| Literature DB >> 33326469 |
Hiroshi Akima1,2, Akito Yoshiko3, Régis Radaelli4, Madoka Ogawa5, Kaori Shimizu2, Aya Tomita3, Hisashi Maeda6, Rodrigo Neske4, Juliana Teodoro4, Kazuhiro Maeda2, Noriko Tanaka1,2, Ronei Pinto4.
Abstract
Muscle quality is well-known to decrease with aging and is a risk factor for metabolic abnormalities. However, there is a lack of information on race-associated differences in muscle quality and other neuromuscular features related to functional performance. This study aimed to compare muscle quality, function, and morphological characteristics in Japanese and Brazilian older individuals. Eighty-four participants aged 65-87 years were enrolled in the study (42 Japanese: 23 men, 19 women, mean age 70.4 years; 42 Brazilians: 23 men, 19 women, mean age 70.8 years). Echo intensity (EI) and muscle thickness (MT) of the quadriceps femoris were measured using B-mode ultrasonography. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with EI as a dependent variable revealed that MT was a significant variable for Japanese participants (R2 = 0.424, P = 0.001), while MT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) thickness were significant variables for Brazilian participants (R2 = 0.490, P = 0.001). A second stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed after excluding MT and SCAT thickness from the independent variables. Sex and age for Japanese participants (R2 = 0.381, P = 0.001) and lean body mass and body mass index for Brazilian participants (R2 = 0.385, P = 0.001) were identified as significant independent variables. The present results suggest that MT is closely correlated with muscle quality in Japanese and Brazilian older individuals. Increases in muscle size may induce decreases in intramuscular adipose tissue and/or connective tissues, which are beneficial for reducing the risks of metabolic impairments in Japanese and Brazilian older individuals.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33326469 PMCID: PMC7743983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Representative B-mode ultrasound images at the anterior mid-thigh of Japanese and Brazilian older men and women.
RF, rectus femoris; SCAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VI, vastus intermedius. The ultrasound images were taken with the internal RF tendon located at the center of each image.
Demographic, functional, and morphological characteristics of Japanese and Brazilian older individuals.
| Japanese (N = 42) | Brazilians (N = 42) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ± | SD | 95% CI | Mean | ± | SD | 95% CI | Ratio of Japanese to Brazilians (%) | Effect size (d) | ||
| Demographic parameters | |||||||||||
| Men/Women | 23/19 | 23/19 | |||||||||
| Age (years) | 70.4 | ± | 5.1 | 68.4, 71.6 | 70.8 | ± | 5.9 | 69.0, 72.7 | 99.4 | 0.07 | |
| Height (cm) | 159.8 | ± | 8.3 | 157.8, 163.2 | 164.1 | ± | 9.4 | 161.2, 167.1 | 97.4 | 0.48 | |
| Weight (kg) | 57.5 | ± | 9.8 | 55.1, 61.5 | 74.3 | ± | 14.2 | 69.9, 78.8 | 77.4 | 1.38 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.4 | ± | 2.7 | 21.6, 23.4 | 27.4 | ± | 3.9 | 26.2, 28.6 | 81.8 | 1.49 | |
| Abdominal girth (cm) | 85.2 | ± | 8.2 | 82.6, 88.3 | 99.8 | ± | 11.7 | 96.2, 103.5 | 85.4 | 1.45 | |
| Body fat (%) | 27.8 | ± | 7.3 | 25.3, 30.3 | 37.7 | ± | 7.3 | 35.4, 40.0 | 73.7 | 1.36 | |
| LBM (kg) | 0.3 | ± | 12.1 | 31.0, 39.7 | 46.4 | ± | 10.5 | 43.1, 49.6 | 0.6 | 0.99 | |
| Physical activity | |||||||||||
| Vigorous (day/week) | 0.3 | ± | 0.7 | 0.1, 0.8 | 1.1 | ± | 1.7 | 0.6, 1.7 | 27.3 | 0.07 | |
| Vigorous (min/day) | 20.5 | ± | 37.5 | 3.8, 37.1 | 30.0 | ± | 47.7 | 15.1, 44.9 | 68.3 | 0.22 | |
| Moderate (day/week) | 1.2 | ± | 1.6 | 0.4, 1.5 | 2.6 | ± | 2.5 | 1.8, 3.4 | 46.2 | 0.83 | |
| Moderate (min/day) | 47.2 | ± | 51.4 | 18.0, 55.6 | 55.0 | ± | 65.8 | 34.5, 75.5 | 85.8 | 0.33 | |
| Sedentary time (min/day) | 300.0 | ± | 147.2 | 221.3, 340.5 | 326.8 | ± | 189.2 | 267.8, 385.7 | 91.8 | 0.28 | |
| Functional parameters | |||||||||||
| Sit-up (reps) | 10.8 | ± | 6.7 | 8.2, 12.2 | 6.7 | ± | 7.3 | 4.4, 8.9 | 161.2 | 0.59 | |
| Supine up (s) | 2.9 | ± | 0.8 | 2.6, 3.2 | 4.7 | ± | 2.2 | 3.9, 5.3 | 61.7 | 1.09 | |
| Sit-to-stand (s) | 11.9 | ± | 2.5 | 11.3, 13.1 | 17.9 | ± | 4.5 | 16.5, 19.3 | 66.5 | 1.65 | |
| 5-m maximal walk (s) | 2.3 | ± | 0.3 | 2.2, 2.5 | 2.6 | ± | 0.5 | 2.4, 2.8 | 88.5 | 0.73 | |
| Grip strength (kg) | 28.5 | ± | 7.5 | 25.9, 31.0 | 29.9 | ± | 9.4 | 27.1, 32.9 | 95.3 | 0.16 | |
| Morphological parameters | |||||||||||
| MT of RF (mm) | 14.2 | ± | 3.4 | 13.3, 15.6 | 14.8 | ± | 4.6 | 13.3, 16.2 | 95.9 | 0.15 | |
| MT of VI-ant (mm) | 13.4 | ± | 4.4 | 12.3, 15.3 | 12.7 | ± | 4.4 | 11.3, 14.1 | 105.5 | 0.16 | |
| MT of RF&VI-ant (mm) | 27.6 | ± | 6.9 | 25.9, 30.6 | 27.5 | ± | 12.4 | 24.8, 30.1 | 100.4 | 0.01 | |
| MT of VL (mm) | 17.0 | ± | 3.8 | 16.2, 18.7 | 16.2 | ± | 4.3 | 14.9, 17.5 | 104.9 | 0.20 | |
| VI-lateral MT (mm) | 12.5 | ± | 4.0 | 11.4, 14.1 | 13.5 | ± | 4.3 | 12.1, 14.8 | 92.6 | 0.24 | |
| MT of VL&VI-lat (mm) | 29.5 | ± | 6.8 | 28.0, 32.5 | 29.7 | ± | 7.5 | 27.4, 32.0 | 99.3 | 0.03 | |
| MT of QF (mm) | 28.6 | ± | 6.2 | 27.3, 31.3 | 28.6 | ± | 7.5 | 26.2, 31.0 | 100.0 | 0.00 | |
| Anterior SCAT thickness (mm) | 7.9 | ± | 2.7 | 7.1, 9.0 | 12.4 | ± | 5.3 | 10.7, 14.0 | 63.7 | 1.07 | |
| Lateral SCAT thickness (mm) | 5.6 | ± | 2.3 | 4.9, 6.6 | 9.2 | ± | 4.5 | 7.8, 10.6 | 60.9 | 0.65 | |
| QF SCAT thickness (mm) | 6.8 | ± | 2.4 | 6.1, 7.8 | 10.8 | ± | 4.8 | 9.3, 12.3 | 63.0 | 1.05 | |
*, P < 0.05
**, P < 0.01
†, P < 0.001.
BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; LBM, lean body mass; MT, muscle thickness; QF, quadriceps femoris; RF, rectus femoris; SCAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VI, vastus intermedius: VL, vastus lateralis
Fig 2Comparison of the echo intensities of the RF, VL, and QF between Japanese and Brazilian participants.
RF, rectus femoris; VL, vastus lateralis; QF, quadriceps femoris.
Relationship between echo intensity and demographic and functional parameters.
| Echo intensity of RF | Echo intensity of VL | Echo intensity of QF | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese | Brazilians | Japanese | Brazilians | Japanese | Brazilians | |||||||
