Amy Elliott1, Nick Taub2, Jay Banerjee1, Faisal Aijaz1, Will Jones1, Lucy Teece2, James van Oppen1, Simon Conroy3. 1. Department of Emergency & Specialist Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK. 2. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK. 3. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK. Electronic address: spc3@leicester.ac.uk.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine whether the Clinical Frailty Scale applied at emergency department (ED) triage is associated with important service- and patient-related outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a single-center, retrospective cohort study examining hospital-related outcomes and their associations with frailty scores assessed at ED triage. Participants were aged 65 years or older, registered on their first ED presentation during the study period at a single, centralized ED in the United Kingdom. Baseline data included age, sex, Clinical Frailty Scale score, National Early Warning Score-2 and the Charlson Comorbidity Index score; outcomes included length of stay, readmissions (any future admissions), and mortality (inhospital or out of hospital) up to 2 years after ED presentation. Survival analysis methods (standard and competing risks) were applied to assess associations between ED triage frailty scores and outcomes. Unadjusted incidence curves and adjusted hazard ratios are presented. RESULTS: A total of 52,562 individuals representing 138,328 ED attendances were included; participants' mean age was 78.0 years, and 55% were women. Initial admission rates generally increased with frailty. Mean length of stay after 30- or 180-day follow-up was relatively low; all Clinical Frailty Scale categories included patients who experienced zero days' length of stay (ie, ambulatory care) and patients with relatively high numbers of inhospital days. Overall, 46% of study participants were readmitted by the 2-year follow-up. Readmissions increased with Clinical Frailty Scale score up until a score of 6 and then attenuated. Mortality rates increased with increasing frailty; the adjusted hazard ratio was 3.6 for Clinical Frailty Scale score 7 to 8 compared with score 1 to 3. CONCLUSION: Frailty assessed at ED triage (with the Clinical Frailty Scale) is associated with adverse outcomes in older people. Its use in ED triage might aid immediate clinical decisionmaking and service configuration.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine whether the Clinical Frailty Scale applied at emergency department (ED) triage is associated with important service- and patient-related outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a single-center, retrospective cohort study examining hospital-related outcomes and their associations with frailty scores assessed at ED triage. Participants were aged 65 years or older, registered on their first ED presentation during the study period at a single, centralized ED in the United Kingdom. Baseline data included age, sex, Clinical Frailty Scale score, National Early Warning Score-2 and the Charlson Comorbidity Index score; outcomes included length of stay, readmissions (any future admissions), and mortality (inhospital or out of hospital) up to 2 years after ED presentation. Survival analysis methods (standard and competing risks) were applied to assess associations between ED triage frailty scores and outcomes. Unadjusted incidence curves and adjusted hazard ratios are presented. RESULTS: A total of 52,562 individuals representing 138,328 ED attendances were included; participants' mean age was 78.0 years, and 55% were women. Initial admission rates generally increased with frailty. Mean length of stay after 30- or 180-day follow-up was relatively low; all Clinical Frailty Scale categories included patients who experienced zero days' length of stay (ie, ambulatory care) and patients with relatively high numbers of inhospital days. Overall, 46% of study participants were readmitted by the 2-year follow-up. Readmissions increased with Clinical Frailty Scale score up until a score of 6 and then attenuated. Mortality rates increased with increasing frailty; the adjusted hazard ratio was 3.6 for Clinical Frailty Scale score 7 to 8 compared with score 1 to 3. CONCLUSION: Frailty assessed at ED triage (with the Clinical Frailty Scale) is associated with adverse outcomes in older people. Its use in ED triage might aid immediate clinical decisionmaking and service configuration.
Authors: James David van Oppen; Timothy John Coats; Simon Paul Conroy; Jagruti Lalseta; Kay Phelps; Emma Regen; Peter Riley; Jose Maria Valderas; Nicola Mackintosh Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Noemi R Simon; Andrea S Jauslin; Marco Rueegg; Raphael Twerenbold; Maurin Lampart; Stefan Osswald; Stefano Bassetti; Sarah Tschudin-Sutter; Martin Siegemund; Christian H Nickel; Roland Bingisser Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Jai N Darvall; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; Paul J Young; Kenneth Rockwood; David Pilcher Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Thomas Gilbert; Quentin Cordier; Stéphanie Polazzi; Marc Bonnefoy; Eilìs Keeble; Andrew Street; Simon Conroy; Antoine Duclos Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 10.668