Literature DB >> 33322735

A Network-Based Mixed Methods Approach to Analyze Current Perspectives on Personalized Oncological Medicine in Austria.

Ines Viktoria Stelzer1,2, Anna Sierawska3,4, Alena Buyx3, Judit Simon1,2.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine (PM) to tailor healthcare (HC) to the individual, is a promising but challenging concept. So far, no study exists investigating stakeholders' perspectives on PM in oncology in Austria potentially hindering implementation, which was the aim of this study. We performed semi-structured interviews among experts (n = 14) and cancer patients (n = 2) of the Vienna General Hospital and the Medical University of Vienna and analyzed them by a mixed methods network theoretical approach. Study results show a great variety of topics addressed by the interviewees. Clear differences in the topic selection between patients and experts could be observed. Patient-doctor relationship was the most prominent theme among experts, whereas HC systems and public health in PM was more relevant for the patients. Although promising new molecular pathology methods were explicitly mentioned, the experts believed that their practical implementation and the implementation of PM in standard care will take a long time in Austria. A variety of concerns regarding PM were mentioned by the experts, including communication issues and knowledge gaps. Besides important insights into the current situation of PM in Austria, the study has shown that network theory is a powerful tool for analyzing qualitative interview data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Austria; experts; mixed methods approach; molecular pathology; network theory; oncology; patients; personalized medicine; qualitative interview study

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322735      PMCID: PMC7768434          DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Med        ISSN: 2075-4426


  24 in total

1.  How Do Patients Experience Individualized Medicine? A Qualitative Interview-based Study of Gene Expression Analyses in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Schleidgen; Sandra Thiersch; Rachel Wuerstlein; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Network analysis for the visualization and analysis of qualitative data.

Authors:  Jennifer J Pokorny; Alex Norman; Anthony P Zanesco; Susan Bauer-Wu; Baljinder K Sahdra; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 3.  Art and Challenges of Precision Medicine: Interpreting and Integrating Genomic Data Into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Subha Madhavan; Somasundaram Subramaniam; Thomas D Brown; James L Chen
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 4.  Personalized oncology: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Madhu Kalia
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 8.694

5.  Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research.

Authors:  Leslie A Curry; Harlan M Krumholz; Alicia O'Cathain; Vicki L Plano Clark; Emily Cherlin; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Jessica P Bytautas; Philippe L Bedard; Scott Ernst; Hal Hirte; Sebastien Hotte; Amit Oza; Albiruni Razak; Stephen Welch; Eric Winquist; Janet Dancey; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications.

Authors:  Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Panagiota I Kontou; Athanasia Pavlopoulou; Costas Bouyioukos; Evripides Markou; Pantelis G Bagos
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Patient and interest organizations' views on personalized medicine: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network.

Authors:  Nina R Sperber; Janet S Carpenter; Larisa H Cavallari; Laura J Damschroder; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Joshua C Denny; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Yue Guan; Carol R Horowitz; Kenneth D Levy; Mia A Levy; Ebony B Madden; Michael E Matheny; Toni I Pollin; Victoria M Pratt; Marc Rosenman; Corrine I Voils; Kristen W Weitzel; Russell A Wilke; R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Re-focusing the ethical discourse on personalized medicine: a qualitative interview study with stakeholders in the German healthcare system.

Authors:  Sebastian Schleidgen; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.