Literature DB >> 33323077

Determining cancer risk: the evolutionary multistage model or total stem cell divisions?

Leonard Nunney1, Kevin Thai1.   

Abstract

A recent hypothesis proposed that the total number of stem cell divisions in a tissue (TSCD model) determine its intrinsic cancer risk; however, a different model-the multistage model-has long been used to understand how cancer originates. Identifying the correct model has important implications for interpreting the frequency of cancers. Using worldwide cancer incidence data, we applied three tests to the TSCD model and an evolutionary multistage model of carcinogenesis (EMMC), a model in which cancer suppression is recognized as an evolving trait, with natural selection acting to suppress cancers causing a significant mean loss of Darwinian fitness. Each test supported the EMMC but contradicted the TSCD model. This outcome undermines results based on the TSCD model quantifying the relative importance of 'bad luck' (the random accumulation of somatic mutations) versus environmental and genetic factors in determining cancer incidence. Our testing supported the EMMC prediction that cancers of large rapidly dividing tissues predominate late in life. Another important prediction is that an indicator of recent oncogenic environmental change is an unusually high mean fitness loss due to cancer, rather than a high lifetime incidence. The evolutionary model also predicts that large and/or long-lived animals have evolved mechanisms of cancer suppression that may be of value in preventing or controlling human cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peto's paradox; cancer; evolution; lifetime stem cell divisions; multistage carcinogenesis; multistep carcinogenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33323077      PMCID: PMC7779499          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

1.  Overestimating the Role of Environment in Cancers.

Authors:  Robert Noble; Oliver Kaltz; Leonard Nunney; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-07-19

2.  Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Evolution of cancer suppression as revealed by mammalian comparative genomics.

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Joshua D Schiffman; Amy M Boddy
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Cancer genome landscapes.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Victor E Velculescu; Shibin Zhou; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Peto's paradox and the promise of comparative oncology.

Authors:  Leonard Nunney; Carlo C Maley; Matthew Breen; Michael E Hochberg; Joshua D Schiffman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A new theory on cancer-inducing mechanism.

Authors:  C O NORDLING
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Insights into the evolution of longevity from the bowhead whale genome.

Authors:  Michael Keane; Jeremy Semeiks; Andrew E Webb; Yang I Li; Víctor Quesada; Thomas Craig; Lone Bruhn Madsen; Sipko van Dam; David Brawand; Patrícia I Marques; Pawel Michalak; Lin Kang; Jong Bhak; Hyung-Soon Yim; Nick V Grishin; Nynne Hjort Nielsen; Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen; Elias M Oziolor; Cole W Matson; George M Church; Gary W Stuart; John C Patton; J Craig George; Robert Suydam; Knud Larsen; Carlos López-Otín; Mary J O'Connell; John W Bickham; Bo Thomsen; João Pedro de Magalhães
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Return to the Sea, Get Huge, Beat Cancer: An Analysis of Cetacean Genomes Including an Assembly for the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Jooke Robbins; Andrew E Webb; Lukas F K Kuderna; Aleah F Caulin; Jacinda D Garcia; Martine Bèrubè; Nader Pourmand; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Mary J O'Connell; Per J Palsbøll; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is intracranial volume a risk factor for IDH-mutant low-grade glioma? A case-control study.

Authors:  Lisa Millgård Sagberg; Even Hovig Fyllingen; Tor Ivar Hansen; Per Sveino Strand; Aril Løge Håvik; Terje Sundstrøm; Alba Corell; Asgeir Store Jakola; Øyvind Salvesen; Ole Solheim
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Cancer suppression and the evolution of multiple retrogene copies of TP53 in elephants: A re-evaluation.

Authors:  Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Profound synchrony of age-specific incidence rates and tumor suppression for different cancer types as revealed by the multistage-senescence model of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson; Catalina V Anghel; Dennis S Deng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.