Literature DB >> 33323002

The IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism is associated with colorectal cancer risk.

Shulong Zhang1, Xiaoting Wang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The association of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been previously reported. However, the results are inconsistent. In this study, we comprehensively assessed the effect of the rs2275913 polymorphism on CRC risk.
METHODS: The rs2275913 polymorphism of 208 CRC patients and 312 age- and gender-matched healthy controls was genotyped by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method, and then analyzed by logistic regression. In addition, a pooled analysis based on five single-center studies was performed using Stata 12.0 software.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis indicated that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was associated with CRC risk (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02-2.28; AA vs. GG: OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.11-3.20; GA+AA vs. GG: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.11-2.37; A vs. G: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.07-1.77). Further pooled analysis also indicated a statistically significant association between the rs2275913 polymorphism and CRC risk in Asians and Northern Africans.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism may act as a biomarker for predicting CRC risk. However, further functional research should be performed to clarify the role of the rs2275913 polymorphism in the etiology of CRC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interleukin-17A; colorectal cancer; genetics; polymorphism; risk; single nucleotide polymorphism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33323002      PMCID: PMC7745596          DOI: 10.1177/0300060520979117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in males and the second most common type of cancer in women.[1] Several lifestyle-related factors, such as obesity, heavy alcohol consumption, smoking and physical inactivity, have been reported to increase the risk of developing CRC.[2,3] In addition, individual genetic factors can also play an important role in CRC development. KRAS, NRAS and BRAF gene mutations could serve as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in CRC.[4] The human interleukin 17A (IL17A) gene is located on chromosome 6p12.2 and encodes a cytokine which was initially identified in 1993 as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-8.[5] The cytokine is produced mainly by activated T cells, while its receptor is distributed ubiquitously.[6] IL-17A participates in the regulation of diverse immune functions, such as the expression of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, production of antibodies, and activation and recruitment of leukocytes.[7,8] IL-17A is often described as a mediator of inflammation with a crucial role in the development of multiple cancers.[9-11] In CRCs, the expression levels of IL-17A were significantly increased compared with those of adjacent normal tissues.[12,13] Serum cysteine–cysteine motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) combined with IL-17A may act as early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC.[13] In addition, several studies from different countries found that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) located at the promoter region of the IL17A gene (rs2275913) may affect an individual’s risk of developing CRC.[14-16] However, Bedoui et al. showed that there was no significant association between the rs2275913 polymorphism and CRC risk.[17] Although a case-control study explored the potential association in a Chinese population, the results needed to be further confirmed due to the small sample size of the study.[14] Hence, in the present study, we not only investigated the association of the rs2275913 polymorphism with CRC risk in a Chinese population by a case-control study method, but also systematically assessed the association of the rs2275913 polymorphism and CRC risk by a pooled analysis method. Overall, we found that the IL-17 rs2275913 polymorphism is associated with CRC risk and may act as a biomarker for predicting susceptibility to CRC.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

In the case–control study, 208 patients with histopathologically diagnosed CRC and 312 gender- and age-matched healthy controls were recruited from Xuhui District Central Hospital of Shanghai between October 2017 and December 2019. The healthy controls were selected from the health examination center at the same hospital. Any control subject with a personal or family history of cancer or digestive disease was excluded. The demographic and medical data of the patients and healthy controls were collected (Table 1). This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the hospital (No: 047-001). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Table 1.

Demographic and medical data of the colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy controls.

CharacteristicsCRC Cases (n = 208)Controls (n = 312)P-value
Age, years60.1 ± 8.659.8 ± 8.10.69
Gender
 Male156 (75.0%)230 (73.7%)0.74
 Female52 (25.0%)82 (26.3%)
Smoking status
 Yes128 (61.5%)202 (64.7%)0.46
 No80 (38.5%)110 (35.3%)
Alcohol consumption status
 Yes121 (58.2%)197 (63.1%)0.25
 No87 (41.8%)115 (36.9%)
Histological grade
Well differentiated48 (23.1%)
Moderately differentiated119 (57.2%)
Poorly differentiated41 (19.7%)
TNM stage
 I + II95 (45.7%)
 III + IV113 (54.3%)
Tumor size
 >5 cm115 (55.3%)
 ≤5 cm93 (44.7%)
Lymph node metastasis status
 Yes101 (48.6%)
 No107 (51.4%)
Demographic and medical data of the colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy controls.

