A novel formal [3+2] and [4+2] annulation of ketoxime acetates and ynals for the synthesis of pyrroles and isoquinolines has been developed. By simply switching the catalyst and solvent, the reaction proceeds via two pathways. The reactions are achieved under mild conditions with broad substrate scope and excellent regioselectivity.
A novel formal [3+2] and [4+2] annulation of ketoxime acetates and ynals for the synthesis of pyrroles and isoquinolines has been developed. By simply switching the catalyst and solvent, the reaction proceeds via two pathways. The reactions are achieved under mild conditions with broad substrate scope and excellent regioselectivity.
Nitrogen-containing
heterocycles have always attracted considerable
attention in natural products, pharmaceutical chemistry, and materials
science.[1] Hence, the establishment of efficient
approaches for their preparation is the hot spot in organic synthesis.
Divergent synthesis allows the rapid entry to structurally diverse
products from the same substrates and therefore has been a powerful
tool to forge a variety of bioactive molecules.[2] The realization of diversity synthesis requires control
of the reaction conditions to regulate the selectivity according to
the reactivity of the substrates and the intermediates.[3] Among them, transition-metal-catalyzed annulation
has been the most effective strategies in the divergent synthesis
of N-containing heterocycles.[4]Recently,
oxime esters have drawn extensive interest as the readily
available chemicals and internal oxidants.[5] Due to the relatively low bond energy of the N–O bond, they
have been widely used as versatile starting materials for N-containing
heterocycle construction through N–O bond cleavage.[6] Specifically, oxime acetates provide structurally
feasible C2N1 synthons in the assembly of the
framework of N-heterocycles,[7] including
pyridines,[8] pyrroles,[9] azoles,[10] fused nitrogen heterocycles,
etc.[11] Despite many recent advances in
this field, continuing to explore practical and regioselective routes
for the synthesis of significant N-heterocycles is still highly desirable.Pyrroles and isoquinolines represent prevalent heterocyclic skeletons
with a broad array of biological and pharmacological activities.[12] Therefore, numbers of classical protocols[13] and alternative methods[14,15] have been well documented over the past decades. Despite the significance
of these procedures, the novel and complementary methodologies for
pyrrole and isoquinoline synthesis is of high interest, especially
using divergent synthesis strategy from available raw materials. Ynals,
as readily accessible precursors and valuable building blocks, have
been extensively applied in many cyclization reactions for the construction
of heterocycliccompounds.[16] Originating
from our continuous studies on ynals,[17] herein we present the first divergent synthesis of pyrroles and
isoquinolines from ketoxime acetates and ynals via formal [3+2] and
[4+2] annulations under different catalytic systems (Scheme ). It is important to note
that these carbonyl-containing heterocycle products have potential
applications in synthetic and pharmaceutical chemistry. Moreover,
the annulation of ketoxime acetates and enals generally furnished
the pyridine products.[18]
Scheme 1
Formal [3+2] and
[4+2] Annulations of Ketoxime Acetates and Ynals
Results and Discussion
Initially, the reaction of acetophenone
oxime acetate 1a and phenylpropiolaldehyde 2a under argon was explored
to obtain the optimal conditions. As illustrated in Table , the reaction failed to produce
the desired product in the absence of a catalyst (entry 1). Various
common coppercatalysts were tried (entries 2–6). All of the
copper salts had positive effects on the reaction, and CuBr was found
to deliver the best result in 65% yield (entry 4). Then, CuBr was
chosen as the catalyst, some solvents were tested (entries 7–9).
The results revealed that acetonitrile was beneficial to the transformation.
After further investigation of the reaction, it was found that the
main byproduct was acetylated pyrrole. Therefore, the reaction can
furnish the 3a product in 82% yield through the N-deacetylation step (entry 10).[19] Interestingly, a mixture of 3a and 4a was
observed when adding a catalytic amount of [Cp*RhCl2]2 to the system (entry 11). It showed that the Cu(OAc)2catalyst proved effective for yield improvement (entries
12–14). When the solvent was switched from acetonitrile to
DMF, 4a was exclusively generated in good yield (entry
15). As a solvent, MeOH was deleterious to this transformation (entries
16–18). Finally, it was disadvantageous when the reaction was
performed at higher or lower temperatures (entries 19 and 20).
