| Literature DB >> 33329503 |
Jiri Kucera1, Jan Lochman1, Pavel Bouchal1, Eva Pakostova2, Kamil Mikulasek3, Sabrina Hedrich4, Oldrich Janiczek1, Martin Mandl1, D Barrie Johnson2.
Abstract
Hydrogen can serve as an electron donor for chemolithotrophic acidophiles, especially in the deep terrestrial subsurface and geothermal ecosystems. Nevertheless, the current knowledge of hydrogen utilization by mesophilic acidophiles is minimal. A multi-omics analysis was applied on Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans growing on hydrogen, and a respiratory model was proposed. In the model, [NiFe] hydrogenases oxidize hydrogen to two protons and two electrons. The electrons are used to reduce membrane-soluble ubiquinone to ubiquinol. Genetically associated iron-sulfur proteins mediate electron relay from the hydrogenases to the ubiquinone pool. Under aerobic conditions, reduced ubiquinol transfers electrons to either cytochrome aa 3 oxidase via cytochrome bc 1 complex and cytochrome c 4 or the alternate directly to cytochrome bd oxidase, resulting in proton efflux and reduction of oxygen. Under anaerobic conditions, reduced ubiquinol transfers electrons to outer membrane cytochrome c (ferrireductase) via cytochrome bc 1 complex and a cascade of electron transporters (cytochrome c 4, cytochrome c 552, rusticyanin, and high potential iron-sulfur protein), resulting in proton efflux and reduction of ferric iron. The proton gradient generated by hydrogen oxidation maintains the membrane potential and allows the generation of ATP and NADH. These results further clarify the role of extremophiles in biogeochemical processes and their impact on the composition of the deep terrestrial subsurface.Entities:
Keywords: Acidithiobacillus; extremophiles; ferric iron reduction; hydrogen metabolism; multi-omics; oxygen reduction
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329503 PMCID: PMC7735108 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.610836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Multi-omics analysis of aerobically and anaerobically grown At. ferrooxidans cells with hydrogen as an electron donor. Experimental design including cultivation, next-generation sequencing, quantitative proteomics, and bioinformatic data analysis (A). Volcano plot representing all expressed genes (B). Volcano plot representing all identified proteins (C). Closed circles indicate gene transcripts and proteins that changed significantly (q < 0.05); colored circles indicate significant fold change (|log2 fc| > 1 for gene transcripts, and 0.58 for proteins, respectively). Venn diagram displays significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and proteins (DEPs) values (q < 0.05) with |log2 fc| > 1 for gene transcripts, and 0.58 for proteins, respectively (D).
FIGURE 2The heat map of products of energy metabolism-related gene clusters that were differentially expressed in aerobically and anaerobically grown At. ferrooxidans cells with hydrogen as an electron donor. Shown are only genes and proteins that changed significantly (q < 0.05) with absolute log2 fold change > 1 for gene transcripts and 0.58 for proteins.
FIGURE 3Relative abundances of energy metabolism proteins in aerobically and anaerobically grown At. ferrooxidans cells with hydrogen as an electron donor. Blue bars represent aerobic growth (electron acceptor: oxygen), and red bars represent anaerobic growth (electron acceptor: ferric iron). An asterisk indicates a significant change between the aerobic and anaerobic growth (|log2 fold change| > 0.58 and q < 0.05). Error bars are standard deviations of triplicate analyses.
FIGURE 4Model of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism of hydrogen connected with carbon dioxide assimilation in At. ferrooxidans. Solid green arrows indicate direct electron transfer, solid orange arrows indicate reverse electron transfer, and solid gray arrows indicate enzymatic reactions during the aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Solid blue arrows indicate direct electron transfer during aerobic metabolism, while solid red arrows indicate direct electron transfer during anaerobic metabolism. The thickness of the colored arrows corresponds to the pathway significance according to the relative protein abundance in Figure 3. Dotted gray arrows indicate proton transfer, dotted green arrows indicate hydrogen influx, and dotted orange arrows indicate carbon dioxide influx. The color of proteins and multiprotein complexes corresponds to the log2 fold changes in Figure 2. The redox potential values (EH) for individual proteins and multiprotein complexes are referenced in the text. 2-PG, 2-phosphoglycolate; 3-PGA, 3-phosphoglycerate; 1,3-BPG, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; SBP, sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose 7-phosphate; E4P, erythrose 4-phosphate; FBP, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; R5P, ribose 5-phosphate; X5P, xylulose 5-phosphate; Ru5P, ribulose 5-phosphate; RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; PEP, 2-phosphoenolpyruvate; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.