Literature DB >> 33326770

Nuclear Deformation Causes DNA Damage by Increasing Replication Stress.

Pragya Shah1, Chad M Hobson2, Svea Cheng1, Marshall J Colville3, Matthew J Paszek3, Richard Superfine4, Jan Lammerding5.   

Abstract

Cancer metastasis, i.e., the spreading of tumor cells from the primary tumor to distant organs, is responsible for the vast majority of cancer deaths. In the process, cancer cells migrate through narrow interstitial spaces substantially smaller in cross-section than the cell. During such confined migration, cancer cells experience extensive nuclear deformation, nuclear envelope rupture, and DNA damage. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the confined migration-induced DNA damage remain incompletely understood. Although in some cell lines, DNA damage is closely associated with nuclear envelope rupture, we show that, in others, mechanical deformation of the nucleus is sufficient to cause DNA damage, even in the absence of nuclear envelope rupture. This deformation-induced DNA damage, unlike nuclear-envelope-rupture-induced DNA damage, occurs primarily in S/G2 phase of the cell cycle and is associated with replication forks. Nuclear deformation, resulting from either confined migration or external cell compression, increases replication stress, possibly by increasing replication fork stalling, providing a molecular mechanism for the deformation-induced DNA damage. Thus, we have uncovered a new mechanism for mechanically induced DNA damage, linking mechanical deformation of the nucleus to DNA replication stress. This mechanically induced DNA damage could not only increase genomic instability in metastasizing cancer cells but could also cause DNA damage in non-migrating cells and tissues that experience mechanical compression during development, thereby contributing to tumorigenesis and DNA damage response activation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; cancer; cell compression; confined migration; metastasis; nuclear deformation; nuclear envelope rupture; nuclear mechanobiology; replication stress

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33326770      PMCID: PMC7904640          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  69 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical control of tissue and organ development.

Authors:  Tadanori Mammoto; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Analysis of cellular DNA content by flow and laser scanning cytometry.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration.

Authors:  Celine M Denais; Rachel M Gilbert; Philipp Isermann; Alexandra L McGregor; Mariska te Lindert; Bettina Weigelin; Patricia M Davidson; Peter Friedl; Katarina Wolf; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  RPA and RAD51: fork reversal, fork protection, and genome stability.

Authors:  Kamakoti P Bhat; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Involvement of oxidatively damaged DNA and repair in cancer development and aging.

Authors:  Barbara Tudek; Alicja Winczura; Justyna Janik; Agnieszka Siomek; Marek Foksinski; Ryszard Oliński
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Static compression is associated with decreased diffusivity of dextrans in cartilage explants.

Authors:  T M Quinn; P Kocian; J J Meister
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions.

Authors:  M Zafarullah; W Q Li; J Sylvester; M Ahmad
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Nadya Dimitrova; Yi-Chun M Chen; David L Spector; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.

Authors:  Jessica L Alexander; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Automated analysis of cell migration and nuclear envelope rupture in confined environments.

Authors:  Joshua J Elacqua; Alexandra L McGregor; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  The biophysics of cancer: emerging insights from micro- and nanoscale tools.

Authors:  Peter E Beshay; Marcos G Cortes-Medina; Miles M Menyhert; Jonathan W Song
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 2.  Fibrous stroma: Driver and passenger in cancer development.

Authors:  Vandana Sharma; Joshua Letson; Saori Furuta
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Tunable 3D Hydrogel Microchannel Networks to Study Confined Mammalian Cell Migration.

Authors:  Katharina Siemsen; Sunil Rajput; Florian Rasch; Fereydoon Taheri; Rainer Adelung; Jan Lammerding; Christine Selhuber-Unkel
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Low lamin A levels enhance confined cell migration and metastatic capacity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emily S Bell; Pragya Shah; Noam Zuela-Sopilniak; Dongsung Kim; Alice-Anais Varlet; Julien L P Morival; Alexandra L McGregor; Philipp Isermann; Patricia M Davidson; Joshua J Elacqua; Jonathan N Lakins; Linda Vahdat; Valerie M Weaver; Marcus B Smolka; Paul N Span; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 8.756

5.  Mechanical Stimulation after Centrifuge-Free Nano-Electroporative Transfection Is Efficient and Maintains Long-Term T Cell Functionalities.

Authors:  Andy Tay; Nicholas Melosh
Journal:  Small       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 6.  Genome instability from nuclear catastrophe and DNA damage.

Authors:  Anna E Mammel; Emily M Hatch
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  Ongoing repair of migration-coupled DNA damage allows planarian adult stem cells to reach wound sites.

Authors:  Sounak Sahu; Divya Sridhar; Prasad Abnave; Noboyoshi Kosaka; Anish Dattani; James M Thompson; Mark A Hill; Aziz Aboobaker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 8.  Components and Mechanisms of Nuclear Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Philipp Niethammer
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 11.902

Review 9.  Engineered ECM models: Opportunities to advance understanding of tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Adrian A Shimpi; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.386

Review 10.  Molecular cancer cell responses to solid compressive stress and interstitial fluid pressure.

Authors:  Purboja Purkayastha; Manish K Jaiswal; Tanmay P Lele
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.