Table 1
Optimization of the Reaction Parameters
for the Switchable Formation of Productsa
entry
catalyst
solvent
temperature
yield (%) 3a/4a
1
MeCN
60
-/-
2
CuI
MeCN
60
50/-
3
CuCl
MeCN
60
42/-
4
CuBr
MeCN
60
65/-
5
CuBr2
MeCN
60
31/-
6
Cu(OAc)2
MeCN
60
26/-
7
CuBr
DMF
60
48/-
8
CuBr
toluene
60
33/-
9
CuBr
DCE
60
30/-
10b
CuBr
MeCN
60
82/-
11c
CuBr
MeCN
60
29/41
12c
CuBr2
MeCN
60
13/28
13c
Cu(OTf)2
MeCN
60
16/53
14c
Cu(OAc)2
MeCN
60
17/68
15c
Cu(OAc)2
DMF
60
-/84
16c
Cu(OAc)2
DMSO
60
-/36
17c
Cu(OAc)2
toluene
60
-/32
18c
Cu(OAc)2
MeOH
60
-/-
19c
Cu(OAc)2
DMF
80
-/55
20c
Cu(OAc)2
DMF
40
-/20
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol) with catalyst (30 mol %)
in a solvent (1.0 mL) for 8 h under argon. Isolated yield.
BuOK
(0.4 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture after the reaction, and
the reaction continued at room temperature for 1 h.
[Cp*RhCl2]2 (2.5
mol %) was used.
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol) with catalyst (30 mol %)
in a solvent (1.0 mL) for 8 h under argon. Isolated yield.BuOK
(0.4 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture after the reaction, and
the reaction continued at room temperature for 1 h.[Cp*RhCl2]2 (2.5
mol %) was used.With the
optimal reaction conditions in hand, the substrate scope
of the copper-catalyzed formal [3+2] annulation reactions for pyrrole
formation was screened, and the results are summarized in Scheme . Initially, a set
of aryl propargyl aldehydes worked well with acetophenone oxime acetate 1a to generate pyrroles in moderate to good yields (3b–3k). The substrate bearing either an electron-rich
or an electron-deficient group on the benzene ring was tolerated and
furnished the pyrrole derivatives in 60%–81% yields. A bulky tert-butyl group substituted ynalcould transfer into the
desired products in good yield (3d). The yield was not
affected obviously with the methoxy group at the ortho-position of the benzene ring (3f). The heterocycle
ynal reacted smoothly and achieved the desired product in satisfactory
yield (3j). To our delight, aliphaticynal was also applicable
and transfer into the corresponding product in 56% yield (3k). In continuous evaluation of the generality of this annulation
reaction, a wide range of substituted acetophenone oxime acetates
were examined (3l–3u). The steric
effects of the methyl group were not apparent (3l–3n). Naphthyl oxime led to the corresponding product 3p in good yield. Heterocyclic 2-furyl and 2-thienyl substituted
ketoxime acetates also proceeded well to deliver the products in 66%
and 63% yields, respectively (3s and 3t).
Finally, substituted oxime reacted successfully with substituted ynal,
which implied that this annulation reaction can be effective for the
pyrrole library (3v). Notably, the reaction could be
employed on large-scale synthesis and produced 3a in
70% yield. The structure of 3a was further confirmed
by X-ray crystallographic analysis.[20] Interestingly, N-acetylated pyrrolescan be obtained in moderate yields
without the N-deacetylation step (3w–3y).
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Pyrrole Derivatives
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), and CuBr (30 mol
%) in MeCN (1 mL) were stirred at 60 °C for 8 h under argon,
then BuOK (0.4 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture after the reaction, and the reaction continued at
room temperature for 1 h.
2 mmol scale of the reaction.
Without the deacetylation step.