Genomic DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes of each subject by using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The concentration and quality of the extracted DNA were measured by using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The rs2275913 polymorphism was genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The primers used for the nucleotide extension reaction were 5ʹ-AACAA GTAAGAATGAAAAGAGGACATG GT-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-CCCCCAATGAGGTCATAGAAG AATC-3ʹ (reverse). PCR was performed in 25-µL reactions with an initial denaturation step at 96°C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, then ended with a single elongation step at 72°C for 5 minutes. The PCR products were digested with XagI and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. To ensure the accuracy of genotypes, about 10% of the samples were randomly chosen for Sanger sequencing. The results were 100% concordant.

Data collection

The PubMed, Embase and CNKI databases were used to search for published studies on the association of the rs2275913 polymorphism with CRC risk. Search terms included “interleukin 17A or IL17A,” “rs2275913 or polymorphism or variant,” and “colorectal cancer or CRC.” The last search was performed on 20 April 2020. Specific information, including the first author's name, country, ethnicity, genotyping method, genotype frequency distribution of the rs2275913 polymorphism in cases and controls, and the results of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) tests in the control group, was collected independently by two researchers from relevant and eligible studies. An eligible study on the association of the rs2275913 polymorphism with CRC risk needed to meet the following conditions: a) be a case-control study; b) have a control group HWE test P-value > 0.05; c) have genotype and allele data available. Any discrepancies would be resolved by discussion with the third researcher.

Statistical analysis

The differences in age, gender, smoking and alcohol consumption between case and control subjects were calculated using a Student's t test or chi-square (χ2) test, respectively. The deviation between the observed and the expected frequencies among controls was evaluated by HWE test through a goodness-of-fit χ2 test. In the case-control study, the association between the rs2275913 polymorphism and CRC risk was evaluated by computing the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analysis. In the pooled analysis, the crude ORs with 95% CI were calculated based on a random effect model to assess the association. In addition, the stability of the results of the pooled analysis was evaluated by sensitivity analysis. A possible publication bias was evaluated by Begg's test and Egger's test. All statistical analyses were conducted on SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) or Stata 12.0 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) with the significance level at P<0.05.

Results

The mean age (mean ± SD) of patients and healthy controls was 60.1±8.6 and 59.8±8.1 years, respectively (P = 0.69). The ratio of males to females was 156:52 and 230:82 in patients and healthy controls, respectively (P = 0.74). The genotype and allele distributions for the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism were significantly different between CRC patients and healthy controls (Table 2). The genotype frequencies of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism were in accordance with HWE test among the control subjects (PHWE = 0.85). The GA or AA genotype carriers showed a significantly increased risk for CRC (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.02–2.28, P = 0.04; AA vs. GG: OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.11–3.20, P = 0.02). Similarly, under a dominant or additive model, the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was also associated with an increased risk for CRC (GA+AA vs. GG: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.11–2.37, P = 0.02; A vs. G: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.07–1.77, P = 0.02).
Table 2.

A case-control study of the association between the rs2275913 polymorphism of the IL-17A gene and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.

Comparison modelGenotype and alleleCases (%)(n = 208)Controls (%) (n = 312)aOR (95% CI)aP-value
Co-dominant modelGG57 (27.4)118 (37.8)Reference
GA110 (52.9)149 (47.8)1.53 (1.02–2.28)0.04
AA41 (19.7)45 (14.4)1.89 (1.11–3.20)0.02
Dominant modelGG57 (27.4)118 (37.8)Reference
GA+AA151 (72.6)194 (62.2)1.62 (1.11–2.37)0.02
Recessive modelGG+GA167 (80.3)267 (85.6)Reference
AA41 (19.7)45 (14.4)1.45 (0.91–2.31)0.15
Additive modelG224 (53.8)385 (61.7)Reference
A192 (46.2)239 (38.3)1.38 (1.07–1.77)0.02

a: adjusted for age, gender, smoking and alcohol consumption; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

