| Literature DB >> 33329922 |
Vasyl Golinko1, Serhiy Cheberyachko1, Oleg Deryugin1, Olena Tretyak1, Olga Dusmatova1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The working conditions of bus drivers are difficult; they lead to occupational diseases and require careful study, particularly in Ukraine. The objective of the article is the description of occupational health risks of passenger bus drivers that lead to deteriorating health.Entities:
Keywords: Driver; Harmful work-related factor; Occupational disease; Passenger bus; Risk
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329922 PMCID: PMC7728822 DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.07.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saf Health Work ISSN: 2093-7911
Fig. 1The risk of the occupational disease manifestation for a passenger bus driver due to the effect of the harmful factors [2].
Fig. 2The table to assess the risks of the occupational diseases in accordance with the method of BS8800 Standard, Risk score.
The effect of the harmful work-related factors upon a human and the determination of the corresponding points for their harm severity
| No. | Harmful work-related factor | Consequences of the effect upon the human organism | Determined value of the harmful work-related factor | Corresponding points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Noise | Deteriorates the sense of hearing, results in the loss of hearing, causes stress, increases blood pressure, may result in the hypertonic disease | 78–82 dB | 3 |
| 2. | Vibration | Results in the vibration disease, disorders in the cardiovascular system and the musculoskeletal system | 75–85 dB | 3 |
| 3. | Harmful substances (СО) | Results in the acute intoxication due to the oxygen blocking with the following hypoxia; damages the oxidizing reactions resulting in the biochemical unbalance in tissues | 7–18 mg/m3 | 3 |
| 4. | Temperature | Results in the disturbed thermal regulation, fluid-and-electrolyte imbalance, organism overheating, oxygen deprivation, headaches, tachycardia | 2–30°С | 4 |
| 5. | Nervous tension | Drowsiness, weakness, indifference, signs of depressed state, nervous breakdown | 80% | 4 |
The formulas for determining scores to assess the likelihood of disease [26]
| Harmful work-related factor, reference | Unit of measurement | Computational psychophysiological formula | Value of psychophysiological factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise, | Hz | 0.3 | |
| Vibrations, | dB | 0.77 | |
| Harmful substances (СО), | mg/m3 | 0.55 | |
| Temperature, | °С | 1.6 | |
| Nervous tension, | % | 1.57 |
Note: x0 – corresponds to BAC for different harmful work-related factors; it is taken as a minimal value in points.
The calculation results of the probable effect of the harmful work-related factors
| Harmful work-related factor | Bus type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| “MB sprinter” | “RUTA” | “BOHDAN” | |
| Noise | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Vibration | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Harmful substances | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Temperature | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Nervous tension | 5 | 5 | 5 |
The calculation results of the occupational disease risks in the drivers caused by the action of different harmful substances
| Harmful work-related factor | Bus type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| “MB sprinter” | “RUTA” | “BOHDAN” | |
| Noise | 9 (medium) | 9 (medium) | 9 (medium) |
| Vibration | 15 (high) | 18 (high) | 18 (high) |
| Harmful substances | 9 (medium) | 9 (medium) | 15 (high) |
| Temperature | 12 (high) | 16 (high) | 16 (high) |
| Nervous tension | 20 (high) | 20 (high) | 20 (high) |
The calculation results of the safety level in the driver's working environment
| Harmful work-related factor | Safety level of the working environment of a bus driver | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| “MB sprinter” | “RUTA” | “BOHDAN” | |
| Noise | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.60 |
| Vibration | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.20 |
| Harmful substances | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.36 |
| Temperature | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.53 |
| Nervous tension | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
The calculation results of the generalized risk level within the driver's working environment
| Calculation results | Type of the harmful factors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | Vibration | Harmful substances | Temperature | Nervous tension | |
| Generalized safety level, | 0.261 | 0.009 | 0.172 | 0.187 | 0.068 |
| Generalized risk level, | 0.739 | 0.991 | 0.828 | 0.813 | 0.932 |
| Maximum admissible level of the generalized risk depending upon the work experience, | 0.830 | 0.830 | 1.000 | 0.680 | 0.750 |
| Deviation of the actual level of occupational risk from the maximum admissible one, % | 11 | 22 | 17 | 20 | 24 |