Literature DB >> 33323516

A Noncanonical DNA Damage Checkpoint Response in a Major Fungal Pathogen.

Erika Shor1,2, Rocio Garcia-Rubio3, Lucius DeGregorio3, David S Perlin1,2,4.   

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints are key guardians of genome integrity. Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by triggering extensive phosphorylation of Rad53/CHK2 effector kinase, whereupon activated Rad53/CHK2 mediates further aspects of checkpoint activation, including cell cycle arrest and transcriptional changes. Budding yeast Candida glabrata, closely related to model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is an opportunistic pathogen characterized by high genetic diversity and rapid emergence of drug-resistant mutants. However, the mechanisms underlying this genetic variability are unclear. We used Western blotting and mass spectrometry to show that, unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata cells exposed to DNA damage did not induce C. glabrata Rad53 (CgRad53) phosphorylation. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis showed that, unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata cells did not accumulate in S phase upon DNA damage. Consistent with these observations, time-lapse microscopy showed C. glabrata cells continuing to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in mitotic errors and cell death. Finally, transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) analysis revealed transcriptional rewiring of the DNA damage response in C. glabrata and identified several key protectors of genome stability upregulated by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but downregulated in C. glabrata, including proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Together, our results reveal a noncanonical fungal DNA damage response in C. glabrata, which may contribute to rapidly generating genetic change and drug resistance.IMPORTANCE In order to preserve genome integrity, all cells must mount appropriate responses to DNA damage, including slowing down or arresting the cell cycle to give the cells time to repair the damage and changing gene expression, for example to induce genes involved in DNA repair. The Rad53 protein kinase is a conserved central mediator of these responses in eukaryotic cells, and its extensive phosphorylation upon DNA damage is necessary for its activation and subsequent activity. Interestingly, here we show that in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata, Rad53 phosphorylation is not induced by DNA damage, nor do these cells arrest in S phase under these conditions, in contrast to the closely related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Instead, C. glabrata cells continue to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in significant cell lethality. Finally, we show that a number of genes involved in DNA repair are strongly induced by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but repressed in C. glabrata Together, these findings shed new light on mechanisms regulating genome stability in fungal pathogens.
Copyright © 2020 Shor et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida glabrata; DNA damage checkpoints; DNA damage response; Rad53; cell division

Year:  2020        PMID: 33323516      PMCID: PMC7773997          DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03044-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mBio            Impact factor:   7.867


  90 in total

Review 1.  The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Construction and evaluation of two biosensors based on yeast transcriptional response to genotoxic chemicals.

Authors:  Ting Wei; Chao Zhang; Xin Xu; Michelle Hanna; Xiaohua Zhang; Yan Wang; Heping Dai; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 3.  The Many Roles of PCNA in Eukaryotic DNA Replication.

Authors:  E M Boehm; M S Gildenberg; M T Washington
Journal:  Enzymes       Date:  2016-04-19

4.  In Vitro Exposure to Increasing Micafungin Concentrations Easily Promotes Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata Isolates.

Authors:  María Ángeles Bordallo-Cardona; Pilar Escribano; Elia Gómez G de la Pedrosa; Laura Judith Marcos-Zambrano; Rafael Cantón; Emilio Bouza; Jesús Guinea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Signal transduction: how rad53 kinase is activated.

Authors:  Achille Pellicioli; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-01

7.  Cross-species chemogenomic profiling reveals evolutionarily conserved drug mode of action.

Authors:  Laura Kapitzky; Pedro Beltrao; Theresa J Berens; Nadine Gassner; Chunshui Zhou; Arthur Wüster; Julie Wu; M Madan Babu; Stephen J Elledge; David Toczyski; R Scott Lokey; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Limited DNA Repair Gene Repertoire in Ascomycete Yeast Revealed by Comparative Genomics.

Authors:  Shira Milo; Reut Harari-Misgav; Einat Hazkani-Covo; Shay Covo
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Molecular mechanisms of DNA replication checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Bénédicte Recolin; Siem van der Laan; Nikolay Tsanov; Domenico Maiorano
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Patterns of Genomic Variation in the Opportunistic Pathogen Candida glabrata Suggest the Existence of Mating and a Secondary Association with Humans.

Authors:  Laia Carreté; Ewa Ksiezopolska; Cinta Pegueroles; Emilia Gómez-Molero; Ester Saus; Susana Iraola-Guzmán; Damian Loska; Oliver Bader; Cecile Fairhead; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 10.900

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Post-Translational Modifications of PCNA: Guiding for the Best DNA Damage Tolerance Choice.

Authors:  Gemma Bellí; Neus Colomina; Laia Castells-Roca; Neus P Lorite
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Evolutionary Divergence in DNA Damage Responses among Fungi.

Authors:  Jacob L Steenwyk
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 3.  DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans.

Authors:  Shuangyan Yao; Yuting Feng; Yan Zhang; Jinrong Feng
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  Using in vivo transcriptomics and RNA enrichment to identify genes involved in virulence of Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Sanne Schrevens; Eric Durandau; Van Du T Tran; Dominique Sanglard
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Transcriptional Profiling of the Candida albicans Response to the DNA Damage Agent Methyl Methanesulfonate.

Authors:  Yuting Feng; Yan Zhang; Jie Li; Raha Parvizi Omran; Malcolm Whiteway; Jinrong Feng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  A peculiar cell cycle arrest at g2/m stage during the stationary phase of growth in the wine yeast Hanseniaspora vineae.

Authors:  Luisa Vivian Schwarz; Maria Jose Valera; Ana Paula Longaray Delamare; Francisco Carrau; Sergio Echeverrigaray
Journal:  Curr Res Microb Sci       Date:  2022-03-26

7.  Abf1 Is an Essential Protein That Participates in Cell Cycle Progression and Subtelomeric Silencing in Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Grecia Hernández-Hernández; Laura A Vera-Salazar; Leonardo Castanedo; Eunice López-Fuentes; Guadalupe Gutiérrez-Escobedo; Alejandro De Las Peñas; Irene Castaño
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.