Literature DB >> 33330848

A Multiscale Deep Learning Method for Quantitative Visualization of Traumatic Hemoperitoneum at CT: Assessment of Feasibility and Comparison with Subjective Categorical Estimation.

David Dreizin1, Yuyin Zhou1, Shuhao Fu1, Yan Wang1, Guang Li1, Kathryn Champ1, Eliot Siegel1, Ze Wang1, Tina Chen1, Alan L Yuille1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a multiscale deep learning algorithm for quantitative visualization and measurement of traumatic hemoperitoneum and to compare diagnostic performance for relevant outcomes with categorical estimation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution study included 130 patients (mean age, 38 years; interquartile range, 25-50 years; 79 men) with traumatic hemoperitoneum who underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis at trauma admission between January 2016 and April 2019. Labeled cases were separated into five combinations of training (80%) and test (20%) sets, and fivefold cross-validation was performed. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were compared with those from a three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and a coarse-to-fine deep learning method. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for a composite outcome, including hemostatic intervention, transfusion, and in-hospital mortality, were compared with consensus categorical assessment by two radiologists. An optimal cutoff was derived by using a radial basis function-based support vector machine.
RESULTS: Mean DSC for the multiscale algorithm was 0.61 ± 0.15 (standard deviation) compared with 0.32 ± 0.16 for the 3D U-Net method and 0.52 ± 0.17 for the coarse-to-fine method (P < .0001). Correlation and agreement between automated and manual volumes were excellent (Pearson r = 0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The algorithm produced intuitive and explainable visual results. AUCs for automated volume measurement and categorical estimation were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively (P = .004). An optimal cutoff of 278.9 mL yielded accuracy of 84%, sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 83%.
CONCLUSION: A multiscale deep learning method for traumatic hemoperitoneum quantitative visualization had improved diagnostic performance for predicting hemorrhage-control interventions and mortality compared with subjective volume estimation. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33330848      PMCID: PMC7706875          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  33 in total

1.  A comparison of segmented abdominopelvic fluid volumes with conventional CT signs of abdominal compartment syndrome in a trauma population.

Authors:  Thomas W K Battey; David Dreizin; Uttam K Bodanapally; Amelia Wnorowski; Ghada Issa; Anthony Iacco; William Chiu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-07

Review 2.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Blunt abdominal trauma in adults: role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries. Part 1: liver and spleen.

Authors:  C D Becker; G Mentha; F Terrier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Nonoperative management for extensive hepatic and splenic injuries with significant hemoperitoneum in adults.

Authors:  Y G Goan; M S Huang; J M Lin
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-08

Review 6.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Multidetector CT for Penetrating Torso Trauma: State of the Art.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Hemoperitoneum studied by computed tomography.

Authors:  M P Federle; R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Literature review of the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and transcatheter arterial embolization for the treatment of traumatic splenic injuries.

Authors:  Cornelis H van der Vlies; Otto M van Delden; Bastiaan J Punt; Kees J Ponsen; Jim A Reekers; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Deep learning-based quantitative visualization and measurement of extraperitoneal hematoma volumes in patients with pelvic fractures: Potential role in personalized forecasting and decision support.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Yuyin Zhou; Tina Chen; Guang Li; Alan L Yuille; Ashley McLenithan; Jonathan J Morrison
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.697

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Real-world analysis of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal trauma.

Authors:  Pranav Ajmera; Amit Kharat; Rajesh Botchu; Harun Gupta; Viraj Kulkarni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-27

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal trauma and artificial intelligence: current trends and projections.

Authors:  Olga Laur; Benjamin Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  An Extra Set of Intelligent Eyes: Application of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging of Abdominopelvic Pathologies in Emergency Radiology.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Bino Varghese; Farzaneh Taravat; Liesl S Eibschutz; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

4.  Blunt splenic injury: Assessment of follow-up CT utility using quantitative volumetry.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Theresa Yu; Kaitlynn Motley; Guang Li; Jonathan J Morrison; Yuanyuan Liang
Journal:  Front Radiol       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Joo Heung Yoon; Michael R Pinsky; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 19.334

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.