| Literature DB >> 33329477 |
Guizhen Wang1,2,3, Yawen Gao1,3, Xiuhua Wu2, Xiue Gao2, Min Zhang2, Hongmei Liu1, Tianqi Fang1,3.
Abstract
Suilysin (SLY) plays a critical role in Streptococcus suis infections making it an ideal target to the combat infection caused by this pathogen. In the present study, we found that piceatannol (PN), a natural compound, inhibits pore-formation by blocking the oligomerization of SLY without affecting the growth of S. suis and the expression of SLY. Furthermore, PN alleviated the J774 cell damage and the expression of the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1α (IL-1β) induced by S. suis in vitro. The computational biology and biochemistry results indicated that PN binds to the joint region of D2 and D4 in SLY, and Asn57, Pro58, Pro59, Glu76, Ile379, Glu380, and Glu418 were critical residues involved in the binding. The binding effect between PN and SLY hindered the SLY monomers from forming the oligomers, thereby weakening the hemolytic activity of SLY. This mechanism was also verified by hemolysis analysis and analysis of KA formation after site-specific mutagenesis. Furthermore, PN protected mice from S. suis infections by reducing bacterial colony formation and the inflammatory response in target organs in vivo. These results indicate that PN is a feasible drug candidate to combat S. suis infections.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus suis; molecular modeling; piceatannol; suilysin; virulence
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329477 PMCID: PMC7728846 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.593588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1The inhibitory effects of piceatannol (PN) on suilysin (SLY) or the culture supernatant of Streptococcus suis. (A) The chemical structure of PN. (B) The inhibitory effect of PN on bacterial culture supernatants after coculture with SS2. PC represents positive control, NC represents negative control. (C) The growth of SS2 in the presence of the indicated PN concentrations. (D) The SLY expression level. (E) The inhibitory effect of PN on SLY-induced hemolysis. (F) The formation of SLY oligomers after treatment with different concentrations of PN. (G) The relative ratio of oligomers and monomers of the total protein in the oligomerization assays. All data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3), *indicates p < 0.05, **indicates p < 0.01. An unpaired two-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Primers used in site-specific mutagenesis study.
| Name | Oligonucleotide (5'-3')* |
|---|---|
| SLY-E76A-F | GTACTTCGCAGA |
| SLY-E76A-R | GTAATATTCTTCTT |
| SLY-P58A-F | GAATACATTGATAAT |
| SLY-P58A-R | CAGTTGTTGCTGG |
The underlined basic group represents mutated codons.
Figure 2PN protected cells from injury and inflammation induced by S. suis. (A) The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release from cells treated with S. suis or SLY. (B) along with different concentrations of PN. (C) The levels of TNF-α and IL-1β (D) in the infected cells treated with or without PN. All data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3), ** indicates p < 0.01. An unpaired two-tailed t- test was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Figure 3The equilibrium of the PN-SLY complex system. (A,C) The binding mode of SLY with PN from molecular dynamics (MD) simulation (B) The details of residues that play roles during the binding process. (D) The root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) values of the SLY-PN complex during MD simulation.
Figure 4The flexibility of amino acids changed and hydrogen bonds existed in the binding. (A) The flexibility of amino acids in the free protein and the PN-SLY complex system. (B) The formation of hydrogen bonds during binding. (C) The exact details of hydrogen bonds formed between residues in PN and (D) the g(r) value of the acceptor and donor.
The details of hydrogen bonds between PN and SLY.
| Pr. | Acceptor | Donor | Proportion% | Distance(Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLY | Ligand:O3 | Pro58Main O | 79.71 | 2.72 |
Figure 5The free energy contribution of residues, and the changes in the pore-forming inhibitory effect and the K of PN against SLY mutants. (A) The free energy contributions of residues during the binding process of PN and SLY. (B) The distance between PN and residues in SLY. (C) The inhibitory effect of PN against pore-formation by SLY or its mutant. (D) The fitted lines between PN and SLY or its mutants.
Figure 6Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the simulation trajectory (A) Principal components in free SLY. (B) Principal components in the PN-SLY complex. The lengths of the cones represent the magnitude of the motion.
Figure 7PN protects mice from S. suis infection by decreasing inflammation and colony formation. (A) S. suis colonization in the liver and spleen (B). (C) Expression levels of TNF-α and IL-1β (D) in the liver and spleen. Data are shown as the mean ± SD, **indicates p < 0.01. An unpaired two-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis.