| Literature DB >> 33329470 |
Lulu Geng1, Wenjun Huang1, Susu Jiang1, Yanwei Zheng1, Yibei Zhou1, Yang Zhou1, Jiangshan Hu1, Ping Li1, Minfang Tao1.
Abstract
Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a chronic and progressive condition with a series of vulvovaginal, sexual, and lower urinary tract discomforts, mainly due to hypoestrogenism. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has generally been considered as the most effective treatment for GSM. In addition, vaginal microbiota is of particular significance to gynecological and reproductive illnesses and potentially has some intimate connections with GSM. Consequently, we sought to evaluate how MHT impacts the composition and structure of vaginal microbiota while alleviating GSM in Chinese menopausal women aged 45-65 years, which has not been investigated previously. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to analyze microbial diversity and composition using vaginal swabs obtained from 100 menopausal women, classified as MHT women who have been taking tibolone regularly (n = 50) and non-treated women who never received any treatment (n = 50). Vaginal Health Index Score (VHIS) and GSM symptoms inquiry were also performed. We found that the vaginal microbial diversity decreased and that the abundance of Lactobacillus increased to be the dominant proportion significantly in the MHT group, in considerable contrast to vaginal microbiota of the non-treated group, which significantly comprised several anaerobic bacteria, namely, Gardnerella, Prevotella, Escherichia-Shigella, Streptococcus, Atopobium, Aerococcus, Anaerotruncus, and Anaerococcus. In this study, women without any MHT had significantly more severe GSM symptoms than those receiving tibolone, especially with regard to vulvovaginal dryness and burning, as well as decreased libido (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the severity of urological symptoms between the groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, Lactobacillus was demonstrated to be associated with VHIS positively (r = 0.626, P < 0.001) and with GSM negatively (r = -0.347, P < 0.001). We also identified Chlamydia (r = 0.277, P < 0.01) and Streptococcus (r = 0.270, P < 0.01) as having a prominent association with more serious GSM symptoms. Our study provided an elucidation that MHT could notably alleviate GSM and conspicuously reshape the composition of the vaginal microbiota, which is of extreme importance to clinical practice for the management of GSM.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; genitourinary syndrome of menopause; menopausal hormone therapy; menopause; tibolone; vaginal microbiota
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329470 PMCID: PMC7718012 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.590877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Demographic characteristics of participants.
| Demographics | Non-treated group | MHT group | ||
| Age (y, mean ± SD) | 53.34 ± 3.33 | 54.76 ± 4.27 | 0.067 | |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 22.50 ± 3.54 | 21.85 ± 2.50 | 0.291 | |
| E2 [pg/mL, median (Q1–Q3)] | 26.5 (17.00–33.25) | 28.5 (17.75–37.75) | 0.909 | |
| FSH [mIU/mL, median (Q1–Q3)] | 68.16 (51.29–80.08) | 59.14 (47.52–68.29) | 0.107 | |
| No. of parity ( | ≤ 1 | 43 (86.0%) | 43 (86.0%) | 1.000 |
| ≥ 2 | 7 (14.0%) | 7 (14.0%) | ||
| No. of abortion ( | ≤ 1 | 29 (58.0%) | 31 (62.0%) | 0.683 |
| ≥ 2 | 21 (42.0%) | 19 (38.0%) | ||
| Occupational status ( | In work | 23 (46.0%) | 21 (42.0%) | 0.687 |
| Retired/unemployed | 27 (54.0%) | 29 (58.0%) | ||
| Educational length (y, | ≤ 6 | 2 (4.0%) | 1 (2.0%) | 0.638 |
| 6–9 | 9 (18.0%) | 12 (24.0%) | ||
| 9–12 | 19 (38.0%) | 22 (44.0%) | ||
| > 12 | 20 (40.0%) | 15 (30.0%) | ||
| Economic state (monthly income, yuan, | ≤ 3,000 | 17 (34.0%) | 21 (42.0%) | 0.533 |
| 3,000–5,000 | 15 (30.0%) | 16 (32.0%) | ||
| > 5,000 | 18 (36.0%) | 13 (26.0%) | ||
Common symptoms of GSM.
