OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents aged 10-17 years with chronic fatigue syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Department of child psychology. PARTICIPANTS: 71 consecutively referred patients with chronic fatigue syndrome; 36 were randomly assigned to immediate cognitive behaviour therapy and 35 to the waiting list for therapy. INTERVENTION: 10 sessions of therapy over five months. Treatment protocols depended on the type of activity pattern (relatively active or passive). All participants were assessed again after five months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue severity (checklist individual strength), functional impairment (SF-36 physical functioning), and school attendance. RESULTS:62 patients had complete data at five months (29 in the immediate therapy group and 33 on the waiting list). Patients in the therapy group reported significantly greater decrease in fatigue severity (difference in decrease on checklist individual strength was 14.5, 95% confidence interval 7.4 to 21.6) and functional impairment (difference in increase on SF-36 physical functioning was 17.3, 6.2 to 28.4) and their attendance at school increased significantly (difference in increase in percentage school attendance was 18.2, 0.8 to 35.5). They also reported a significant reduction in several accompanying symptoms. Self reported improvement was largest in the therapy group. CONCLUSION:Cognitive behaviour therapy is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome in adolescents.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents aged 10-17 years with chronic fatigue syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Department of child psychology. PARTICIPANTS: 71 consecutively referred patients with chronic fatigue syndrome; 36 were randomly assigned to immediate cognitive behaviour therapy and 35 to the waiting list for therapy. INTERVENTION: 10 sessions of therapy over five months. Treatment protocols depended on the type of activity pattern (relatively active or passive). All participants were assessed again after five months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue severity (checklist individual strength), functional impairment (SF-36 physical functioning), and school attendance. RESULTS: 62 patients had complete data at five months (29 in the immediate therapy group and 33 on the waiting list). Patients in the therapy group reported significantly greater decrease in fatigue severity (difference in decrease on checklist individual strength was 14.5, 95% confidence interval 7.4 to 21.6) and functional impairment (difference in increase on SF-36 physical functioning was 17.3, 6.2 to 28.4) and their attendance at school increased significantly (difference in increase in percentage school attendance was 18.2, 0.8 to 35.5). They also reported a significant reduction in several accompanying symptoms. Self reported improvement was largest in the therapy group. CONCLUSION: Cognitive behaviour therapy is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome in adolescents.
Authors: J H Vercoulen; C M Swanink; F G Zitman; S G Vreden; M P Hoofs; J F Fennis; J M Galama; J W van der Meer; G Bleijenberg Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-03-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J B Prins; G Bleijenberg; E Bazelmans; L D Elving; T M de Boo; J L Severens; G J van der Wilt; P Spinhoven; J W van der Meer Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-03-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J H Vercoulen; E Bazelmans; C M Swanink; J F Fennis; J M Galama; P J Jongen; O Hommes; J W Van der Meer; G Bleijenberg Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Gianluca Castelnuovo; Emanuele M Giusti; Gian Mauro Manzoni; Donatella Saviola; Arianna Gatti; Samantha Gabrielli; Marco Lacerenza; Giada Pietrabissa; Roberto Cattivelli; Chiara A M Spatola; Stefania Corti; Margherita Novelli; Valentina Villa; Andrea Cottini; Carlo Lai; Francesco Pagnini; Lorys Castelli; Mario Tavola; Riccardo Torta; Marco Arreghini; Loredana Zanini; Amelia Brunani; Paolo Capodaglio; Guido E D'Aniello; Federica Scarpina; Andrea Brioschi; Lorenzo Priano; Alessandro Mauro; Giuseppe Riva; Claudia Repetto; Camillo Regalia; Enrico Molinari; Paolo Notaro; Stefano Paolucci; Giorgio Sandrini; Susan G Simpson; Brenda Wiederhold; Stefano Tamburin Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-02-19
Authors: E M van de Putte; R H H Engelbert; W Kuis; G Sinnema; J L L Kimpen; C S P M Uiterwaal Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Sarah I Detaille; Joost W J van der Gulden; Josephine A Engels; Yvonne F Heerkens; Frank J H van Dijk Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 3.295