Literature DB >> 33337877

Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.

Hugo Guterres1, Sang-Jun Park1, Wei Jiang2, Wonpil Im1.   

Abstract

The first important step in a structure-based virtual screening is the judicious selection of a receptor protein. In cases where the holo protein receptor structure is unavailable, significant reduction in virtual screening performance has been reported. In this work, we present a robust method to generate reliable holo protein structure conformations from apo structures using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation with restraints derived from holo structure binding-site templates. We perform benchmark tests on two different datasets: 40 structures from a directory of useful decoy-enhanced (DUD-E) and 84 structures from the Gunasekaran dataset. Our results show successful refinement of apo binding-site structures toward holo conformations in 82% of the test cases. In addition, virtual screening performance of 40 DUD-E structures is significantly improved using our MD-refined structures as receptors with an average enrichment factor (EF), an EF1% value of 6.2 compared to apo structures with 3.5. Docking of native ligands to the refined structures shows an average ligand root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 1.97 Å (DUD-E dataset and Gunasekaran dataset) relative to ligands in the holo crystal structures, which is comparable to the self-docking (i.e., docking of the native ligand back to its crystal structure receptor) average, 1.34 Å (DUD-E dataset) and 1.36 Å (Gunasekaran dataset). On the other hand, docking to the apo structures yields an average ligand RMSD of 3.65 Å (DUD-E) and 2.90 Å (Gunasekaran). These results indicate that our method is robust and can be useful to improve virtual screening performance of apo structures.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33337877      PMCID: PMC7856192          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  53 in total

1.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Structure of yeast triosephosphate isomerase at 1.9-A resolution.

Authors:  E Lolis; T Alber; R C Davenport; D Rose; F C Hartman; G A Petsko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-07-17       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Potent and selective pyrazole-based inhibitors of B-Raf kinase.

Authors:  Joshua D Hansen; Jonas Grina; Brad Newhouse; Mike Welch; George Topalov; Nicole Littman; Michele Callejo; Susan Gloor; Matthew Martinson; Ellen Laird; Barbara J Brandhuber; Guy Vigers; Tony Morales; Rich Woessner; Nikole Randolph; Joseph Lyssikatos; Alan Olivero
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  The Confine-and-Release Method: Obtaining Correct Binding Free Energies in the Presence of Protein Conformational Change.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Identification of ligand templates using local structure alignment for structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Exploring the composition of protein-ligand binding sites on a large scale.

Authors:  Nickolay A Khazanov; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  PDBspheres: a method for finding 3D similarities in local regions in proteins.

Authors:  Adam T Zemla; Jonathan E Allen; Dan Kirshner; Felice C Lightstone
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 2.  Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) Inhibitors as Anticancer Medicines: A Review on the Computer-Aided Drug Discovery Approaches over the Past Five Years.

Authors:  Ayanda M Magwenyane; Samuel C Ugbaja; Daniel G Amoako; Anou M Somboro; Rene B Khan; Hezekiel M Kumalo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 3.  Resources and computational strategies to advance small molecule SARS-CoV-2 discovery: lessons from the pandemic and preparing for future health crises.

Authors:  Natesh Singh; Bruno O Villoutreix
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.271

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.