Literature DB >> 33322316

Could Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Be an Effective Treatment for Long COVID and Post COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome? Lessons from the Qure Study for Q-Fever Fatigue Syndrome.

Mark Vink1, Alexandra Vink-Niese2.   

Abstract

An increasing number of young and previously fit and healthy people who did not require hospitalisation continue to have symptoms months after mild cases of COVID-19. Rehabilitation clinics are already offering cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as an effective treatment for long COVID and post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome based on the claims that it is effective for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)-the most common post-infectious syndrome-as no study into the efficacy of CBT for post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome has been published. Re-analyses of these studies, however, showed that CBT did not lead to objective improvements in heterogeneous groups of ME/CFS patients, nor did it restore the ability to work. The group of patients with long COVID and post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome, on the other hand, is homogeneous. We therefore analysed the Dutch Qure study, as it studied the efficacy of CBT in a homogeneous group of patients who developed Q-fever fatigue syndrome-which affects up to 30% of patients-after the largest reported outbreak of Q-fever, to see if CBT might potentially be an effective treatment for long-haulers after COVID-19 infection. Our reanalysis found that the Qure study suffered from many serious methodological problems, which included relying on one subjective primary outcome in a study without a control group for the non-blinded CBT treatment group, using a post hoc definition of improvement, waiting 2 years before publishing their objective actometer results and ignoring the null effect of said results. Moreover, only 10% of participants achieved a clinically meaningful subjective improvement in fatigue as a result of CBT according to the study's own figures. Consequently, CBT has no subjective clinically meaningful effect in nine out of every ten patients that are treated with it. Additionally, the subjective improvement in fatigue was not matched by an improvement in disability, even though the disability was fatigue related according to the researchers. On top of this, CBT did not lead to an objective improvement in physical performance. Therefore, it cannot be said that CBT is an effective treatment for Q-fever fatigue syndrome either. It seems therefore unlikely that CBT will reduce disability or lead to objective improvement in long COVID or in post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBT; ME/CFS; actometer; chronic fatigue syndrome; cognitive behavioural therapy; disability; long COVID; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322316      PMCID: PMC7764131          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  41 in total

1.  Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  David F Tolin
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-05-25

Review 2.  A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Francesco Cozzolino; Massimiliano Orso; Mauro Marchesi; Antonella Germani; Guido Lombardo; Paolo Eusebi; Rita De Florio; Maria Laura Luchetta; Alfonso Iorio; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maja Stulemeijer; Lieke W A M de Jong; Theo J W Fiselier; Sigrid W B Hoogveld; Gijs Bleijenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-07

4.  Effects of exercise training and activity restriction on 6-minute walking test performance in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  K Meyer; M Schwaibold; S Westbrook; R Beneke; R Hajric; M Lehmann; H Roskamm
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Mental morbidities and chronic fatigue in severe acute respiratory syndrome survivors: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Marco Ho-Bun Lam; Yun-Kwok Wing; Mandy Wai-Man Yu; Chi-Ming Leung; Ronald C W Ma; Alice P S Kong; W Y So; Samson Yat-Yuk Fong; Siu-Ping Lam
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

Review 6.  Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Frida Emanuelsson; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Jørgen Hilden; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 7.  Fatigue following Acute Q-Fever: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Gabriella Morroy; Stephan P Keijmel; Corine E Delsing; Gijs Bleijenberg; Miranda Langendam; Aura Timen; Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

9.  Clinical and epidemiological use of nested PCR targeting the repetitive element IS1111 associated with the transposase gene from Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  Maria Angélica M M Mares-Guia; Alexandro Guterres; Tatiana Rozental; Michelle Dos Santos Ferreira; Elba R S Lemos
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 10.  Work Rehabilitation and Medical Retirement for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients. A Review and Appraisal of Diagnostic Strategies.

