Literature DB >> 33325622

Suppressing synchronous firing of epileptiform activity by high-frequency stimulation of afferent fibers in rat hippocampus.

Zhaoxiang Wang1, Zhouyan Feng1, Yue Yuan1, Lvpiao Zheng1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising technology for treating epilepsy. However, the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of the high-frequency stimulation (HFS) utilized by DBS to suppress epilepsy remain uncertain. Previous studies have shown that HFS can desynchronize the firing of neurons. In this study, we investigated whether the desynchronization effects of HFS can suppress epileptiform events.
METHODS: HFS trains with seconds of duration (short) and a minute of duration (long) were applied at the afferent fibers (ie, Schaffer collaterals) of the hippocampal CA1 region in anesthetized rats in vivo. The amplitude and the rate of population spikes (PS) appeared in the downstream of stimulation were calculated to evaluate the intensity of synchronized firing of neuronal populations between short and long HFS groups. A test of paired-pulse depression (PPD) was used to assess the alteration of inhibitory neuronal circuits.
RESULTS: The sustained stimulation of a 60-s long HFS suppressed the afterdischarges that were induced by a 5-s short HFS to impair the local inhibitions. During the sustained HFS, the mean PS amplitude reduced significantly and the burst firing decreased, while the amount of neuronal firing did not change significantly. The paired-pulse tests showed that with a similar baseline level of small PS2/PS1 ratio indicating a strong PPD, the 5-s HFS increased the PS2/PS1 ratio to a value that was significantly greater than the corresponding ratio during sustained HFS, indicating that the PPD impaired by a short HFS may be restored by a sustained HFS.
CONCLUSIONS: The sustained HFS can desynchronize the population firing of epileptiform activity and accelerate a recovery of inhibitions to create a balance between the excitation and the inhibition of local neuronal circuits. The study provides new clues for further understanding the mechanism of DBS and for advancing the clinical application of DBS in treating epilepsy.
© 2020 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  afterdischarge; burst; de-synchronization; epilepsy; high-frequency stimulation; hippocampal CA1 region

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33325622      PMCID: PMC7871785          DOI: 10.1111/cns.13535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther        ISSN: 1755-5930            Impact factor:   5.243


  64 in total

1.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Warren M Grill; David L Sherman; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Suppression of hippocampal epileptic seizures in the kainate rat by Poisson distributed stimulation.

Authors:  Tine Wyckhuys; Paul Boon; Robrecht Raedt; Bregt Van Nieuwenhuyse; Kristl Vonck; Wytse Wadman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Distinct types of ionic modulation of GABA actions in pyramidal cells and interneurons during electrical induction of hippocampal seizure-like network activity.

Authors:  Yoko Fujiwara-Tsukamoto; Yoshikazu Isomura; Michiko Imanishi; Tomoki Fukai; Masahiko Takada
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  High frequency stimulation can suppress globally seizures induced by 4-AP in the rat hippocampus: an acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Chou-Ching K Lin; Ming-Shaung Ju; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Desynchronization of epileptiform activity by extracellular current pulses in rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  D M Durand; E N Warman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Picrotoxin-induced epileptiform activity in hippocampus: role of endogenous versus synaptic factors.

Authors:  J J Hablitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The hippocampal rate code: anatomy, physiology and theory.

Authors:  Omar J Ahmed; Mayank R Mehta
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Induction of c-fos mRNA by kindled seizures: complex relationship with neuronal burst firing.

Authors:  D M Labiner; L S Butler; Z Cao; D A Hosford; C Shin; J O McNamara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Inhibitory or excitatory? Optogenetic interrogation of the functional roles of GABAergic interneurons in epileptogenesis.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Stephanie Kaszuba
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.410

10.  Suppressing synchronous firing of epileptiform activity by high-frequency stimulation of afferent fibers in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhaoxiang Wang; Zhouyan Feng; Yue Yuan; Lvpiao Zheng
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.243

View more
  2 in total

1.  Suppressing synchronous firing of epileptiform activity by high-frequency stimulation of afferent fibers in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhaoxiang Wang; Zhouyan Feng; Yue Yuan; Lvpiao Zheng
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  An Anodic Phase Can Facilitate Rather Than Weaken a Cathodic Phase to Activate Neurons in Biphasic-Pulse Axonal Stimulations.

Authors:  Lvpiao Zheng; Zhouyan Feng; Yipeng Xu; Yue Yuan; Yifan Hu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.