| Literature DB >> 34691225 |
Liao Wu1, Ying Sun2, Guihua Ni1, Bo Sun1, Xiaoyu Ni1, Shikun Cai1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research aimed at investigating the efficacy of edaravone combined with clopidogrel on acute cerebral infarction (ACI) and its influence on the neurological deficit and life function.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34691225 PMCID: PMC8531786 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8030521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of general data.
| Information | CG ( | RG ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Gender | 0.002 | 0.964 | ||
| Male | 49 | 57 | ||
| Female | 22 | 26 | ||
| Age (years) | 55.61 ± 8.92 | 56.78 ± 8.19 | 0.848 | 0.398 |
| Infarction site | 0.181 | 0.913 | ||
| Basal ganglia region | 32 | 35 | ||
| Cerebellum | 21 | 27 | ||
| Brainstem | 18 | 21 | ||
| Time from onset to consultation | 5.44 ± 2.98 | 5.92 ± 2.83 | 1.024 | 0.308 |
| Hypertension | 0.068 | 0.794 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 45 | ||
| No | 34 | 38 | ||
| Diabetes | 2.046 | 0.153 | ||
| Yes | 32 | 47 | ||
| No | 39 | 36 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 1.074 | 0.300 | ||
| Yes | 35 | 34 | ||
| No | 36 | 49 | ||
| History of smoking | 0.210 | 0.647 | ||
| Yes | 24 | 31 | ||
| No | 47 | 52 | ||
| History of excessive drinking | 0.008 | 0.931 | ||
| Yes | 33 | 38 | ||
| No | 38 | 45 | ||
Figure 1Flowchart.
Comparison of efficacy (n (%)).
| Group | Cure | Remarkably effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective rate |
|
| |||||
| CG ( | 17 (23.94) | 21 (29.58) | 18 (25.35) | 15 (21.13) | 56 (78.87) |
| RG ( | 25 (30.12) | 27 (32.53) | 23 (27.21) | 8 (9.64) | 75 (90.36) |
|
| 3.975 | ||||
|
| 0.046 | ||||
Comparison of adverse reactions (n (%)).
| Group | Nausea | Vomiting | Dizziness | Total incidence |
|
| ||||
| CG ( | 2 (2.82) | 3 (4.23) | 2 (2.82) | 7 (9.86) |
| RG ( | 1 (1.20) | 1 (1.20) | 3 (3.61) | 5 (6.02) |
|
| 0.783 | |||
|
| 0.376 | |||
Figure 2Comparison of the NIHSS score (mean ± SD, scores). Note: compared with the same group before treatment, P < 0.001; compared with the CG after treatment, #P < 0.001.
Figure 3Comparison of cerebral hemodynamic indexes (mean ± SD). Note: compared with the CG, P < 0.001.
Figure 4Comparison of the life function score (mean ± SD, scores). Note: compared with the same group before treatment, P < 0.001; compared with the CG after treatment, #P < 0.001.