Authors:  Mark Vink; Friso Vink-Niese
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20
View more
  16 in total

1.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves neurocognitive functions and symptoms of post-COVID condition: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shani Zilberman-Itskovich; Merav Catalogna; Efrat Sasson; Karin Elman-Shina; Amir Hadanny; Erez Lang; Shachar Finci; Nir Polak; Gregory Fishlev; Calanit Korin; Ran Shorer; Yoav Parag; Marina Sova; Shai Efrati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Efficacy of an asynchronous telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar; Laura Romo-Calvo; Sara Pérez-Palomares; Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez; Pablo Herrero; Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz; Sandra Calvo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Assessment and Management of Long COVID.

Authors:  Rafael A Rivas-Vazquez; Gustavo Rey; Alan Quintana; Ana A Rivas-Vazquez
Journal:  J Health Serv Psychol       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 4.  Frequency, signs and symptoms, and criteria adopted for long COVID-19: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco; Rafael Leite Pacheco; Ângela Maria Bagattini; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.149

5.  More Than 50 Long-Term Effects of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sandra Lopez-Leon; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky; Carol Perelman; Rosalinda Sepulveda; Paulina Rebolledo; Angelica Cuapio; Sonia Villapol
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Severe Fatigue in Long COVID: Web-Based Quantitative Follow-up Study in Members of Online Long COVID Support Groups.

Authors:  Maarten Van Herck; Yvonne M J Goërtz; Sarah Houben-Wilke; Felipe V C Machado; Roy Meys; Jeannet M Delbressine; Anouk W Vaes; Chris Burtin; Rein Posthuma; Frits M E Franssen; Bita Hajian; Herman Vijlbrief; Yvonne Spies; Alex J van 't Hul; Daisy J A Janssen; Martijn A Spruit
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  More Than 100 Persistent Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 (Long COVID): A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lawrence D Hayes; Joanne Ingram; Nicholas F Sculthorpe
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 8.  Clinical patterns of somatic symptoms in patients suffering from post-acute long COVID: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nhu Ngoc Nguyen; Van Thuan Hoang; Thi Loi Dao; Pierre Dudouet; Carole Eldin; Philippe Gautret
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Need for an Integrated and Equitable Approach: An International Expert Consensus Paper.

Authors:  Grigoris T Gerotziafas; Mariella Catalano; Yiannis Theodorou; Patrick Van Dreden; Vincent Marechal; Alex C Spyropoulos; Charles Carter; Nusrat Jabeen; Job Harenberg; Ismail Elalamy; Anna Falanga; Jawed Fareed; Petros Agathaggelou; Darko Antic; Pier Luigi Antignani; Manuel Monreal Bosch; Benjamin Brenner; Vladimir Chekhonin; Mary-Paula Colgan; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos; Jim Douketis; Essam Abo Elnazar; Katalin Farkas; Bahare Fazeli; Gerry Fowkes; Yongquan Gu; Joseph Gligorov; Mark A Ligocki; Tishya Indran; Meganathan Kannan; Bulent Kantarcioglu; Abdoul Aziz Kasse; Kostantinos Konstantinidis; Fabio Leivano; Joseph Lewis; Alexander Makatsariya; P Massamba Mbaye; Isabelle Mahé; Irina Panovska-Stavridis; Dan-Mircea Olinic; Chryssa Papageorgiou; Zsolt Pecsvarady; Sergio Pillon; Eduardo Ramacciotti; Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Michele Sabbah; Mouna Sassi; Gerit Schernthaner; Fakiha Siddiqui; Jin Shiomura; Anny Slama-Schwok; Jean Claude Wautrecht; Alfonso Tafur; Ali Taher; Peter Klein-Wegel; Zenguo Zhai; Tazi Mezalek Zoubida
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.681

10.  More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sandra Lopez-Leon; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky; Carol Perelman; Rosalinda Sepulveda; Paulina A Rebolledo; Angelica Cuapio; Sonia Villapol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.