| Literature DB >> 33329580 |
Clement Triaille1,2, Louise Vansteenkiste1, Manuel Constant3, Jérôme Ambroise4, Laurent Méric de Bellefon5, Adrien Nzeusseu Toukap5, Tatiana Sokolova1, Christine Galant6, Pierre Coulie7, Javier Carrasco3, Patrick Durez1,5, Bernard R Lauwerys1,5.
Abstract
Objectives: We explored histological and transcriptomic profiles of paired synovial biopsies from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, in order to assess homogeneity in synovial tissue at the individual level.Entities:
Keywords: T lymphocytes; TCR repertoire; gene expression; rheumatoid arthritis; synovial biopsy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329580 PMCID: PMC7719799 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.593083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the RA patients (n = 10) included in the study.
| Age (mean ± SEM) | 51.7 ± 4.4 years |
| Disease duration (years) (mean ± SEM) | 12.1 ± 3.6 years |
| Female | 10/10 |
| ACPA/RF positivity | 8/10 |
| Erosive disease | 10/10 |
| Ongoing treatment | |
| cDMARDS | 4/10 |
| bDMARDS | 4/10 |
| Prednisolone (<7.5mg/d) | 4/10 |
| No DMARDS | 2/10 |
| DAS28CRP (mean ± SEM) | 5.07 ± 0.28 |
| VAS physician (mean ± SEM) | 5.07 ± 0.41 |
| CDAI (mean ± SEM) | 27.48 ± 2.4 |
| SDAI mean ± SEM) | 29.79 ± 2.7 |
| CRP (mg/l) (mean ± SEM) | 23.44 ± 7.54 |
| HAQ (mean ± SEM) | 1.73 ± 0.24 |
ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; bDMARDS, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; CDAI, clinical Disease Activity Index; cDMARDS, classical disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS28CRP, disease activity score-28 for rheumatoid arthritis with CRP; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, simplified Disease Activity Index; VAS, visual analog scale.
Comparison of semi-quantitative evaluations of histological and immunohistochemistry scores in paired synovial biopsy sections obtained from small versus large joints of 10 RA patients.
| Median score in small joints (interquartile range) | Median score in large joints (interquartile range) | Spearman | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synovial hyperplasia | 1 (1–2) | 2 (0.75–2) | 0.7473 | 0.0174 |
| Inflammatory infiltrates | 2 (1–2) | 2 (0–2) | 0.6158 | 0.0478 |
| Hypervascularity | 1 (1–2) | 2 (1–3) | 0.2888 | 0.4069 |
| Fibrinoid necrosis | 0 (0–1) | 1 (0–2) | −0.276 | 0.4023 |
| CD3+ cells | 1.5 (1–1.5) | 1.5 (0.5–2) | 0.7936 | 0.0047 |
| CD20+ cells | 0.5 (0–1) | 0 (0,1–5) | 0.2308 | 0.4854 |
| CD68+ cells | 1 (1–2) | 2 (0.5–2) | 0.5884 | 0.0609 |
Figure 1Similar cellular and global molecular characteristics in small versus large joints from the same RA patients. (A) Representative pairs of biopsy sections obtained from small versus large RA joints from the same patient, showing similar grades of synovial hyperplasia and CD3+ T cell infiltration. (B) Transcripts overexpressed in small, large or all (small and large) RA joints display similar patterns of differential expression in small versus large RA compared to OA joints. Each dot represents the difference in log2-transformed gene expression values in small RA (X axis) or large RA (Y axis) minus OA joints. Transcripts encoding HOXD10 and HOXD11 are shown as large red dots in the first panel. Pearson r correlation coefficients and p values are displayed on the graph.
Figure 2Similar expression patterns of RA-specific molecular pathways in small versus large joints from the same RA patients. (A) Distribution in small versus large RA joints of gene scores calculated for the following pathways: TCR signaling, Response to TNF and T Cell co-stimulation. Pearson r correlation coefficients and p values are displayed on the graph. (B) Expression of TCR Signaling-related transcripts in paired small versus large RA joints compared to OA controls. Data are displayed as mean-centered log2-transformed expression values according to the color scale shown on the figure. The list of transcripts is available in . PLCγ2 (indicated by an arrow) is differentially expressed between small and large joints using paired t-tests. (C) Distribution of Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients calculated for all transcripts involved in the following pathways TCR signaling, Response to TNF and T Cell co-stimulation, in real compared to random pairs of joints. Data are displayed as median values and interquartile ranges.
Figure 3Enriched synovial TCRB sequences are shared more frequently between pairs of synovial biopsies with high compared to low T cell signatures. (A) Representative synovial biopsy sections illustrating differences in T cell disposition between low (left panel) versus high (right panel) T cell infiltration. CD3-positive cells are stained in brown. (B) Correlation coefficients between levels of expression of T cell-related transcripts and transcripts associated with germinal centers in synovial biopsies with a low (left panel) versus high (right panel) T cell infiltration. Pearson r correlation coefficients are displayed according to a color scale shown in the figure. (C) Enriched T cell Clonotypes are shared more frequently in T cell-rich compared to T cell-low synovial biopsy pairs. Two examples are displayed showing the distribution of TCRB sequences in a pair of T cell-low (left panel) and T cell high (right) panel synovial biopsies. The grey lines are the limit of detection. ETC (i.e. TCRB sequences 100x more frequent in a large or small synovial biopsy specimen compared to blood) are depicted as large gray circles. (D) Correlation between TCR signaling gene score (mean value of paired samples) and fraction of ETC shared between pairs of synovial samples. Blue dots indicate low while red dots indicate high TCR signaling scores.