Literature DB >> 33321959

Optimising an FFQ Using a Machine Learning Pipeline to teach an Efficient Nutrient Intake Predictive Model.

Nina Reščič1,2, Tome Eftimov3, Barbara Koroušić Seljak3, Mitja Luštrek1.   

Abstract

Food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are the most commonly selected tools in nutrition monitoring, as they are inexpensive, easily implemented and provide useful information regarding dietary intake. They are usually carefully drafted by experts from nutritional and/or medical fields and can be validated by using other dietary monitoring techniques. FFQs can get very extensive, which could indicate that some of the questions are less significant than others and could be omitted without losing too much information. In this paper, machine learning is used to explore how reducing the number of questions affects the predicted nutrient values and diet quality score. The paper addresses the problem of removing redundant questions and finding the best subset of questions in the Extended Short Form Food Frequency Questionnaire (ESFFFQ), developed as part of the H2020 project WellCo. Eight common machine-learning algorithms were compared on different subsets of questions by using the PROMETHEE method, which compares methods and subsets via multiple performance measures. According to the results, for some of the targets, specifically sugar intake, fiber intake and protein intake, a smaller subset of questions are sufficient to predict diet quality scores. Additionally, for smaller subsets of questions, machine-learning algorithms generally perform better than statistical methods for predicting intake and diet quality scores. The proposed method could therefore be useful for finding the most informative subsets of questions in other FFQs as well. This could help experts develop FFQs that provide the necessary information and are not overbearing for those answering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMETHEE; dimensionality reduction; feature selection; food frequency questionnaire; machine learning; missing data; supervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33321959      PMCID: PMC7764455          DOI: 10.3390/nu12123789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  11 in total

1.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Authors:  Melissa J Azur; Elizabeth A Stuart; Constantine Frangakis; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Handling missing data in an FFQ: multiple imputation and nutrient intake estimates.

Authors:  Mari Ichikawa; Akihiro Hosono; Yuya Tamai; Miki Watanabe; Kiyoshi Shibata; Shoko Tsujimura; Kyoko Oka; Hitomi Fujita; Naoko Okamoto; Mayumi Kamiya; Fumi Kondo; Ryozo Wakabayashi; Taiji Noguchi; Tatsuya Isomura; Nahomi Imaeda; Chiho Goto; Tamaki Yamada; Sadao Suzuki
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.

Authors:  Stef van Buuren
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Can a dietary quality score derived from a short-form FFQ assess dietary quality in UK adult population surveys?

Authors:  Christine L Cleghorn; Roger A Harrison; Joan K Ransley; Shan Wilkinson; James Thomas; Janet E Cade
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 5.  Dietary assessment resource manual.

Authors:  F E Thompson; T Byers
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  A comparison of statistical and machine-learning techniques in evaluating the association between dietary patterns and 10-year cardiometabolic risk (2002-2012): the ATTICA study.

Authors:  Dimitris Panaretos; Efi Koloverou; Alexandros C Dimopoulos; Georgia-Maria Kouli; Malvina Vamvakari; George Tzavelas; Christos Pitsavos; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Optimising the selection of food items for FFQs using Mixed Integer Linear Programming.

Authors:  Johanna C Gerdessen; Olga W Souverein; Pieter van 't Veer; Jeanne Hm de Vries
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Total and Free Sugars Consumption in a Slovenian Population Representative Sample.

Authors:  Nina Zupanič; Hristo Hristov; Matej Gregorič; Urška Blaznik; Nataša Delfar; Barbara Koroušić Seljak; Eric L Ding; Nataša Fidler Mis; Igor Pravst
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Nutrient Estimation from 24-Hour Food Recalls Using Machine Learning and Database Mapping: A Case Study with Lactose.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Chin; Gabriel Simmons; Yasmine Y Bouzid; Annie Kan; Dustin J Burnett; Ilias Tagkopoulos; Danielle G Lemay
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Jee-Seon Shim; Kyungwon Oh; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2014-07-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Food Frequency Questionnaire Personalisation Using Multi-Target Regression.

Authors:  Nina Reščič; Oscar Mayora; Claudio Eccher; Mitja Luštrek
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.706

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.