| Literature DB >> 33327266 |
Xiu-Xiu Li1, Shi-Hui Liu, Su-Jing Zhuang, Shi-Feng Guo, Shou-Liang Pang.
Abstract
Our study aimed to investigate the effect of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase and edaravone on cerebral hemodynamics and T lymphocyte level in patients harboring acute cerebral infarction.There involved a total of 118 patients with acute cerebral infarction from November 2017 to May 2019 in our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups: the observation group (59 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase combined with edaravone) and the control group (59 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis of alteplase). The clinical effect, neurological function, cerebral hemodynamic index, T lymphocyte level, oxygen free radical scavenging level and oxidative stress index of the 2 groups were observed and compared.Before the treatment, there were no significant differences in neurological function, cerebral hemodynamic indexes, T-lymphocyte level, oxygen free radical scavenging level and oxidative stress indexes between the 2 groups (P > .05). After the treatment, the neurological function, cerebral hemodynamic indexes, T-lymphocyte level, oxygen free radical scavenging level and oxidative stress indexes of the 2 groups were significantly improved. In addition, the observation group exerted greater beneficial effect in terms of the clinical effect, neurologic function, cerebral hemodynamic index, T lymphocyte level, oxygen free radical scavenging level and oxidative stress index than those of the control group (P < .05).The intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase and edaravone is effective in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction, which also provides better results in terms of improving the clinical efficacy and prognosis of patients and might be an alternative option for clinical practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33327266 PMCID: PMC7738115 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the 2 groups (%, n).
| Group | Ineffective | Effective | Significantly effective | Cured | Cure rate |
| Observation group (n = 59) | 2 (7.25) | 17 (28.81) | 21 (35.59) | 19 (32.20) | 57 (96.61)b |
| Control group (n = 59) | 9 (15.25) | 22 (37.29) | 18 (30.51) | 10 (16.95) | 50 (84.75) |
Compared with the control group; (bP < .05).
Comparison of NIHSS scores between the 2 groups ().
| Group | Before treatment | After treatment |
| Observation group (n = 59) | 14.82 ± 1.46 | 7.08 ± 1.01ab |
| Control group (n = 59) | 14.91 ± 1.35 | 10.72 ± 1.42b |
Before treatment, compared with the same group (aP < .05); after treatment, compared with the control group (bP < .05).
Comparison of cerebral hemodynamic indexes between the 2 groups ().
| Group | Time | Qmean (cm3/s) | Vmean (cm/s) | Peripheral resistance level (KPa·s)/m | Characteristic impedance (KPa·s)/m |
| Observation group (n = 59) | Before treatment | 6.86 ± 1.23 | 12.58 ± 1.97 | 95.81 ± 3.08 | 16.51 ± 3.08 |
| After treatment | 9.89 ± 2.07ab | 18.73 ± 2.63ab | 94.83 ± 4.16ab | 12.11 ± 3.78ab | |
| Control group (n = 59) | Before treatment | 6.91 ± 1.17 | 12.72 ± 2.04 | 74.21 ± 3.93 | 16.47 ± 2.78 |
| After treatment | 7.32 ± 1.22b | 15.26 ± 2.43b | 79.08 ± 4.73b | 14.83 ± 3.72b |
Before treatment, compared with the same group (aP < .05); after treatment, compared with the control group (bP < .05).
Comparison of T lymphocyte levels between the 2 groups ().
| Group | Time | CD4+ (%) | CD8+ (%) | CD4+/CD8+ |
| Observation group (n = 59) | Before treatment | 36.65 ± 2.71 | 23.58 ± 2.97 | 2.05 ± 0.38 |
| After treatment | 40.89 ± 4.09ab | 22.73 ± 3.03ab | 2.31 ± 0.16ab | |
| Control group (n = 59) | Before treatment | 35.91 ± 1.17 | 24.02 ± 2.12 | 1.98 ± 0.41 |
| After treatment | 37.32 ± 1.22b | 23.65 ± 3.32b | 2.16 ± 0.28b |
Before treatment, compared with the same group (aP < .05); after treatment, compared with the control group (bP < .05).
Comparison of oxygen free radical levels and oxidative stress indexes between the 2 groups ().
| Observation group (n = 59) | Control group (n = 59) | |||
| Group | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment |
| Oxygen free radical levels | ||||
| PLO (%) | 50.81 ± 3.47 | 5.32 ± 0.47ab | 49.89 ± 4.08 | 15.32 ± 2.08b |
| NO (%) | 38.98 ± 3.72 | 12.61 ± 2.07ab | 37.68 ± 3.65 | 23.07 ± 3.12b |
| OH (nmol/ml)) | 112.95 ± 12.38 | 34.31 ± 4.16ab | 111.98 ± 11.41 | 62.16 ± 9.28b |
| Oxidative stress indexes | ||||
| AOPP (u/ml) | 113.87 ± 17.83 | 71.32 ± 8.72ab | 112.87 ± 18.08 | 99.32 ± 9.08b |
| SOD (umol/ml) | 178.98 ± 23.72 | 112.45 ± 16.74ab | 177.68 ± 24.08 | 152.63 ± 18.92b |
| MDA (umol/ml) | 9.56 ± 1.83 | 5.53 ± 0.82ab | 9.48 ± 1.23 | 7.21 ± 0.92b |
Before treatment, compared with the same group (aP < .05); after treatment, compared with the control group (bP < .05).