| Literature DB >> 33335775 |
Wenbing Wang1, Yongshun Wu2, Jianpeng Yuan2, Qian Yang1, Zhiming Zhou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the gold standard for cerebral vasculature observation and is increasingly applied among the elderly population. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of a video-based education system can improve the image quality of percutaneous cerebral angiography.Entities:
Keywords: DSA; education; elderly; image quality; video
Year: 2020 PMID: 33335775 PMCID: PMC7712275 DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2020-0107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Neurosci ISSN: 2081-6936 Impact factor: 1.757
Figure 1Participant flow chart of the study.
The quality scale of DSA images
| Quality | Definition |
|---|---|
| 5 | Very good, excellent large and small vessel visualization |
| 4 | Good, excellent large vessel and minimal compromise of small vessel visualization |
| 3 | Average, diagnostic value for large vessel, but compromised small vessel visualization |
| 2 | Poor, compromised large and small vessel visualization |
| 1 | Bad, cannot be used for diagnosis |
DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Figure 2DSA image quality score with picture illustration.
Baseline characteristics of the participants
| Variables | Control ( | Intervention ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 70.65 ± 4.73 | 68.57 ± 7.80 | 0.078 |
| Male | 41 | 38 | 0.562 |
| Disease history | |||
| Stroke | 31 | 33 | 0.475 |
| Smoking | 14 | 19 | 0.227 |
| Alcohol | 7 | 10 | 0.436 |
| Diabetes | 15 | 19 | 0.318 |
| Hypertension | 46 | 40 | 0.700 |
| Hyperglycemia | 7 | 9 | 0.595 |
| Arch type | 0.311 | ||
| I | 27 | 20 | |
| II | 27 | 33 | |
| III | 11 | 7 | |
Comparison of image quality between control and intervention
| Image quality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group (control/intervention) | Left ICA | Right ICA | Left VA | Right VA | Overall (64/57) |
| Control | 3.65 ± 0.66 | 3.54 ± 0.58 | 3.26 ± 0.69 | 2.84 ± 0.78 | 3.33 ± 0.52 |
| Intervention | 4.06 ± 0.54 | 3.83 ± 0.59 | 3.60 ± 0.75 | 3.34 ± 0.70 | 3.72 ± 0.49 |
|
| <0.0001 | 0.006 | 0.012 | 0.001 | <0.0001 |
ICA, internal carotid artery; VA, vertebral artery.
Comparison of radiation and time parameters between control and intervention
| Variables | Control | Intervention |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | |||
| Operation time | 53.44 ± 22.68 | 52.74 ± 17.29 | 0.848 |
| DSA shot | 94.48 ± 32.10 | 94.02 ± 29.42 | 0.933 |
| Fluoroscopy | 656.51 ± 591.16 | 580.69 ± 333.91 | 0.375 |
| KAP | 18611.69 ± 7184.22 | 19176.75 ± 5612.53 | 0.706 |
| Radiation dose | |||
| DSA shot | 652.04 ± 214.95 | 684.22 ± 194.33 | 0.381 |
| Fluoroscopy | 131.91 ± 169.32 | 107.92 ± 71.63 | 0.299 |
| Cumulative | 783.95 ± 299.34 | 792.14 ± 241.07 | 0.866 |
DSA, digital subtraction angiography; KAP, kerma area product.