Literature DB >> 33323708

Determining Progression in Ectatic Corneal Disease.

Michael W Belin1, Reza Alizadeh1, Emilio A Torres-Netto2,3,4, Farhad Hafezi2,3,5, Renato Ambrósio6,4, Bojan Pajic5.   

Abstract

Before the advent of modern tomographic imaging and corneal cross-linking (CXL), diagnosis and treatment of ectatic disease were limited to disease severity where changes on the anterior corneal surface lead to visual complaints. Rigid contact lenses and/or penetrating keratoplasty addressed late stage disease, as identifying early or subclinical disease was not possible, or its need appreciated. The emergence of CXL as a viable treatment to alter the natural progression of keratoconus heightened the need for improved diagnostics.Several methods have been described in the literature to evaluate and document progression in keratoconus, but there has been no consistent definition of ectasia progression. Newer imaging techniques (ie, tomography) allowed the detection of earlier ectatic disease, before visual loss and subjective complaints. The Belin ABCD classification/staging system was introduced on a Scheimpflug imaging system [Pentacam, (Oculus GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany)] to address previous shortcomings. The ABCD system utilizes 4 parameters: Anterior ("A") and posterior ("B" for Back) radius of curvature taken from a 3.0 mm optical zone centered on the thinnest point, "C" is minimal Corneal thickness, and "D" best spectacle Distance visual acuity. The first 3 parameters (A, B, C) are machine-generated objective measurements that can be used to determine progressive change.The staging system is not limited to a specific commercial entity and can be incorporated in any tomographic imaging system. The ABCD Progression Display graphically displays each parameter and shows when statistical change above measurement noise is reached. This should allow the clinician the ability to diagnose progressive disease at a much earlier stage than was previously possible, with the confidence that earlier intervention could prevent visual loss.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33323708     DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)        ISSN: 2162-0989


  4 in total

1.  Impact of rigid gas-permeable contact lens on keratometric indices and corneal thickness of keratoconus eyes examined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kaho Akiyama; Takashi Ono; Hitoha Ishii; Lily Wei Chen; Kohdai Kitamoto; Tetsuya Toyono; Junko Yoshida; Makoto Aihara; Takashi Miyai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  [Stage-appropriate treatment of keratoconus].

Authors:  B Seitz; L Daas; L Hamon; K Xanthopoulou; S Goebels; C Spira-Eppig; S Razafimino; N Szentmáry; A Langenbucher; E Flockerzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.174

3.  Transepithelial Iontophoresis-Assisted Cross Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: Up to 7 Years of Follow Up.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Emanuela F Legrottaglie; Costanza Tredici; Cosimo Mazzotta; Pietro Rosetta; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas.

Authors:  Erika Eskina; Olga Klokova; Roman Damashauskas; Karine Davtyan; Bojan Pajic; Marina Movsesian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.