Synthesis of Pyrrole Derivatives
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), and CuBr (30 mol
%) in MeCN (1 mL) were stirred at 60 °C for 8 h under argon,
then BuOK (0.4 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture after the reaction, and the reaction continued at
room temperature for 1 h.2 mmol scale of the reaction.Without the deacetylation step.Subsequently,
the Rh/Cuco-catalyzed reaction toward isoquinolines
was evaluated under the optimal conditions (Scheme ). In general, the formal [4+2] annulation
reaction has good functional group tolerance. Initially, both electron-donating
and electron-withdrawing groups on the aromatic ring of ynals were
compatible under the standard conditions. A variety of substituents
were perfectly tolerated in this catalytic reaction, such as alkyl,
aryl, methoxy, fluoro, chloro, bromo, acetyl, and ester groups (4b–4l). The disubstituted ynal afforded
the products in good yields (4e). It is noteworthy that
the products containing bromo, acetyl, or ester groups could be further
functionalized and have potential applications in synthetic and pharmaceutical
chemistry (4j–4l). The scope with
respect to the oximes was then screened under the standard conditions
(4n–4w). A set of aromatic ketoximeacetates were successfully coupled with phenylpropiolaldehyde 2a to achieve the respective isoquinoline-4-carbaldehydes
in moderate to good yields. Significantly, the straight-chain, cyclic,
and diaryl oximes were all reactive in this annulation reaction and
converted to the isoquinolines in satisfactory yields (4n–4q). A para-substituted oxime
was beneficial for the reaction compared to the ortho-substituted substrate (4s and 4t). The
challenging substrate, heteroaromatic oxime, was suitable in this
reaction, albeit in relatively low yield (4w). Ynals
bearing the substituents of opposite properties participated efficiently
with substituted oximes (4x–4z).
Unluckily, alkyl-substituted progargyl aldehyde was investigated,
and only the trace product could be tested (4aa). The
structure and regioselectivity of 4a was further proved
by X-ray crystal diffraction measurement.[20] A large-scale synthesis using 2 mmol of 1a and 2a was conducted, and 4a was formed in 73% yield.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Isoquinoline Derivatives
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2
mmol), [Cp*RhCl2]2 (2.5 mol %), and Cu(OAc)2 (30 mol %) in
DMF (1 mL) were stirred at 60 °C for 8 h under argon.
2 mmol scale of the reaction.
Synthesis of Isoquinoline Derivatives
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2
mmol), [Cp*RhCl2]2 (2.5 mol %), and Cu(OAc)2 (30 mol %) in
DMF (1 mL) were stirred at 60 °C for 8 h under argon.2 mmol scale of the reaction.To probe the possible reaction pathway, some
control experiments
were carried out, and the results are shown in Scheme . When the radical inhibitors TEMPO and BHT
were added to the reaction of 1a with 2a under the standard conditions, the formation of 3a and 4a was largely suppressed (Scheme a). Oxygen was disadvantageous for the formation
of 3a (Scheme b). Product 3a′ with 18O in
the carbonyl group was not detected by using H218O as the additive (Scheme c). These results may suggest that electron-transfer processes
were involved in the transformations, and the oxygen atom of the pyrrole
products originated from the OAc group other than O2 or
H2O.
Scheme 4
Control Experiments
On the basis of previous reports on copper-catalyzed transformation
of oxime acetates and our experiment results,[21] a plausible mechanism toward pyrroles was proposed (Scheme a). First, the intermediate
copper(II) enamide C was produced via the sequential
single-electron reduction and tautomerization process from oxime acetate 1a.[8b,18a] Next, nucleophilic addition
of C to ynal 2a generated intermediate D, and elimination of D achieved intermediate E.[22] Subsequently, N-acetylated pyrrole G was afforded via a tandem nucleophilic
attack and annulation followed by a rearrangement process. Finally,
the 3a product was formed through the N-deacetylation step.
Scheme 5
Possible Mechanism toward Pyrroles and Isoquinolines
On the other hand, a possible mechanism for
isoquinoline formation
was simply presented according to the related literature (Scheme b).[23] Iminylcopper(II) species B reacted with Rh(III)
to afford rhodacyclic intermediate G via an iminyl rhodium
intermediate I. Insertion of ynal 2a furnished
intermediate K, which was converted into the product 4a and Rh(I) species via reductive elimination. A redox reaction
between Rh(I) and Cu(II) regenerated Rh(III) and Cu(I).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient divergent strategy
to construct pyrroles as well as isoquinolines from ketoxime acetates
and ynals with excellent regioselectivity. The reaction involves N–O
bond cleavages and new C–C/C–N bond formations. The
merit of this protocol includes commercial or readily available substrates,
ligand and additive-free, good functional group tolerance, high atom
economy, etc. Further studies regarding the mechanism and synthetic
applications are currently underway in our laboratory.