A case-control study of the association between the rs2275913 polymorphism of the IL-17A gene and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. a: adjusted for age, gender, smoking and alcohol consumption; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Five studies with 1023 CRC cases and 1223 controls were enrolled in the pooled analysis (Table 3). Therein, there were three studies on Asian populations and two studies on Northern African populations. The overall results showed that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was associated with CRC risk for all the genotype comparisons (GA+AA vs. GG: OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.29–2.10, P<0.001; AA vs. (GA+GG): OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.12–2.35, P = 0.010; AA vs. GG: OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.29–3.05, P = 0.002; GA vs. GG: OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.23–2.00, P<0.001; A vs. G: OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.24–1.78, P<0.001) (Table 4). In addition, the effects of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism on CRC risk were also observed in the subgroup analyses based on an Asian population (GA+AA vs. GG: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.18–2.23, P =0.003; AA vs. (GA+GG): OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.14–2.89, P = 0.011; AA vs. GG: OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.30–4.24, P = 0.005; GA vs. GG: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.14–1.80, P = 0.002; A vs. G: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.16–2.01, P = 0.003) and a Northern African population (A vs. G: OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.11–1.95, P = 0.007). The sensitivity analysis showed the reliability and stability of the whole pooled results under four other genotype comparisons, except for AA vs. (GA+GG) (Figure 1). Furthermore, there was no remarkable publication bias in Begg's test. However, Egger’s test indicated a publication bias affecting the overall results under (AA+GA) vs. GG (Table 5).
Table 3.

Features of the studies included in the pooled analysis.

First authorYearCountryEthnicityCancer typeGenotyping methodCases (GG/GA/AA)Controls (GG/GA/AA)PHWE
Zhang SL*2020ChinaAsianCRCPCR-RFLP57/110/41118/149/450.85
Feng H2019ChinaAsianCRCPCR-RFLP160/154/37231/169/310.99
Samiei G2018MalaysiaAsianCRCPCR-RFLP10/33/2727/41/120.58
Bedoui SA2018TunisiaNorthern AfricanCRCTaqMan199/79/14194/58/90.08
Omrane I2014TunisiaNorthern AfricanCRCF-RFLP48/51/395/38/60.39

*: the current case-control study.

CRC, colorectal cancer; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; F-RFLP, fluorescent-based restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Table 4.

A pooled analysis of the association between the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.

ComparisonOR (95% CI)P-value
The overall population
 (AA+GA) vs. GG1.65 (1.29–2.10)<0.001
 AA vs. (GA+GG)1.63 (1.12–2.35)0.010
 AA vs. GG1.98 (1.29–3.05)0.002
 GA vs. GG1.57 (1.23–2.00)<0.001
 A vs. G1.48 (1.24–1.78)<0.001
Asian population
 (AA+GA) vs. GG1.62 (1.18–2.23)0.003
 AA vs. (GA+GG)1.82 (1.14–2.89)0.011
 AA vs. GG2.35 (1.30–4.24)0.005
 GA vs. GG1.43 (1.14–1.80)0.002
 A vs. G1.52 (1.16–2.01)0.003
Northern African population
 (AA+GA) vs. GG1.76 (0.99–3.11)0.053
 AA vs. (GA+GG)1.16 (0.56–2.40)0.698
 AA vs. GG1.35 (0.65–2.83)0.421
 GA vs. GG1.83 (0.93–3.60)0.081
 A vs. G1.47 (1.11–1.95)0.007

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 1.

Sensitivity analysis for the overall pooled results.

Table 5.

Publication bias of the pooled analysis based on the overall population.

ComparisonP-value of Begg's testP-value of Egger's test
(AA+GA) vs. GG0.0860.029
AA vs. (GA+GG)0.8060.889
AA vs. GG0.8060.820
GA vs. GG0.0860.126
A vs. G0.0860.059
Features of the studies included in the pooled analysis. *: the current case-control study. CRC, colorectal cancer; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; F-RFLP, fluorescent-based restriction fragment length polymorphism. A pooled analysis of the association between the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Sensitivity analysis for the overall pooled results. Publication bias of the pooled analysis based on the overall population.

Discussion

Genetic polymorphisms are a main factor that can cause differences in an individual’s risk for cancer. An SNP is the most common type of human genetic variation. In the past decade, extensive research has been conducted about the association between certain SNPs and CRC risk, and dozens of SNPs have been reported to closely correlate with the occurrence of CRC.[18] Notably, the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism has been reported to be associated with the risk of multiple cancers.[19-21] However, the published results about the association of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism with CRC risk were inconsistent and needed further clarification. In the present study, we found that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was significantly associated with CRC risk in a Chinese population based on a case-control study. Compared with GG genotype carriers, GA or AA genotype carriers had a significantly increased risk for CRC. Similarly, under a dominant or additive model, the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was also associated with an increased risk for CRC in a Chinese population. Further pooled analysis also indicated that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism could affect an individual’s risk of developing CRC. These findings were observed not only in an Asian population, but also in a Northern African population. Overall, the individuals carrying an A allele at this genomic locus had an increased risk of CRC, compared with those carrying a G allele. Despite a comprehensive analysis of the association between the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and the risk of developing CRC, there were some limitations that should be considered. First, the number of samples and eligible studies remained insufficient, which can possibly lead to an imbalance and publication bias. Second, SNP-SNP and SNP-environment interactions should be taken into consideration, which would help with drawing more exact conclusions. Third, the follow-up data of the patients should have been obtained to analyze the association of this polymorphism with CRC survival rates. In conclusion, our study presents evidence that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism is associated with CRC risk. However, further well-designed studies are necessary to verify the findings.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Lifestyle and dietary environmental factors in colorectal cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Neil Murphy; Victor Moreno; David J Hughes; Ludmila Vodicka; Pavel Vodicka; Elom K Aglago; Marc J Gunter; Mazda Jenab
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2019-06-28