| Demographic parameters | ||||||||||||
| Age | 0.348 | 0.161 | 0.410 | 0.249 | 0.438 | 0.226 | ||||||
| Body weight | -0.282 | -0.531 | -0.539 | -0.558 | -0.473 | -0.606 | ||||||
| BMI | -0.192 | -0.524 | -0.444 | -0.399 | -0.367 | -0.517 | ||||||
| Abdominal girth | -0.084 | -0.381 | -0.183 | -0.354 | -0.154 | -0.410 | ||||||
| Body fat | 0.165 | 0.072 | 0.063 | 0.271 | 0.130 | 0.187 | ||||||
| LBM | -0.407 | -0.470 | -0.177 | -0.595 | -0.334 | -0.590 | ||||||
| Functional parameters | ||||||||||||
| Sit-up | -0.124 | -0.179 | -0.117 | -0.229 | -0.139 | -0.227 | ||||||
| Supine-up | -0.324 | 0.191 | 0.178 | 0.207 | 0.288 | 0.222 | ||||||
| Sit-to-stand | 0.336 | 0.122 | 0.077 | 0.219 | 0.236 | 0.188 | ||||||
| 5-m maximal walk | 0.174 | 0.156 | 0.173 | 0.229 | 0.198 | 0.214 | ||||||
| Grip strength | -0.387 | -0.239 | -0.543 | -0.458 | -0.535 | -0.383 | ||||||
*, P < 0.05
**, P < 0.01.
BMI, body mass index; LBM, lean body mass; QF, quadriceps femoris; RF, rectus femoris; VL, vastus lateralis
Relationship between functional capacity and lean body mass (LBM) and %body fat in Japanese and Brazilian older individuals.
| Japanese | Brazilians | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBM | Body fat | LBM | Body fat | |||||
| Sit-up (reps) | 0.285 | -0.377 | 0.319 | -0.720 | ||||
| Supine up (s) | -0.475 | 0.562 | -0.462 | 0.624 | ||||
| Sit-to-stand (s) | -0.480 | 0.030 | -0.475 | 0.450 | ||||
| 5-m maximal walk (s) | -0.492 | 0.199 | -0.546 | 0.533 | ||||
*, P < 0.05
**, P < 0.01.
Relationship between echo intensity and morphological parameters.
| Echo intensity of RF | Echo intensity of VL | Echo intensity of QF | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese | Brazilians | Japanese | Brazilians | Japanese | Brazilians | |||||||
| Anterior QF | ||||||||||||
| MT of RF | -0.615 | -0.667 | -0.507 | -0.473 | -0.644 | -0.641 | ||||||
| MT of VI | -0.264 | -0.473 | -0.659 | -0.469 | -0.533 | -0.525 | ||||||
| MT of RF&VI | -0.464 | -0.614 | -0.658 | -0.506 | -0.646 | -0.628 | ||||||
| SCAT thickness | 0.153 | -0.224 | 0.167 | 0.004 | 0.183 | -0.128 | ||||||
| Lateral QF | ||||||||||||
| MT of VL | -0.264 | -0.415 | -0.564 | -0.718 | -0.477 | -0.625 | ||||||
| MT of VI | -0.299 | -0.455 | -0.458 | -0.311 | -0.437 | -0.431 | ||||||
| MT of VL&VI | -0.324 | -0.504 | -0.585 | -0.592 | -0.524 | -0.609 | ||||||
| SCAT thickness | 0.270 | -0.091 | 0.165 | 0.092 | 0.249 | -0.003 | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| MT of QF | -0.439 | -0.591 | -0.691 | -0.575 | -0.651 | -0.651 | ||||||
| SCAT thickness of QF | 0.207 | -0.166 | 0.169 | 0.047 | 0.216 | -0.071 | ||||||
*, P < 0.05
**, P < 0.01
MT, muscle thickness; QF, quadriceps femoris; RF, rectus femoris; SCAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VI, vastus intermedius: VL, vastus lateralis
Stepwise regression analysis as a dependent variable of echo intensity of the quadriceps femoris.
| Group | Dependent variables | Independent variables | Regression coefficient | SE | Standard regression coefficients | P | R | Adjusted R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | ||||||||
| Japanese | QF EI | QF MT | -0.904 | 0.167 | -0.651 | 0.001 | 0.651 | 0.424 |
| Brazilians | QF EI | QF MT | -0.831 | 0.137 | -0.723 | 0.001 | 0.700 | 0.490 |
| QF SCAT thickness | -0.480 | 0.214 | -0.266 | 0.031 | ||||
| Step 2 | ||||||||
| Japanese | QF EI | Sex | 7.614 | 2.201 | 0.449 | 0.001 | 0.618 | 0.381 |
| Age | 0.556 | 0.219 | 0.330 | 0.015 | ||||
| Brazilians | QF EI | LBM | -0.367 | 0.117 | -0.443 | 0.003 | 0.644 | 0.415 |
| BMI | -0.670 | 0.318 | -0.297 | 0.042 |
BMI, body mass index; EI, echo intensity; LBM, lean body mass; MT, muscle thickness; SCAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; SE, standard error; VI, vastus intermedius: VL, vastus lateralis; QF, quadriceps femoris.
Independent variables for Step1: age, grip strength, QF MT, QF SCAT, sit-to-stand.
Independent variables for Step 2: age, BMI, LBM, sex, sit-to-stand.