Experimental
Section
General Information
1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were obtained on a 400 and 100 MHz NMR
spectrometer. The chemical shifts are referenced to signals at 7.26
and 77.0 ppm, respectively, and chloroform was used as the solvent
with TMS as the internal standard unless otherwise noted. Melting
points (mp) were determined using a melting point instrument (uncorrected).
Mass spectra were recorded on a GC-MS spectrometer at an ionization
voltage of 70 eV equipped with a DB-WAX capillary column (internal
diameter: 0.25 mm, length: 30 m). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS)
(TOF) were measured using an electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry.
Silica gel (300–400 mesh) was used for flash column chromatography,
eluting (unless otherwise stated) with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether
(PE) (60–90 °C) mixture.The propargyl aldehydes 2a and 2k were commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich
China. Substituted ketoxime acetates and other propargyl aldehydes
were synthesized according to the literature,[17,23b] and data of known compounds were compared with the reported data.[8]
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Pyrroles
(3a–3v)
A mixture of ketoxime
acetate (0.2
mmol), ynal (0.2 mmol), CuBr (8.6 mg, 30 mol %) in MeCN (1.0 mL) was
stirred in a preheated oil bath at 60 °C for 8 h in a sealed
tube under an argon atmosphere, then BuOK (44.8 mg, 0.4 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture after
the reaction, and the reaction continued at room temperature for 1
h. After the reaction was finished, water (5 mL) was added and the
solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL), and the
combined extract was dried with anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent
was removed, and the residue was separated by column chromatography
to give the pure sample.
Large-Scale Synthesis
An oven-dried
25 mL screw cap
test tube was charged with a magnetic stir bar, 1a (354
mg, 2 mmol), 2a (260 mg, 2 mmol), CuBr (85 mg, 30 mol
%), and MeCN (6.0 mL). Then, the tube was placed in a preheated oil
bath at 60 °C for 8 h. After the solution cooled to room temperature,
water (10 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with ethyl
acetate (3 × 10 mL); the combined extract was dried with anhydrous
MgSO4. The solvent was removed, and the residue was separated
by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:7) to
give 3a (346 mg, 70%).
General Procedure for the Synthesis of N-Acetylated
Pyrroles (3w–3y)
A mixture
of ketoxime acetate (0.2 mmol), ynal (0.2 mmol), and CuBr (8.6 mg,
30 mol %) in MeCN (1.0 mL) was stirred in a preheated oil bath at
60 °C for 8 h in a sealed tube under an argon atmosphere. After
the reaction was finished, water (5 mL) was added and the solution
was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL), and the combined
extract was dried with anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was
removed, and the residue was separated by column chromatography to
give the pure sample.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Isoquinolines (4a–4v)
A mixture of ketoxime
acetate (0.2 mmol), ynal (0.2 mmol), [Cp*RhCl2]2 (3.1 mg, 2.5 mol %), and Cu(OAc)2 (10.9 mg, 30 mol %)
in DMF (1.0 mL) was stirred in a preheated oil bath at 60 °C
for 8 h in a sealed tube under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction
was finished, water (5 mL) was added and the solution was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL), and the combined extract was dried
with anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was removed, and the
residue was separated by column chromatography to give the pure sample.
Large-Scale
Synthesis
An oven-dried 25 mL screw cap
test tube was charged with a magnetic stir bar, 1a (354
mg, 2 mmol), 2a (260 mg, 2 mmol), [Cp*RhCl2]2 (31 mg, 2.5 mol %), Cu(OAc)2 (109 mg, 30
mol %), and DMF (6.0 mL). Then, the tube was placed in a preheated
oil bath at 60 °C for 8 h. After the solution cooled to room
temperature, water (10 mL) was added and the solution was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL); the combined extract was dried
with anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was removed, and the
residue was separated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether = 1:8) to give 4a (361 mg, 73%).