2.  Association of interleukin-17A polymorphisms with the risk of colorectal cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Sinda A Bedoui; Mouadh Barbirou; Mouna Stayoussef; Meriem Dallel; Amina Mokrani; Lamia Makni; Amel Mezlini; Balkiss Bouhaouala; Besma Yacoubi-Loueslati; Wassim Y Almawi
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 3.  The activation and regulation of IL-17 receptor mediated signaling.

Authors:  Xinyang Song; Youcun Qian
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.861

4.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Association between polymorphisms of interleukin-17A G197A and interleukin-17F A7488G and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Golnaz Samiei; Wai Kien Yip; Pooi Pooi Leong; Mohd Faisal Jabar; Noraini Mohd Dusa; Norhafizah Mohtarrudin; Heng Fong Seow
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.805

6.  IL-17 and colorectal cancer risk in the Middle East: gene polymorphisms and expression.

Authors:  Omar A Al Obeed; Mansoor-Ali Vaali-Mohamed; Khayal A Alkhayal; Thamer A Bin Traiki; Ahmad M Zubaidi; Maha Arafah; Robert A Harris; Zahid Khan; Maha-Hamadien Abdulla
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Association analyses identify 31 new risk loci for colorectal cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Philip J Law; Maria Timofeeva; Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla; Peter Broderick; James Studd; Juan Fernandez-Tajes; Susan Farrington; Victoria Svinti; Claire Palles; Giulia Orlando; Amit Sud; Amy Holroyd; Steven Penegar; Evropi Theodoratou; Peter Vaughan-Shaw; Harry Campbell; Lina Zgaga; Caroline Hayward; Archie Campbell; Sarah Harris; Ian J Deary; John Starr; Laura Gatcombe; Maria Pinna; Sarah Briggs; Lynn Martin; Emma Jaeger; Archana Sharma-Oates; James East; Simon Leedham; Roland Arnold; Elaine Johnstone; Haitao Wang; David Kerr; Rachel Kerr; Tim Maughan; Richard Kaplan; Nada Al-Tassan; Kimmo Palin; Ulrika A Hänninen; Tatiana Cajuso; Tomas Tanskanen; Johanna Kondelin; Eevi Kaasinen; Antti-Pekka Sarin; Johan G Eriksson; Harri Rissanen; Paul Knekt; Eero Pukkala; Pekka Jousilahti; Veikko Salomaa; Samuli Ripatti; Aarno Palotie; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Anna Lepistö; Jan Böhm; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Daniel D Buchanan; Aung-Ko Win; John Hopper; Mark E Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Steven Gallinger; David Duggan; Graham Casey; Per Hoffmann; Markus M Nöthen; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Douglas F Easton; Paul D P Pharoah; Julian Peto; Federico Canzian; Anthony Swerdlow; Rosalind A Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Kenneth Muir; Nora Pashayan; Andrea Harkin; Karen Allan; John McQueen; James Paul; Timothy Iveson; Mark Saunders; Katja Butterbach; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Iva Kirac; Petar Matošević; Philipp Hofer; Stefanie Brezina; Andrea Gsur; Jeremy P Cheadle; Lauri A Aaltonen; Ian Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors.

Authors:  Prashanth Rawla; Tagore Sunkara; Adam Barsouk
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-06

9.  The association between IL-17 gene variants and risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population: A case-control study.

Authors:  Haiyang Feng; Rongbiao Ying; Tengjiao Chai; Hailang Chen; Haixing Ju
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Serum CCL20 combined with IL-17A as early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Weitang Yuan; Yaping Wang; Qian Wu; Li Yang; Feng Li; Xinfeng Chen; Zhen Zhang; Weina Yu; Nomathamsanqa Resegofetse Maimela; Ling Cao; Dong Wang; Junxia Wang; Zhenqiang Sun; Jinbo Liu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.