| Literature DB >> 33323002 |
Shulong Zhang1, Xiaoting Wang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The association of the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been previously reported. However, the results are inconsistent. In this study, we comprehensively assessed the effect of the rs2275913 polymorphism on CRC risk.Entities:
Keywords: Interleukin-17A; colorectal cancer; genetics; polymorphism; risk; single nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33323002 PMCID: PMC7745596 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520979117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic and medical data of the colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy controls.
| Characteristics | CRC Cases (n = 208) | Controls (n = 312) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 60.1 ± 8.6 | 59.8 ± 8.1 | 0.69 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 156 (75.0%) | 230 (73.7%) | 0.74 |
| Female | 52 (25.0%) | 82 (26.3%) | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Yes | 128 (61.5%) | 202 (64.7%) | 0.46 |
| No | 80 (38.5%) | 110 (35.3%) | |
| Alcohol consumption status | |||
| Yes | 121 (58.2%) | 197 (63.1%) | 0.25 |
| No | 87 (41.8%) | 115 (36.9%) | |
| Histological grade | |||
| Well differentiated | 48 (23.1%) | ||
| Moderately differentiated | 119 (57.2%) | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 41 (19.7%) | ||
| TNM stage | |||
| I + II | 95 (45.7%) | ||
| III + IV | 113 (54.3%) | ||
| Tumor size | |||
| >5 cm | 115 (55.3%) | ||
| ≤5 cm | 93 (44.7%) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis status | |||
| Yes | 101 (48.6%) | ||
| No | 107 (51.4%) |
A case-control study of the association between the rs2275913 polymorphism of the IL-17A gene and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.
| Comparison model | Genotype and allele | Cases (%)(n = 208) | Controls (%) (n = 312) | aOR (95% CI) | a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-dominant model | GG | 57 (27.4) | 118 (37.8) | Reference | |
| GA | 110 (52.9) | 149 (47.8) | 1.53 (1.02–2.28) | 0.04 | |
| AA | 41 (19.7) | 45 (14.4) | 1.89 (1.11–3.20) | 0.02 | |
| Dominant model | GG | 57 (27.4) | 118 (37.8) | Reference | |
| GA+AA | 151 (72.6) | 194 (62.2) | 1.62 (1.11–2.37) | 0.02 | |
| Recessive model | GG+GA | 167 (80.3) | 267 (85.6) | Reference | |
| AA | 41 (19.7) | 45 (14.4) | 1.45 (0.91–2.31) | 0.15 | |
| Additive model | G | 224 (53.8) | 385 (61.7) | Reference | |
| A | 192 (46.2) | 239 (38.3) | 1.38 (1.07–1.77) | 0.02 |
a: adjusted for age, gender, smoking and alcohol consumption; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Features of the studies included in the pooled analysis.
| First author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Cancer type | Genotyping method | Cases (GG/GA/AA) | Controls (GG/GA/AA) | PHWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang SL* | 2020 | China | Asian | CRC | PCR-RFLP | 57/110/41 | 118/149/45 | 0.85 |
| Feng H | 2019 | China | Asian | CRC | PCR-RFLP | 160/154/37 | 231/169/31 | 0.99 |
| Samiei G | 2018 | Malaysia | Asian | CRC | PCR-RFLP | 10/33/27 | 27/41/12 | 0.58 |
| Bedoui SA | 2018 | Tunisia | Northern African | CRC | TaqMan | 199/79/14 | 194/58/9 | 0.08 |
| Omrane I | 2014 | Tunisia | Northern African | CRC | F-RFLP | 48/51/3 | 95/38/6 | 0.39 |
*: the current case-control study.
CRC, colorectal cancer; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; F-RFLP, fluorescent-based restriction fragment length polymorphism.
A pooled analysis of the association between the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.
| Comparison | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| The overall population | ||
| (AA+GA) vs. GG | 1.65 (1.29–2.10) | <0.001 |
| AA vs. (GA+GG) | 1.63 (1.12–2.35) | 0.010 |
| AA vs. GG | 1.98 (1.29–3.05) | 0.002 |
| GA vs. GG | 1.57 (1.23–2.00) | <0.001 |
| A vs. G | 1.48 (1.24–1.78) | <0.001 |
| Asian population | ||
| (AA+GA) vs. GG | 1.62 (1.18–2.23) | 0.003 |
| AA vs. (GA+GG) | 1.82 (1.14–2.89) | 0.011 |
| AA vs. GG | 2.35 (1.30–4.24) | 0.005 |
| GA vs. GG | 1.43 (1.14–1.80) | 0.002 |
| A vs. G | 1.52 (1.16–2.01) | 0.003 |
| Northern African population | ||
| (AA+GA) vs. GG | 1.76 (0.99–3.11) | 0.053 |
| AA vs. (GA+GG) | 1.16 (0.56–2.40) | 0.698 |
| AA vs. GG | 1.35 (0.65–2.83) | 0.421 |
| GA vs. GG | 1.83 (0.93–3.60) | 0.081 |
| A vs. G | 1.47 (1.11–1.95) | 0.007 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1.Sensitivity analysis for the overall pooled results.
Publication bias of the pooled analysis based on the overall population.
| Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
| (AA+GA) vs. GG | 0.086 | 0.029 |
| AA vs. (GA+GG) | 0.806 | 0.889 |
| AA vs. GG | 0.806 | 0.820 |
| GA vs. GG | 0.086 | 0.126 |
| A vs. G | 0.086 | 0.059 |