Literature DB >> 33338032

Ten simple rules for creating a brand-new virtual academic meeting (even amid a pandemic).

Scott Rich1, Andreea O Diaconescu2,3, John D Griffiths2,3, Milad Lankarany1,4,5.   

Abstract

The increased democratization of the creation, implementation, and attendance of academic conferences has been a serendipitous benefit of the movement toward virtual meetings. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the transition to online conferences and, in parallel, their democratization, by necessity. This manifests not just in the mitigation of barriers to attending traditional physical conferences but also in the presentation of new, and more importantly attainable, opportunities for young scientists to carve out a niche in the landscape of academic meetings. Here, we describe an early "proof of principle" of this democratizing power via our experience organizing the Canadian Computational Neuroscience Spotlight (CCNS; crowdcast.io/e/CCNS), a free 2-day virtual meeting that was built entirely amid the pandemic using only virtual tools. While our experience was unique considering the obstacles faced in creating a conference during a pandemic, this was not the only factor differentiating both our experience and the resulting meeting from other contemporary online conferences. Specifically, CCNS was crafted entirely by early career researchers (ECRs) without any sponsors or partners, advertised primarily using social media and "word of mouth," and designed specifically to highlight and engage trainees. From this experience, we have distilled "10 simple rules" as a blueprint for the design of new virtual academic meetings, especially in the absence of institutional support or partnerships, in this unprecedented environment. By highlighting the lessons learned in implementing our meeting under these arduous circumstances, we hope to encourage other young scientists to embrace this challenge, which would serve as a critical next step in further democratizing academic meetings.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33338032     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  3 in total

1.  Foundation doctors' perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons for the future.

Authors:  Prasanti A Kotta; Madhivanan Elango; Nitya Matcha; Katarina Yk Chow
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 5.410

Review 2.  The future of scientific conferences in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: Critical analysis and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Valenti; Grazia Fortuna; Caterina Barillari; Erika Cannone; Valeria Boccuni; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.707

3.  Virtual conference participant's perceptions of its effectiveness and future projections.

Authors:  Kyong-Jee Kim; Seo Rin Kim; Jangwook Lee; Ju-Young Moon; Sang-Ho Lee; Sung Joon Shin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.