appears to reinforce conditioning of neurophysiological responses to a novel cue among low alcohol sensitivity (LS) individuals but not high alcohol sensitivity individuals, providing the first evidence that the LS phenotype may be associated with differences in the conditioned reinforcing properties of alcohol-related cues. These findings support the idea that the LS phenotype may increase alcohol use disorder risk via susceptibility to incentive salience sensitization.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In susceptible individuals, cues associated with drug use are theorized to take on incentive-motivational properties, including the ability to reinforce higher-order, drug-related associative learning. This study aimed to test this prediction among people varying in risk for alcohol use disorder. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Repeated-measures experiment with a measured individual difference variable at a University psychology laboratory in Missouri, USA. One hundred and six young adults (96 contributed complete data) were pre-selected to represent the upper and lower quartiles of self-reported sensitivity to alcohol's acute effects. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a second-order Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in which an initially neutral visual cue (second-order conditional stimulus; CS2 ) predicted onset of an olfactory cue (first-order conditional stimulus; CS1 ). Olfactory cues were isolated from alcoholic beverages, sweets and non-comestible substances, each presumed to have a natural history of first-order conditioning. Event-related potential responses to the CS2 across its conditioning and extinction, and to the CS1 , provided neurophysiological indices of incentive salience (IS). FINDINGS: The IS of the alcohol CS1 was higher among participants low in alcohol sensitivity (LS), relative to their higher-sensitivity (HS) peers. The IS of the CS2 paired with the alcohol CS1 increased across the CS2 conditioning phase among LS but not HS participants. Also, LS (but not HS) individuals also experienced increases in alcohol craving following alcohol CS1 exposure, and this change was correlated with increases in the IS of the CS2 paired with the alcohol CS1 . CONCLUSIONS: Alcoholic beverage odor, a proximal cue for alcohol consumption, appears to reinforce conditioning of neurophysiological responses to a novel cue among low alcohol sensitivity (LS) individuals but not high alcohol sensitivity individuals, providing the first evidence that the LS phenotype may be associated with differences in the conditioned reinforcing properties of alcohol-related cues. These findings support the idea that the LS phenotype may increase alcohol use disorder risk via susceptibility to incentive salience sensitization.
Authors: Kimberly A Fleming; Bruce D Bartholow; Joseph Hilgard; Denis M McCarthy; Susan E O'Neill; Douglas Steinley; Kenneth J Sher Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Lara A Ray; Kelly E Courtney; Kent E Hutchison; James Mackillop; Adriana Galvan; Dara G Ghahremani Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Casey B Kohen; Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow; Thomas M Piasecki Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Roberto U Cofresí; Casey B Kohen; Courtney A Motschman; Reinout W Wiers; Thomas M Piasecki; Bruce D Bartholow Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Roberto U Cofresí; Thomas M Piasecki; Bruce D Bartholow; Todd R Schachtman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 4.415