| Common symptoms | Non-treated group ( | MHT group ( | |||||||||||
| Asymptomatic | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Extremely severe | Mean ± SD (Mean) | Asymptomatic | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Extremely severe | Mean ± SD (Mean) | ||
| Vulvovaginal symptom | 2.32 ± 0.36 (2) | 1.06 ± 0.18 (1) | |||||||||||
| Dryness | 30.00% | 36.00% | 20.00% | 10.00% | 4.00% | 1.22 ± 0.16 (1) | 58.00% | 26.00% | 16.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58 ± 0.11 (0) | |
| Itching | 62.00% | 20.00% | 6.00% | 12.00% | 0.00% | 0.68 ± 0.15 (0) | 68.00% | 22.00% | 10.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42 ± 0.10 (0) | 0.366 |
| Burning | 78.00% | 10.00% | 4.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 0.42 ± 0.13 (0) | 96.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06 ± 0.04 (0) | |
| Urological symptom | 0.94 ± 0.19 (0) | 0.52 ± 0.16 (0) | 0.051 | ||||||||||
| Frequent, urgent, and painful urination | 70.00% | 18.00% | 10.00% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.44 ± 0.11 (0) | 84.00% | 14.00% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18 ± 0.06 (0) | 0.072 |
| Recurrent urinary tract infection | 90.00% | 2.00% | 8.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18 ± 0.08 (0) | 96.00% | 0.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08 ± 0.06 (0) | 0.436 |
| Incontinence | 74.00% | 20.00% | 6.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32 ± 0.08 (0) | 84.00% | 10.00% | 2.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.26 ± 0.10 (0) | 0.305 |
| Sexual symptom | 2.58 ± 0.17 (3) | 1.62 ± 0.20 (1) | |||||||||||
| Decreased libido | 8.00% | 8.00% | 32.00% | 22.00% | 30.00% | 2.58 ± 0.17 (3) | 77.80% | 24.00% | 20.00% | 14.00% | 14.00% | 1.62 ± 0.20 (1) | |
| GSM | 5.84 ± 0.49 (5) | 3.20 ± 0.41 (2.5) | |||||||||||
FIGURE 1Severity of GSM main symptoms in each group: non-treated vs. MHT. Higher score means more severe symptom; statistical differences are shown in this figure: ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.005.
Alpha diversity indices for vaginal microbiota.
| Alpha diversity indices | Non-treated group ( | MHT group ( | |||||
| Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 | ||
| Shannon | 0.99 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.52 | |
| Simpson | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.00 | |
| Ace | 51.53 | 24.43 | 111.52 | 30.58 | 12.54 | 63.07 | |
| Chao | 35.13 | 21.75 | 107.00 | 22.10 | 10.75 | 30.44 | |
| Coverage | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.109 |
FIGURE 2Comparing samples distributions belonging to the non-treated (red) or MHT (blue) group by using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Each sample is shown as a dot.
FIGURE 3Heatmap analysis of relative abundance of microbial taxa found in all vaginal samples at the genus level (top 50). Each sample is shown as vertical bar, and different color of each cell represents different relative abundance: the low abundance and high abundance are highlighted by green and red, respectively. The horizontal bar on the top indicates the non-treated (red) or MHT (blue) group; dendrograms reflect hierarchical clustering on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (columns) or Euclidean distance (rows) using average linkage.
Proportion of most abundant genera in vaginal microbiota of different groups.
| Genus | Abundance proportion in non-treated group | Abundance proportion in MHT group | ||||
| Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | |
| 29.1% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 83.1% | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 22.7% | 99.9% | 0.0% | 6.4% | 55.5% | 0.0% | |
| 7.4% | 63.5% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 31.4% | 0.0% | |
| 5.8% | 97.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 21.4% | 0.0% | |
| 5.1% | 81.4% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 9.2% | 0.0% | |
| 4.4% | 37.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | 46.0% | 0.0% | |
| 3.1% | 92.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 6.6% | 0.0% | |
| 2.1% | 54.1% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 52.0% | 0.0% | |
| 1.8% | 38.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.9% | 0.0% | |
| 1.5% | 22.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.3% | 0.0% | |
| 1.3% | 15.1% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 23.6% | 0.0% | |
| 1.2% | 58.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 1.1% | 56.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | |
| 0.8% | 11.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | |
| 0.7% | 13.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 7.5% | 0.0% | |
| 0.6% | 15.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 17.6% | 0.0% | |
| 0.6% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | |
| 0.6% | 12.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | 5.4% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 11.6% | 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | 18.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 4.5% | 0.0% | |
| 0.2% | 9.8% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 46.4% | 0.0% | |
| Others | 8.7% | 72.9% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 30.3% | 0.0% |
FIGURE 4Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis for comparing microbial variations at the genus level between the non-treated (red) and MHT (blue) group. (A) LEfSE cladogram of microbial taxa in different group (P < 0.05). (B) LDA score identifying effect size of difference between groups with a threshold value of 3.5, a higher score represents a greater contribution to the observed intergroup difference, indicating this taxon is a more important biomarker.
FIGURE 5Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) of the above vaginal microbiota and clinical characteristics. Red and blue points represent non-treated and MHT samples, respectively, the 95% confidence intervals of samples’ distribution are visualized by ellipses, and the top 20 microbial genera are colored with yellow. Clinical characteristic variables (age, BMI, VHIS, GSM) are indicated by vectors in black.